Literature DB >> 33671814

Quantitative Approach to Fish Cytogenetics in the Context of Vertebrate Genome Evolution.

Veronika Borůvková1, W Mike Howell2, Dominik Matoulek1, Radka Symonová3.   

Abstract

Our novel Python-based tool EVANGELIST allows the visualization of GC and repeats percentages along chromosomes in sequenced genomes and has enabled us to perform quantitative large-scale analyses on the chromosome level in fish and other vertebrates. This is a different approach from the prevailing analyses, i.e., analyses of GC% in the coding sequences that make up not more than 2% in human. We identified GC content (GC%) elevations in microchromosomes in ancient fish lineages similar to avian microchromosomes and a large variability in the relationship between the chromosome size and their GC% across fish lineages. This raises the question as to what extent does the chromosome size drive GC% as posited by the currently accepted explanation based on the recombination rate. We ascribe the differences found across fishes to varying GC% of repetitive sequences. Generally, our results suggest that the GC% of repeats and proportion of repeats are independent of the chromosome size. This leaves an open space for another mechanism driving the GC evolution in vertebrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GC content; GC-biased gene conversion; chromosome size; linkage group; microchromosomes

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33671814      PMCID: PMC7926999          DOI: 10.3390/genes12020312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes (Basel)        ISSN: 2073-4425            Impact factor:   4.096


  55 in total

Review 1.  GC-biased gene conversion links the recombination landscape and demography to genomic base composition: GC-biased gene conversion drives genomic base composition across a wide range of species.

Authors:  Carina F Mugal; Claudia C Weber; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.345

2.  Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Devon E Pearse; Nicola J Barson; Torfinn Nome; Guangtu Gao; Matthew A Campbell; Alicia Abadía-Cardoso; Eric C Anderson; David E Rundio; Thomas H Williams; Kerry A Naish; Thomas Moen; Sixin Liu; Matthew Kent; Michel Moser; David R Minkley; Eric B Rondeau; Marine S O Brieuc; Simen Rød Sandve; Michael R Miller; Lucydalila Cedillo; Kobi Baruch; Alvaro G Hernandez; Gil Ben-Zvi; Doron Shem-Tov; Omer Barad; Kirill Kuzishchin; John Carlos Garza; Steven T Lindley; Ben F Koop; Gary H Thorgaard; Yniv Palti; Sigbjørn Lien
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Population size and genome size in fishes: a closer look.

Authors:  T Ryan Gregory; Jonathan D S Witt
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.166

Review 4.  Is There an Upper Limit to Genome Size?

Authors:  Oriane Hidalgo; Jaume Pellicer; Maarten Christenhusz; Harald Schneider; Andrew R Leitch; Ilia J Leitch
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 18.313

Review 5.  Mechanisms of chromosome banding and implications for chromosome structure.

Authors:  D E Comings
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 16.830

6.  Isochore patterns and gene distributions in fish genomes.

Authors:  Maria Costantini; Fabio Auletta; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization.

Authors:  Sigbjørn Lien; Ben F Koop; Simen R Sandve; Jason R Miller; Matthew P Kent; Torfinn Nome; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Jong S Leong; David R Minkley; Aleksey Zimin; Fabian Grammes; Harald Grove; Arne Gjuvsland; Brian Walenz; Russell A Hermansen; Kris von Schalburg; Eric B Rondeau; Alex Di Genova; Jeevan K A Samy; Jon Olav Vik; Magnus D Vigeland; Lis Caler; Unni Grimholt; Sissel Jentoft; Dag Inge Våge; Pieter de Jong; Thomas Moen; Matthew Baranski; Yniv Palti; Douglas R Smith; James A Yorke; Alexander J Nederbragt; Ave Tooming-Klunderud; Kjetill S Jakobsen; Xuanting Jiang; Dingding Fan; Yan Hu; David A Liberles; Rodrigo Vidal; Patricia Iturra; Steven J M Jones; Inge Jonassen; Alejandro Maass; Stig W Omholt; William S Davidson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Intra-genomic GC heterogeneity in sauropsids: evolutionary insights from cDNA mapping and GC(3) profiling in snake.

Authors:  Kazumi Matsubara; Shigehiro Kuraku; Hiroshi Tarui; Osamu Nishimura; Chizuko Nishida; Kiyokazu Agata; Yoshinori Kumazawa; Yoichi Matsuda
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  The GC-heterogeneity of teleost fishes.

Authors:  Christelle Melodelima; Christian Gautier
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  On the genome base composition of teleosts: the effect of environment and lifestyle.

Authors:  Andrea Tarallo; Claudia Angelini; Remo Sanges; Mitsuharu Yagi; Claudio Agnisola; Giuseppe D'Onofrio
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Fish Cytogenetics: Present and Future.

Authors:  Anna Rita Rossi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.096

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.