Literature DB >> 33673935

Cardiorespiratory Fitness Attenuates the Impact of Risk Factors Associated With COVID-19 Hospitalization.

Dennis J Kerrigan1, Clinton A Brawner1, Jonathan K Ehrman1, Steven Keteyian2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33673935      PMCID: PMC7817471          DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: As highlighted in the editorial “Fit Is It in COVID-19, Future Pandemics, and Overall Healthy Living,” published in the January 2021 issue of the Mayo Clinic Proceedings, it is important to bring more awareness to cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) as an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality. To that end, we present additional data regarding the interaction of CRF with the traditional risk factors often associated with increased illness severity from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Details regarding the methods and data extraction can be found in Brawner et al. Briefly, 246 patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and completed a clinically indicated stress test between January 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively identified. Hospitalization for COVID-19 was identified through July 2020. Using logistic regression, in univariate analyses we found that 8 of 13 previously identified risk factors were associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalization due to COVID-19 (Table ). However, when adjusted for CRF (ie, peak metabolic equivalents of task) in a multivariable analysis, only age (≥65 years), male sex, and chronic kidney disease remained as significant predictors (Table).
Table

Effect of Fitness on the Relationship Between Select Variables and Likelihood of Complications Due to COVID-19a

VariableUnivariate analyses
Adjusted for peak METs
Wald X2POR (95% CI)Wald X2POR (95% CI)
Age ≥65 years18.3<.0013.31 (1.91 to 5.73)10.8.0012.65 (1.48 to 4.74)
Male3.9.0481.70 (1.00 to 2.88)8.1.0042.29 (1.30 to 4.05)
Asthma0.5.491.28 (0.64 to 2.57)0.6.431.34 (0.74 to 0.92)
Obesityb2.2.130.67 (0.39 to 1.13)3.9.0480.57 (0.33 to 0.995)
CKD7.9.0055.39 (1.66 to 17.5)4.6.033.76 (1.12 to 12.7)
DM4.8.031.83 (1.06 to 3.13)2.6.111.57 (0.90 to 2.75)
COPD1.4.232.28 (0.60 to 8.71)0.7.411.78 (0.46 to 6.95)
CHD4.5.032.48 (1.07 to 5.72)3.6.062.31 (0.98 to 5.47)
Cancer3.8.052.26 (0.99 to 5.12)2.6.112.00 (0.87 to 4.62)
HTN5.0.031.95 (1.09 to 3.50)1.9.161.55 (0.84 to 2.85)
Stroke0.04.830.88 (0.26 to 3.00)0.3.590.70 (0.20 to 2.49)
Smoking0.15.700.86 (0.41 to 1.82)0.1.790.90 (0.42 to 1.94)
HF4.6.033.42 (1.11 to 10.55)1.9.162.29 (0.71 to 7.35)

CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; HTN, hypertension; MET, metabolic equivalents of task; OR, odds ratio.

BMI≥30 kg/m2.

Effect of Fitness on the Relationship Between Select Variables and Likelihood of Complications Due to COVID-19a CHD, coronary heart disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; DM, diabetes mellitus; HF, heart failure; HTN, hypertension; MET, metabolic equivalents of task; OR, odds ratio. BMI≥30 kg/m2. These results show how CRF improves the risk profile of higher-risk individuals and builds upon other studies that have reported similar findings.3, 4, 5 Although our limited sample size may have contributed to the large confidence intervals in the adjusted analysis, it is important to note that fitness attenuated the point estimate for all of the comorbidities that were significant in univariate analyses. Surprisingly, in the univariate analysis, obesity was not associated with increased hospital risk and when CRF was introduced as a covariate it showed a paradoxical protective effect. This finding may simply be due to the nature of the cohort in this study, which consisted of individuals who were able to perform an exercise stress test on a treadmill. With respect to obesity showing a paradoxical protective effect, this has been reported previously and may again speak to the interaction between CRF and body mass index, with more fit individuals potentially having greater muscle mass, which body mass index does not differentiate. In conclusion, our study shows the value of including CRF as an additional health indicator and adds to the importance of the public health message of the benefits of fitness and exercise, particularly for attenuating the risk associated with other health disorders. When performing risk stratification for research or clinical purposes, efforts should be made to include a measure of CRF.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness as major markers of cardiovascular risk: their independent and interwoven importance to health status.

Authors:  Jonathan Myers; Paul McAuley; Carl J Lavie; Jean-Pierre Despres; Ross Arena; Peter Kokkinos
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 2.  The Interaction of Cardiorespiratory Fitness With Obesity and the Obesity Paradox in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Ahmet Afşin Oktay; Carl J Lavie; Peter F Kokkinos; Parham Parto; Ambarish Pandey; Hector O Ventura
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 8.194

Review 3.  Importance of Assessing Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Clinical Practice: A Case for Fitness as a Clinical Vital Sign: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Robert Ross; Steven N Blair; Ross Arena; Timothy S Church; Jean-Pierre Després; Barry A Franklin; William L Haskell; Leonard A Kaminsky; Benjamin D Levine; Carl J Lavie; Jonathan Myers; Josef Niebauer; Robert Sallis; Susumu S Sawada; Xuemei Sui; Ulrik Wisløff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Physical Activity and Mortality Across Levels of Adiposity: A Prospective Cohort Study From the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Miguel A Sanchez-Lastra; Ding Ding; Knut-Eirik Dalene; Ulf Ekelund; Jakob Tarp
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 5.  Fitness vs. fatness on all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vaughn W Barry; Meghan Baruth; Michael W Beets; J Larry Durstine; Jihong Liu; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 8.194

6.  Fit Is It in COVID-19, Future Pandemics, and Overall Healthy Living.

Authors:  Carl J Lavie; Fabian Sanchis-Gomar; Ross Arena
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Inverse Relationship of Maximal Exercise Capacity to Hospitalization Secondary to Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Clinton A Brawner; Jonathan K Ehrman; Shane Bole; Dennis J Kerrigan; Sachin S Parikh; Barry K Lewis; Ryan M Gindi; Courtland Keteyian; Khaled Abdul-Nour; Steven J Keteyian
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 7.616

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Why are COVID-19 effects less severe in Sub-Saharan Africa? Moving more and sitting less may be a primary reason.

Authors:  Lucy-Joy Wachira; Ross Arena; James F Sallis; Estelle V Lambert; Otieno Martin Ong'wen; Deepika R Laddu; Vincent Onywera; Adewale L Oyeyemi
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 11.278

2.  Estimated Oxygen Consumption with the Abbreviated Method and Its Association with Vaccination and PCR Tests for COVID-19 from Socio-Demographic, Anthropometric, Lifestyle, and Morbidity Outcomes in Chilean Adults.

Authors:  Jaime Vásquez-Gómez; César Faúndez-Casanova; Ricardo Souza de Carvalho; Franklin Castillo-Retamal; Pedro Valenzuela Reyes; Yeny Concha-Cisternas; Pablo Luna-Villouta; Cristian Álvarez; Andrés Godoy-Cumillaf; Claudio Hernández-Mosqueira; Igor Cigarroa; Alex Garrido-Méndez; Carlos Matus-Castillo; Marcelo Castillo-Retamal; Ivana Leao Ribeiro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  High fitness levels attenuate the increased risk of heart failure due to low socioeconomic status: A cohort study.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Sae Young Jae; Timo H Mäkikallio; Jari A Laukkanen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.722

4.  Covid-19 and the next outbreak: decreasing frailty by using mild stress?

Authors:  Eric Le Bourg
Journal:  Biogerontology       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.284

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.