Literature DB >> 31506184

Can We Help Patients Forget Their Joint? Determining a Threshold for Successful Outcome for the Forgotten Joint Score.

Philip J Rosinsky1, Jeffrey W Chen1, Ajay C Lall1, Jacob Shapira1, David R Maldonado1, Benjamin G Domb1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinically important thresholds improve interpretability of patient-reported outcomes. A threshold for a successful outcome does not exist for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). The purpose of this study is to determine a threshold score for the FJS, 1 and 2 years after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 247 primary THA recipients between December 2012 and April 2017 was performed. A binary "successful treatment" was defined as achieving a composite criterion of pain, function, and satisfaction. Receiver operator characteristic analysis determined thresholds for successful outcome at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, subanalyzed by demographics. Results were validated by a 75th centile comparison. The ceiling effect of FJS was also assessed.
RESULTS: The average FJS was 70.06 ± 29.39 and 75.05 ± 28.73 at 1 and 2 years, respectively (P < .001). The proportion of patients meeting the composite criteria for success was 66.8% at 1 year and 76.5% at 2 years (P = .017). The receiver operator characteristic analysis for FJS at 1 and 2 years yielded excellent accuracy as defined by area under the curve (0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The threshold values were 73.96 and 69.79 at the respective time points. A mild ceiling effect was found with 16% and 23% of cases achieving a score of 100 at 1 and 2 years, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The FJS has excellent accuracy in demonstrating successful outcome following THA. The FJS threshold for success at 1 and 2 years postoperatively is 73.96 and 69.79, respectively. The higher rates of success at 2 years, along with a rise in the mean FJS, may indicate continued clinical improvement up to 2 years after THA.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forgotten Joint Score; accuracy; outcome; threshold; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31506184     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Tribology in hip arthroplasty : Benefits of different materials].

Authors:  J Philippe Kretzer; Maximilian Uhler; Sebastian Jäger; Therese Bormann; Robert Sonntag; Mareike Schonhoff; Stefan Schröder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Maximal Outcome Improvement Willingness Thresholds Are Predictive of a Patient's Willingness to Undergo the Same Surgery, in Retrospect, Given the Known Outcome of Their Primary Hip Arthroscopy.

Authors:  David R Maldonado; James D Fox; Cynthia Kyin; Andrew E Jimenez; Benjamin R Saks; Andrew J Curley; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-04-20

3.  Aseptic Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Modular Femoral Stem and a Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy-Treatment Assessment With the Forgotten Joint Score-12.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Calek; Thomas Schöfl; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Pia Zurmühle; Andreas Ladurner
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  CORR Insights®: Does Cup Position at the High Hip Center or Anatomic Hip Center in THA for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Result in Better Harris Hip Scores and Revision Incidence? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David R Maldonado
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A Medial Congruent Polyethylene Offers Satisfactory Early Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin M Frye; Caitlyn Patton; Jason A Kinney; T Ryan Murphy; Adam E Klein; Matthew J Dietz
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-01-19

6.  Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score 12.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Ilaria Piergentili; Anna Indiveri; Calogero Di Naro; Giulia Santamaria; Anna Marchetti; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Patient-acceptable symptom state for the Oxford Hip Score and Forgotten Joint Score at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years following total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study of 597 cases.

Authors:  Vincent P Galea; Lina Holm Ingelsrud; Isabella Florissi; David Shin; Charles R Bragdon; Henrik Malchau; Kirill Gromov; Anders Troelsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Henry Dunn; Geoff Rohlfing; Robert Kollmorgen
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-02

9.  Psychometric Assessment of Modified Harris Hip Score for Femoral Neck Fracture in Indian Population.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Shahrukh Khan Ataullah Pathan; Ravi Chandulal Makadia; Chintan Bahecharbhai Chaudhary
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Outpatient vs. inpatient hip arthroplasty: a matched case-control study on a 90-day complication rate and 2-year patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Philip J Rosinsky; Sarah L Chen; Mitchell J Yelton; Ajay C Lall; David R Maldonado; Jacob Shapira; Mitchell B Meghpara; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.