Literature DB >> 2303045

Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude.

J C Chatard1, B Bourgoin, J R Lacour.   

Abstract

The passive drag (Dp) of 218 competitive swimmers was studied and related to their performance level. To study this relationship, specific attention was given to anthropometric and joint laxity (JL) variations. The Dp was measured at 1.40 m.s-1, using a mechanical winch and a strain gauge with a load cell connected to a strain bridge. Swimmers were towed in a prone position holding their breath after a maximal inspiration. Buoyancy was evaluated by the hydrostatic lift (HL), i.e., the maximal weight just necessary to maintain the swimmer in a balanced position under the water after a maximal inspiration. The JL was assessed by a standard scoring system. The Dp was related mainly to the surface area (SA) (r = 0.73 and 0.53; P less than 0.01, for males and females, respectively). For a given SA, Dp was inversely related to the performance level. The JL explained 7% of the variability of Dp. On average, Dp measured after a maximal expiration, increases of about 22% SD 3% (P less than 0.01). This increase was related to individual vital capacities (r = 0.86, P less than 0.01). As Dp was mainly related to SA and HL, it is suggested that the body exerts a large pressure effect on the water. The contribution to performance might be related to the gliding phase of swimming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2303045     DOI: 10.1007/bf02388619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  10 in total

1.  Experimental study of the performance of competition swimmers.

Authors:  J P Charbonnier; J R Lacour; J Riffat; R Flandrois
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1975-08-15

2.  PERSISTENT JOINT LAXITY AND CONGENITAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP.

Authors:  C CARTER; J WILKINSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1964-02

3.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

4.  An estimation of drag in front crawl swimming.

Authors:  A J van der Vaart; H H Savelberg; G de Groot; A P Hollander; H M Toussaint; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Measurement of active drag during crawl arm stroke swimming.

Authors:  A P Hollander; G De Groot; G J van Ingen Schenau; H M Toussaint; H De Best; W Peeters; A Meulemans; A W Schreurs
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.337

6.  Physiology of swimming man.

Authors:  I Holmér
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand Suppl       Date:  1974

7.  Energetics of swimming in man.

Authors:  P E Di Prampero; D R Pendergast; D W Wilson; D W Rennie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  Biological characteristics of young swimmers, tennis players and non-competitors.

Authors:  J Bloomfield; B A Blanksby; D F Beard; T R Ackland; B C Elliott
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 13.800

9.  Joint laxity in selected athletic populations.

Authors:  D A Brodie; H A Bird; V Wright
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Quantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and women.

Authors:  D R Pendergast; P E Di Prampero; A B Craig; D R Wilson; D W Rennie
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1977-09
  10 in total
  14 in total

1.  Factors affecting swimming economy in children and adults.

Authors:  Per-Ludvik Kjendlie; Frank Ingjer; Robert Keig Stallman; James Stray-Gundersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-08       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Active and passive drag: the role of trunk incline.

Authors:  P Zamparo; G Gatta; D Pendergast; C Capelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Analysis of determinants of swimming economy in front crawl.

Authors:  J C Chatard; J M Lavoie; J R Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Effects of wetsuit use in swimming events. Practical recommendations.

Authors:  J C Chatard; G Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  The energy cost of swimming and its determinants.

Authors:  Paola Zamparo; Matteo Cortesi; Giorgio Gatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Analysis of performance of prepubertal swimmers assessed from anthropometric and bio-energetic characteristics.

Authors:  P Duché; G Falgairette; M Bedu; G Lac; A Robert; J Coudert
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

7.  Elite swimmers do not exhibit a body mass index trade-off across a wide range of event distances.

Authors:  Christian M Gagnon; Michael E Steiper; Herman Pontzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Searching for criteria in evaluating the monofin swimming turn from the perspective of coaching and improving technique.

Authors:  Marek Rejman; Grażyna Borowska
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Backstroke technical characterization of 11-13 year-old swimmers.

Authors:  Ana Filipa Silva; Pedro Figueiredo; Ludovic Seifert; Susana Soares; João Paulo Vilas-Boas; Ricardo J Fernandes
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  The interplay between propelling efficiency, hydrodynamic position and energy cost of front crawl in 8 to 19-year-old swimmers.

Authors:  P Zamparo; S Lazzer; C Antoniazzi; S Cedolin; R Avon; C Lesa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.