Literature DB >> 33667062

Bioactive Siloxane-Containing Shape-Memory Polymer (SMP) Scaffolds with Tunable Degradation Rates.

Felipe O Beltran1, Christopher J Houk2, Melissa A Grunlan1,2,3.   

Abstract

A material-guided, regenerative approach to heal cranial defects requires a scaffold that cannot only achieve conformal fit into irregular geometries but also has bioactivity and suitable resorption rates. We have previously reported "self-fitting" shape-memory polymer (SMP) scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone) diacrylate (PCL-DA) that shape recover to fill irregular defect geometries. However, PCL-DA scaffolds lack innate bioactivity and degrade very slowly. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been shown to impart innate bioactivity and modify degradation rates when combined with organic cross-linked networks. Thus, this work reports the introduction of PDMS segments to form PCL/PDMS SMP scaffolds. These were prepared as co-matrices with three types of macromers to systematically alter PDMS content and cross-link density. Specifically, PCL90-DA was combined with linear-PDMS66-dimethacrylate (DMA) or 4-armed star-PDMS66-tetramethacrylate (TMA) macromers at 90:10, 75:25, and 60:40 wt % ratios. Additionally, a triblock macromer (AcO-PCL45-b-PDMS66-b-PCL45-OAc), having a 65:35 wt % ratio PCL/PDMS, was used. Scaffolds exhibited pore interconnectivity and uniform pore sizes and further maintained excellent shape-memory behavior. Degradation rates increased with PDMS content and reduced cross-link density, with phase separation contributing to this effect. Irrespective of PDMS content, all PCL/PDMS scaffolds exhibited the formation of carbonated hydroxyapatite (HAp) following exposure to simulated body fluid (SBF). While inclusion of PDMS expectedly reduced scaffold modulus and strength, mineralization increased these properties and, in some cases, to values exceeding or similar to the PCL-DA, which did not mineralize.

Entities:  

Keywords:  poly(ε-caprolactone); polydimethylsiloxane; shape memory polymer; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33667062      PMCID: PMC8742657          DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng        ISSN: 2373-9878


  36 in total

1.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.

Authors:  D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; C Johansson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Bone substitutes in the Netherlands - a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Johan Van der Stok; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Youssef El-Massoudi; Gerdine H Van Kralingen; Peter Patka
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 4.  How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?

Authors:  Tadashi Kokubo; Hiroaki Takadama
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives.

Authors:  Livia Roseti; Valentina Parisi; Mauro Petretta; Carola Cavallo; Giovanna Desando; Isabella Bartolotti; Brunella Grigolo
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 7.328

6.  Incorporation of a silicon-based polymer to PEG-DA templated hydrogel scaffolds for bioactivity and osteoinductivity.

Authors:  Michael T Frassica; Sarah K Jones; Patricia Diaz-Rodriguez; Mariah S Hahn; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Hydrolytic degradation of PCL-PLLA semi-IPNs exhibiting rapid, tunable degradation.

Authors:  Lindsay N Woodard; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2018-11-28

8.  Biomedical applications of thermally activated shape memory polymers.

Authors:  Ward Small; Pooja Singhal; Thomas S Wilson; Duncan J Maitland
Journal:  J Mater Chem       Date:  2010-05-14

9.  Hydrogels in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Brandon V Slaughter; Shahana S Khurshid; Omar Z Fisher; Ali Khademhosseini; Nicholas A Peppas
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 10.  Craniofacial tissue engineering.

Authors:  E Alsberg; E E Hill; D J Mooney
Journal:  Crit Rev Oral Biol Med       Date:  2001
View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of a self-fitting, shape memory polymer scaffold in a rabbit calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Felipe O Beltran; Lindsay N Woodard; Lauren K Dobson; Shelby B Gasson; Andrew B Robbins; Zachary T Lawson; W Brian Saunders; Michael R Moreno; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 8.947

2.  Smart scaffolds: shape memory polymers (SMPs) in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Michaela R Pfau; Melissa A Grunlan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 7.571

3.  Methodology for performing biomechanical push-out tests for evaluating the osseointegration of calvarial defect repair in small animal models.

Authors:  Zachary T Lawson; Jiwan Han; W Brian Saunders; Melissa A Grunlan; Michael R Moreno; Andrew B Robbins
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-10-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.