Literature DB >> 33668868

Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12.

Umile Giuseppe Longo1, Sergio De Salvatore1, Ilaria Piergentili1, Anna Indiveri2, Calogero Di Naro1, Giulia Santamaria2, Anna Marchetti2, Maria Grazia De Marinis2, Vincenzo Denaro1.   

Abstract

The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a valid patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess prosthesis awareness during daily activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference that is evaluated as beneficial and could change the patient's clinical management. The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is considered the minimum PROMs cut-off value that corresponds to a patient's satisfactory state of health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been already demonstrated, the MCID and the PASS of this score have not previously been defined. Patients undergoing THA from January 2019 to October 2019 were assessed pre-operatively and six months post-surgery using the FJS-12, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Pre-operative and follow-up questionnaires were completed by 50 patients. Both distribution-based approaches and anchor approaches were used to estimate MCID. The aim of this paper was to assess the MCID and PASS values of FJS-12 after total hip replacement. The FJS-12 MCID from baseline to 6 months post-operative follow-up was 17.5. The PASS calculated ranged from 69.8 to 91.7.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCID; forgotten joint score; hip replacement; minimal clinically important difference; patient acceptable symptom state; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33668868      PMCID: PMC7956707          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  45 in total

Review 1.  Sport injuries: a review of outcomes.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Nikolaos Gougoulias; Dennis Caine; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Johannes M Giesinger; Markus S Kuster
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Joint awareness after ACL reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes measured with the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Henrik Behrend; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes M Giesinger; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.

Authors:  C MacKay; N Clements; R Wong; A M Davis
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 5.  Hip scores: A current concept review.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Mauro Ciuffreda; Vincenzo Candela; Alessandra Berton; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Can We Help Patients Forget Their Joint? Determining a Threshold for Successful Outcome for the Forgotten Joint Score.

Authors:  Philip J Rosinsky; Jeffrey W Chen; Ajay C Lall; Jacob Shapira; David R Maldonado; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Man Hung; Jerry Bounsanga; Maren W Voss; Charles L Saltzman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18

9.  Patient-acceptable symptom state for the Oxford Hip Score and Forgotten Joint Score at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years following total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study of 597 cases.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Lina Holm Ingelsrud; Isabella Florissi; David Shin; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Kirill Gromov; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Agreement between retrospectively and contemporaneously collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in hip and knee replacement patients.

Authors:  Esther Kwong; Jenny Neuburger; Nick Black
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  3 in total

1.  The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivek Singh; Thomas Bieganowski; Shengnan Huang; Raj Karia; Roy I Davidovitch; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-04

2.  Influence of Depression and Sleep Quality on Postoperative Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Alessandra Greco; Martina Marino; Giulia Santamaria; Ilaria Piergentili; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Epidemiology of revision hip replacement in Italy: a 15-year study.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Rocco Papalia; Giuseppe Salvatore; Salvatore Maria Tecce; Alexander Jedrzejczak; Martina Marcozzi; Ilaria Piergentili; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.030

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.