Literature DB >> 33666671

[Minimally invasive implantation technique of a system for spinal cord stimulation].

Adnan Kasapovic1, Yorck Rommelspacher2, Sebastian Walter3, Martin Gathen3, Robert Pflugmacher3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) targets structures of the dorsal column and dorsal horn of the spinal cord with electrical impulses, thereby, modulating pain perception. For chronic pain patients, e.g., in failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), the aim is to achieve pain relief and enable patients to improve their quality of life. INDICATIONS: Failed back surgery syndrome, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type I and II, therapy-refractory ischemic pain, neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., phantom limb pain). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Identification of degenerative alterations as the cause of pain; untreated mental illness. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: A two-stage implantation technique is performed. Initially, after percutaneous implantation of epidural leads a trial period with stimulation by an external pulse generator is evaluated. Following verification of pain relief, a subcutaneous internal pulse generator is implanted. FOLLOW-UP: Early mobilization and adjustment of stimulation parameters.
RESULTS: In all, 19 consecutive patients with FBSS were treated by high frequency SCS (HF-SCS) and included in a prospective prognostic study. In 18 patients, an internal pulse generator (IPG) for HF-SCS was permanently implanted. Therapy success was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and painDetect questionnaire. Neuropathic pain of the legs versus the back (median values: VAS leg 71 mm, VAS back 69 mm) was dominant in the patients at a preoperative mean ODI of 63%. With HF-SCS therapy, a pronounced pain reduction was seen and persisted in the follow-up after 6 months (VAS leg 18 mm, VAS back 24 mm). The ODI showed an improvement to a mean of 24% after 6 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain syndrome; Complex regional pain syndrome; Failed back surgery syndrome; High frequency spinal cord stimulation; Spinal cord stimulation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33666671     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-021-00700-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  14 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  D M Dooley
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 0.676

2.  Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard B North; David H Kidd; Farrokh Farrokhi; Steven A Piantadosi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Can quantitative sensory tests predict failed back surgery?: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Monika Müller; Andreas Limacher; Christoph A Agten; Fabienne Treichel; Paul Heini; Ulrich Seidel; Ole K Andersen; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Peter Jüni; Michele Curatolo
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Failed back surgery syndrome - definition, epidemiology and demographics.

Authors:  Simon Thomson
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2013-02

5.  The economic impact of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Rod S Taylor; Rebecca J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2012-11

Review 6.  Burst and high frequency stimulation: underlying mechanism of action.

Authors:  Shaheen Ahmed; Thomas Yearwood; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 7.  Spinal cord stimulation: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  John C Oakley; Joshua P Prager
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Chin-wern Chan; Philip Peng
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.750

9.  Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Conventional Medical Management: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study of Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (PROCESS Study).

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Richard North; Rod Taylor; Mark Sculpher; Carine Van den Abeele; Marta Gehring; Line Jacques; Sam Eldabe; Mario Meglio; Joan Molet; Simon Thomson; Jim O'Callaghan; Elon Eisenberg; Germain Milbouw; Gianpaolo Fortini; Jonathan Richardson; Eric Buchser; Sherri Tracey; Pascale Reny; Morag Brookes; Salvatore Sabene; Paola Cano; Carol Banks; Louise Pengelly; Rivka Adler; Sophie Leruth; Claire Kelly; Myriam Jacobs
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2005-10

10.  The incidence and healthcare costs of persistent postoperative pain following lumbar spine surgery in the UK: a cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).

Authors:  Sharada Weir; Mihail Samnaliev; Tzu-Chun Kuo; Caitriona Ni Choitir; Travis S Tierney; David Cumming; Julie Bruce; Andrea Manca; Rod S Taylor; Sam Eldabe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.