Literature DB >> 33669773

Looking for Hidden Enemies of Metabarcoding: Species Composition, Habitat and Management Can Strongly Influence DNA Extraction while Examining Grassland Communities.

Anna Rucińska1, Marcin Olszak1,2, Sebastian Świerszcz1,3, Marcin Nobis4,5, Szymon Zubek4, Grzegorz Kusza6, Maja Boczkowska1,7, Arkadiusz Nowak1,6.   

Abstract

Despite the raising preoccupation, the critical question of how the plant community is composed belowground still remains unresolved, particularly for the conservation priority types of vegetation. The usefulness of metabarcoding analysis of the belowground parts of the plant community is subjected to a considerable bias, that often impedes detection of all species in a sample due to insufficient DNA quality or quantity. In the presented study we have attempted to find environmental factors that determine the amount and quality of DNA extracted from total plant tissue from above- and belowground samples (1000 and 10,000 cm2). We analyzed the influence of land use intensity, soil properties, species composition, and season on DNA extraction. The most important factors for DNA quality were vegetation type, soil conductometry (EC), and soil pH for the belowground samples. The species that significantly decreased the DNA quality were Calamagrostis epigejos, Coronilla varia, and Holcus lanatus. For the aboveground part of the vegetation, the season, management intensity, and certain species-with the most prominent being Centaurea rhenana and Cirsium canum-have the highest influence. Additionally, we found that sample size, soil granulation, MgO, organic C, K2O, and total soil N content are important for DNA extraction effectiveness. Both low EC and pH reduce significantly the yield and quality of DNA. Identifying the potential inhibitors of DNA isolation and predicting difficulties of sampling the vegetation plots for metabarcoding analysis will help to optimize the universal, low-cost multi-stage DNA extraction procedure in molecular ecology studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central Europe; DNA extraction; DNA quality; belowground diversity; graminoid vegetation; roots

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33669773      PMCID: PMC7921978          DOI: 10.3390/biom11020318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomolecules        ISSN: 2218-273X


  53 in total

1.  Assessing the Utility of Soil DNA Extraction Kits for Increasing DNA Yields and Eliminating PCR Inhibitors from Buried Skeletal Remains.

Authors:  Lisa M Hebda; David R Foran
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 2.  Nonstructural carbon in woody plants.

Authors:  Michael C Dietze; Anna Sala; Mariah S Carbone; Claudia I Czimczik; Joshua A Mantooth; Andrew D Richardson; Rodrigo Vargas
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 26.379

Review 3.  Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores.

Authors:  Abdul Rashid War; Michael Gabriel Paulraj; Tariq Ahmad; Abdul Ahad Buhroo; Barkat Hussain; Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu; Hari Chand Sharma
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-08-20

Review 4.  To survive or to slay: Resource-foraging role of metabolites implicated in allelopathy.

Authors:  Nishanth Tharayil
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2009-07-03

5.  A plant cocktail amenable for PCR-based genetic analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Simeon O Kotchoni; Emma W Gachomo; Jose C Jimenez-Lopez
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches.

Authors:  Tom O Delmont; Patrick Robe; Ian Clark; Pascal Simonet; Timothy M Vogel
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.363

7.  An optimized protocol for DNA extraction in plants with a high content of secondary metabolites, based on leaves of Mimosa tenuiflora (Willd.) Poir. (Leguminosae).

Authors:  S R Arruda; D G Pereira; M M Silva-Castro; M G Brito; A M Waldschmidt
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2017-07-06

8.  DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition.

Authors:  J Zhou; M A Bruns; J M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Plant DNA metabarcoding of lake sediments: How does it represent the contemporary vegetation.

Authors:  Inger Greve Alsos; Youri Lammers; Nigel Giles Yoccoz; Tina Jørgensen; Per Sjögren; Ludovic Gielly; Mary E Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Stress and defense responses in plant secondary metabolites production.

Authors:  Tasiu Isah
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.