Literature DB >> 33668310

Does Science Literacy Guarantee Resistance to Health Rumors? The Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy of Science Literacy in the Relationship between Science Literacy and Rumor Belief.

Lingnan He1,2,3, Yue Chen1, Xiling Xiong4, Xiqian Zou5, Kaisheng Lai5.   

Abstract

Health rumors not only incite unnecessary fears and skepticism, but may also cause individuals to refuse effective remedy and thus delay their treatment. Studies have found that health literacy may help the public identify the falsity of health rumors and avoid their negative impact. However, whether other types of literacy work in helping people disbelieve health rumors is still unknown. With a national survey in China (N = 1646), our study examined the effect of science literacy on rumor belief and further analyzed the moderating role of self-efficacy of science literacy in their relationship. Hierarchical regression analysis showed that science literacy significantly decreased the likelihood of people believing in health rumors, and moderator analysis showed that self-efficacy of science literacy plays a moderating role in this relationship; such that the relationship between science literacy and health rumor belief would be weakened if one's self-efficacy of science literacy was low. This finding reveals that during campaigns to combat health rumors, improving and enhancing the self-efficacy of people's science literacy is an effective way to prevent them from believing in health rumors. Our study highlights the benefits of science education in public health and the improvement of public science literacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health rumor; science literacy; self-efficacy

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33668310      PMCID: PMC7967716          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  10 in total

Review 1.  Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.

Authors:  Stephan Lewandowsky; Ullrich K H Ecker; Colleen M Seifert; Norbert Schwarz; John Cook
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2012-12

3.  See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media.

Authors:  Leticia Bode; Emily K Vraga
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2017-06-16

4.  Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; April Oh; William M P Klein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Rumour research can douse digital wildfires.

Authors:  Nicholas DiFonzo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Individuals with greater science literacy and education have more polarized beliefs on controversial science topics.

Authors:  Caitlin Drummond; Baruch Fischhoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  When Do People Verify and Share Health Rumors on Social Media? The Effects of Message Importance, Health Anxiety, and Health Literacy.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Oh; Hyegyu Lee
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-10-14

8.  The role of parental motivation in family-based treatment for childhood obesity.

Authors:  Thrudur Gunnarsdottir; Urdur Njardvik; Anna S Olafsdottir; Linda W Craighead; Ragnar Bjarnason
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Assessing the application of latent class and latent profile analysis for evaluating the construct validity of complex posttraumatic stress disorder: cautions and limitations.

Authors:  Robin Achterhof; Rafaële J C Huntjens; Marie-Louise Meewisse; Henk A L Kiers
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions.

Authors:  Daniel Jolley; Karen M Douglas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The usefulness of a checklist approach-based confirmation scheme in identifying unreliable COVID-19-related health information: a case study in Japan.

Authors:  Nanae Tanemura; Tsuyoshi Chiba
Journal:  Humanit Soc Sci Commun       Date:  2022-08-15

2.  Effect of social media use on food safety risk perception through risk characteristics: Exploring a moderated mediation model among people with different levels of science literacy.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Hsi-Chen Wu; Liang Chen; Youzhen Su
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.