Literature DB >> 33673533

Relative Contribution of Citizen Science, Museum Data and Publications in Delineating the Distribution of the Stag Beetle in Spain.

Marcos Méndez1, Fernando Cortés-Fossati1.   

Abstract

Reliable distribution maps are in the basis of insect conservation, but detailed chorological information is lacking for many insects of conservation concern (the Wallacean shortfall). Museum collections, entomological publications and citizen science projects can contribute to solve this Wallacean shortfall. Their relative contribution to the knowledge on the distribution of threatened insects has been scarcely explored, but it is important given that each of these three sources of information has its own biases and costs. Here we explore the contribution of museum data, entomological publications and citizen science in delineating the distribution of the European stag beetle in Spain. Citizen science contributed the highest number of records and grid cells occupied, as well as the highest number of grid cells not contributed by any other information source (unique grid cells). Nevertheless, both museum data and publications contributed almost 25% of all unique grid cells. Furthermore, the relative contribution of each source of information differed in importance among Spanish provinces. Given the pros and cons of museum data, publications and citizen science, we advise their combined use in cases, such as the European stag beetle in Spain, in which a broad, heterogeneous, sparsely populated territory has to be prospected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lucanus cervus; Wallacean shortfall; crisis of faunistic entomology; historical data; insect conservation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33673533      PMCID: PMC7997236          DOI: 10.3390/insects12030202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Insects        ISSN: 2075-4450            Impact factor:   2.769


  11 in total

1.  The importance of the natural sciences to conservation: (an American Society of Naturalists symposium paper).

Authors:  Paul K Dayton
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  Biological collections and ecological/environmental research: a review, some observations and a look to the future.

Authors:  Graham H Pyke; Paul R Ehrlich
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2009-11-24

3.  Museums, collections and biodiversity inventories.

Authors:  P Alberch
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 4.  Using insect natural history collections to study global change impacts: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Heather M Kharouba; Jayme M M Lewthwaite; Rob Guralnick; Jeremy T Kerr; Mark Vellend
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Why do bugs perish? Range size and local vulnerability traits as surrogates of Odonata extinction risk.

Authors:  Maya Rocha-Ortega; Pilar Rodríguez; Jason Bried; John Abbott; Alex Córdoba-Aguilar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Natural history collections and the future legacy of ecological research.

Authors:  Rodrigo B Salvador; Carlo M Cunha
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe.

Authors:  Dirk S Schmeller; Pierre-Yves Henry; Romain Julliard; Bernd Gruber; Jean Clobert; Frank Dziock; Szabolcs Lengyel; Piotr Nowicki; Eszter Déri; Eduardas Budrys; Tiiu Kull; Kadri Tali; Bianca Bauch; Josef Settele; Chris Van Swaay; Andrej Kobler; Valerija Babij; Eva Papastergiadou; Klaus Henle
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 6.560

8.  Distorted views of biodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Boakes; Philip J K McGowan; Richard A Fuller; Ding Chang-qing; Natalie E Clark; Kim O'Connor; Georgina M Mace
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  The relevance, biases, and importance of digitising opportunistic non-standardised collections: A case study in Iberian harvestmen fauna with BOS Arthropod Collection datasets (Arachnida, Opiliones).

Authors:  Izaskun Merino-Sáinz; Antonio Torralba-Burrial; Araceli Anadón
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 1.546

10.  Regional insect inventories require long time, extensive spatial sampling and good will.

Authors:  Simone Fattorini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.