Literature DB >> 33674675

A randomized controlled trial on the effects induced by robot-assisted and usual-care rehabilitation on upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke subjects.

T Lencioni1, L Fornia2, T Bowman3, A Marzegan3, A Caronni3, A Turolla4, J Jonsdottir3, I Carpinella3, M Ferrarin3.   

Abstract

Muscle synergies are hypothesized to reflect connections among motoneurons in the spinal cord activated by central commands and sensory feedback. Robotic rehabilitation of upper limb in post-stroke subjects has shown promising results in terms of improvement of arm function and motor control achieved by reassembling muscle synergies into a set more similar to that of healthy people. However, in stroke survivors the potentially neurophysiological changes induced by robot-mediated learning versus usual care have not yet been investigated. We quantified upper limb motor deficits and the changes induced by rehabilitation in 32 post-stroke subjects through the movement analysis of two virtual untrained tasks of object placing and pronation. The sample analyzed in this study is part of a larger bi-center study and included all subjects who underwent kinematic analysis and were randomized into robot and usual care groups. Post-stroke subjects who followed robotic rehabilitation showed larger improvements in axial-to-proximal muscle synergies with respect to those who underwent usual care. This was associated to a significant improvement of the proximal kinematics. Both treatments had negative effects in muscle synergies controlling the distal district. This study supports the definition of new rehabilitative treatments for improving the neurophysiological recovery after stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33674675      PMCID: PMC7935882          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84536-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  55 in total

1.  Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction.

Authors:  R D Jones; I M Donaldson; P J Parkin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Julie Bernhardt; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Erik H Hoyer; Pablo A Celnik
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.

Authors:  Alex Pollock; Sybil E Farmer; Marian C Brady; Peter Langhorne; Gillian E Mead; Jan Mehrholz; Frederike van Wijck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-12

5.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the 'affected' and 'unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke.

Authors:  R Traversa; P Cicinelli; P Pasqualetti; M Filippi; P M Rossini
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-08-24       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery.

Authors:  Brandon Rohrer; Susan Fasoli; Hermano Igo Krebs; Richard Hughes; Bruce Volpe; Walter R Frontera; Joel Stein; Neville Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Representation of Muscle Synergies in the Primate Brain.

Authors:  Simon A Overduin; Andrea d'Avella; Jinsook Roh; Jose M Carmena; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation.

Authors:  Paweł Maciejasz; Jörg Eschweiler; Kurt Gerlach-Hahn; Arne Jansen-Troy; Steffen Leonhardt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 9.  Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke.

Authors:  Jan Mehrholz; Marcus Pohl; Thomas Platz; Joachim Kugler; Bernhard Elsner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-07

10.  Evaluating upper limb impairments in multiple sclerosis by exposure to different mechanical environments.

Authors:  Laura Pellegrino; Martina Coscia; Margit Muller; Claudio Solaro; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of Hemispheric Stroke Localization on the Reorganization of Arm Movements within Different Mechanical Environments.

Authors:  Laura Pellegrino; Martina Coscia; Camilla Pierella; Psiche Giannoni; Amel Cherif; Maddalena Mugnosso; Lucio Marinelli; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-23

2.  Muscle Synergies and Clinical Outcome Measures Describe Different Factors of Upper Limb Motor Function in Stroke Survivors Undergoing Rehabilitation in a Virtual Reality Environment.

Authors:  Lorenza Maistrello; Daniele Rimini; Vincent C K Cheung; Giorgia Pregnolato; Andrea Turolla
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  The effects of robotic assistance on upper limb spatial muscle synergies in healthy people during planar upper-limb training.

Authors:  Adriana Cancrini; Paolo Baitelli; Matteo Lavit Nicora; Matteo Malosio; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Alessandro Scano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Biomechanical assessment of the ipsilesional upper limb in post-stroke patients during multi-joint reaching tasks: A quantitative study.

Authors:  Alessandro Scano; Eleonora Guanziroli; Robert M Mira; Cristina Brambilla; Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti; Franco Molteni
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-28

5.  A unified scheme for the benchmarking of upper limb functions in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Valeria Longatelli; Diego Torricelli; Jesús Tornero; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Franco Molteni; José L Pons; Marta Gandolla
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 5.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.