Literature DB >> 33674690

Exchange biased delta-E effect enables the detection of low frequency pT magnetic fields with simultaneous localization.

B Spetzler1, C Bald2, P Durdaut2, J Reermann2, C Kirchhof1, A Teplyuk2, D Meyners1, E Quandt1, M Höft2, G Schmidt2, F Faupel3.   

Abstract

Delta-E effect sensors are based on magnetoelectric resonators that detune in a magnetic field due to the delta-E effect of the magnetostrictive material. In recent years, such sensors have shown the potential to detect small amplitude and low-frequency magnetic fields. Yet, they all require external magnetic bias fields for optimal operation, which is highly detrimental to their application. Here, we solve this problem by combining the delta-E effect with exchange biased multilayers and operate the resonator in a low-loss torsion mode. It is comprehensively analyzed experimentally and theoretically using various kinds of models. Due to the exchange bias, no external magnetic bias fields are required, but still low detection limits down to [Formula: see text] at 25 Hz are achieved. The potential of this concept is demonstrated with a new operating scheme that permits simultaneous measurement and localization, which is especially desirable for typical biomedical inverse solution problems. The sensor is localized with a minimum spatial resolution of 1 cm while measuring a low-frequency magnetic test signal that can be well reconstructed. Overall, we demonstrate that this class of magnetic field sensors is a significant step towards first biomedical applications and compact large number sensor arrays.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33674690     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  8 in total

1.  Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation.

Authors:  J Z Wang; S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Exchange biasing of magnetoelectric composites.

Authors:  Enno Lage; Christine Kirchhof; Viktor Hrkac; Lorenz Kienle; Robert Jahns; Reinhard Knöchel; Eckhard Quandt; Dirk Meyners
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 43.841

3.  Femtotesla atomic magnetometry in a microfabricated vapor cell.

Authors:  W Clark Griffith; Svenja Knappe; John Kitching
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Review of advanced techniques for the estimation of brain connectivity measured with EEG/MEG.

Authors:  V Sakkalis
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of magnetocardiography in coronary artery disease and cardiac arrhythmias: a review of clinical data.

Authors:  Joey S W Kwong; Boris Leithäuser; Jai-Wun Park; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-19       Impact factor: 4.164

6.  Added diagnostic value of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients suspected for epilepsy, where previous, extensive EEG workup was unrevealing.

Authors:  Lene Duez; Sándor Beniczky; Hatice Tankisi; Peter Orm Hansen; Per Sidenius; Anne Sabers; Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Multi-sensor magnetoencephalography with atomic magnetometers.

Authors:  Cort N Johnson; P D D Schwindt; M Weisend
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Self-biased 215 MHz magnetoelectric NEMS resonator for ultra-sensitive DC magnetic field detection.

Authors:  Tianxiang Nan; Yu Hui; Matteo Rinaldi; Nian X Sun
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Curvature and Stress Effects on the Performance of Contour-Mode Resonant ΔE Effect Magnetometers.

Authors:  Alexei D Matyushov; Benjamin Spetzler; Mohsen Zaeimbashi; James Zhou; Zhenyun Qian; Elizaveta V Golubeva; Cheng Tu; Yingxue Guo; Brian F Chen; Damo Wang; Alexandria Will-Cole; Huaihao Chen; Matteo Rinaldi; Jeffrey McCord; Franz Faupel; Nian X Sun
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-06-27

2.  Modeling and Parameter Sensitivity Improvement in ΔE-Effect Magnetic Sensor Based on Mode Localization Effect.

Authors:  Haoqi Lyu; Zheng Wang; Wuhao Yang; Xingyin Xiong; Zhenxi Liu; Xudong Zou
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.523

3.  Thin-Film-Based SAW Magnetic Field Sensors.

Authors:  Jana Marie Meyer; Viktor Schell; Jingxiang Su; Simon Fichtner; Erdem Yarar; Florian Niekiel; Thorsten Giese; Anne Kittmann; Lars Thormählen; Vadim Lebedev; Stefan Moench; Agnė Žukauskaitė; Eckhard Quandt; Fabian Lofink
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Active Magnetoelectric Motion Sensing: Examining Performance Metrics with an Experimental Setup.

Authors:  Johannes Hoffmann; Eric Elzenheimer; Christin Bald; Clint Hansen; Walter Maetzler; Gerhard Schmidt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Quantitative Evaluation for Magnetoelectric Sensor Systems in Biomagnetic Diagnostics.

Authors:  Eric Elzenheimer; Christin Bald; Erik Engelhardt; Johannes Hoffmann; Patrick Hayes; Johan Arbustini; Andreas Bahr; Eckhard Quandt; Michael Höft; Gerhard Schmidt
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.