Lene Duez1, Sándor Beniczky2, Hatice Tankisi3, Peter Orm Hansen3, Per Sidenius4, Anne Sabers5, Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen3. 1. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: leneduez@aarhus.rm.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Danish Epilepsy Centre, Dianalund, Denmark. 3. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet-Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the possible additional diagnostic yield of MEG in the workup of patients with suspected epilepsy, where repeated EEGs, including sleep-recordings failed to identify abnormalities. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of epilepsy and at least three normal EEGs, including sleep-EEG, were prospectively analyzed. The reference standard was inferred from the diagnosis obtained from the medical charts, after at least one-year follow-up. MEG (306-channel, whole-head) and simultaneous EEG (MEG-EEG) was recorded for one hour. The added sensitivity of MEG was calculated from the cases where abnormalities were seen in MEG but not EEG. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had the diagnosis epilepsy according to the reference standard. MEG-EEG detected abnormalities, and supported the diagnosis in nine of the 22 patients with the diagnosis epilepsy at one-year follow-up. Sensitivity of MEG-EEG was 41%. The added sensitivity of MEG was 18%. MEG-EEG was normal in 28 of the 30 patients categorized as 'not epilepsy' at one year follow-up, yielding a specificity of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: MEG provides additional diagnostic information in patients suspected for epilepsy, where repeated EEG recordings fail to demonstrate abnormality. SIGNIFICANCE: MEG should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients where the conventional, widely available methods are unrevealing.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the possible additional diagnostic yield of MEG in the workup of patients with suspected epilepsy, where repeated EEGs, including sleep-recordings failed to identify abnormalities. METHODS: Fifty-two consecutive patients with clinical suspicion of epilepsy and at least three normal EEGs, including sleep-EEG, were prospectively analyzed. The reference standard was inferred from the diagnosis obtained from the medical charts, after at least one-year follow-up. MEG (306-channel, whole-head) and simultaneous EEG (MEG-EEG) was recorded for one hour. The added sensitivity of MEG was calculated from the cases where abnormalities were seen in MEG but not EEG. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients had the diagnosis epilepsy according to the reference standard. MEG-EEG detected abnormalities, and supported the diagnosis in nine of the 22 patients with the diagnosis epilepsy at one-year follow-up. Sensitivity of MEG-EEG was 41%. The added sensitivity of MEG was 18%. MEG-EEG was normal in 28 of the 30 patients categorized as 'not epilepsy' at one year follow-up, yielding a specificity of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: MEG provides additional diagnostic information in patients suspected for epilepsy, where repeated EEG recordings fail to demonstrate abnormality. SIGNIFICANCE: MEG should be included in the diagnostic workup of patients where the conventional, widely available methods are unrevealing.
Authors: B Spetzler; C Bald; P Durdaut; J Reermann; C Kirchhof; A Teplyuk; D Meyners; E Quandt; M Höft; G Schmidt; F Faupel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 4.379