Literature DB >> 33672908

Backstroke to Breaststroke Turning Performance in Age-Group Swimmers: Hydrodynamic Characteristics and Pull-Out Strategy.

Phornpot Chainok1,2, Leandro Machado2, Karla de Jesus2,3, J Arturo Abraldes4, Márcio Borgonovo-Santos2, Ricardo J Fernandes2, João Paulo Vilas-Boas2.   

Abstract

We compared the hydrodynamic characteristics and pull-out strategies of four backstroke-to-breaststroke turning techniques in young swimmers. Eighteen 11 and 12-year-old swimmers participated in a 4 week intervention program including 16 contextual interference sessions. The hydrodynamic variables were assessed through inverse dynamics, and the pull-out strategy kinematics were assessed with tracking markers followed by 12 land cameras and 11 underwater cameras. Swimmers randomly completed sixteen 30 m maximal backstroke-to breaststroke-open, somersault, bucket and crossover turns (four in each technique) with a 3 min rest. The data showed higher drag force, cross-sectional area and drag coefficient values for the first (compared with the second) gliding position. The crossover turn revealed the highest push-off velocity (2.17 ± 0.05 m·s-1), and the somersault turn demonstrated the lowest foot plant index (0.68 ± 0.03; 68%), which could have affected the first gliding, transition and second gliding depths (0.73 ± 0.13, 0.86 ± 0.17 and 0.76 ± 0.17 m). The data revealed the consistency of the time spent (4.86 ± 0.98 s) and breakout distance (6.04 ± 0.94 m) among the four turning techniques, and no differences were observed between them regarding time and average velocity up to 7.5 m. The hydrodynamic characteristics and pull-out strategy of the backstroke-to-breaststroke turns performed by the age group swimmers were independent of the selected technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age group; drag; hydrodynamics; strategy; swimming

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33672908      PMCID: PMC7918682          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  15 in total

1.  Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning.

Authors:  Mark A Guadagnoli; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Analysis of the lateral push-off in the freestyle flip turn.

Authors:  Luciana Araujo; Suzana Pereira; Roberta Gatti; Elinai Freitas; Gabriel Jacomel; Helio Roesler; Joao Villas-Boas
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Determination of the drag coefficient during the first and second gliding positions of the breaststroke underwater stroke.

Authors:  J Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ligia Costa; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Ribeiro; Pedro Figueiredo; Daniel Marinho; António J Silva; Abel Rouboa; Leandro Machado
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Performance level differences in swimming: a meta-analysis of passive drag force.

Authors:  Rod Havriluk
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Active and passive drag: the role of trunk incline.

Authors:  P Zamparo; G Gatta; D Pendergast; C Capelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Hydrodynamic glide efficiency in swimming.

Authors:  Roozbeh Naemi; William J Easson; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.319

7.  Modulation of upper limb joint work and power during sculling while ballasted with varying loads.

Authors:  Jessy Lauer; Annie Hélène Rouard; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Computational fluid dynamics vs. inverse dynamics methods to determine passive drag in two breaststroke glide positions.

Authors:  L Costa; V R Mantha; A J Silva; R J Fernandes; D A Marinho; J P Vilas-Boas; L Machado; A Rouboa
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude.

Authors:  J C Chatard; B Bourgoin; J R Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

10.  A Biophysical Analysis on the Arm Stroke Efficiency in Front Crawl Swimming: Comparing Methods and Determining the Main Performance Predictors.

Authors:  Ricardo Peterson Silveira; Susana Maria Soares; Rodrigo Zacca; Francisco B Alves; Ricardo J Fernandes; Flávio Antônio de Souza Castro; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Backstroke-to-Breaststroke Turns Muscular Activity. A Study Conducted in Age Group Swimmers.

Authors:  Phornpot Chainok; Jessy Lauer; Pedro Gonçalves; Karla de Jesus; Ricardo J Fernandes; Joao Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.017

2.  Biomechanical Features of Backstroke to Breaststroke Transition Techniques in Age-Group Swimmers.

Authors:  Phornpot Chainok; Karla de Jesus; Luis Mourão; Pedro Filipe Pereira Fonseca; Rodrigo Zacca; Ricardo J Fernandes; João Paulo Vilas-Boas
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-10

Review 3.  Kinematic Analysis of the Underwater Undulatory Swimming Cycle: A Systematic and Synthetic Review.

Authors:  Santiago Veiga; Jorge Lorenzo; Alfonso Trinidad; Robin Pla; Andrea Fallas-Campos; Alfonso de la Rubia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.