Literature DB >> 31368907

Can quantitative sensory tests predict failed back surgery?: A prospective cohort study.

Monika Müller1, Andreas Limacher, Christoph A Agten, Fabienne Treichel, Paul Heini, Ulrich Seidel, Ole K Andersen, Lars Arendt-Nielsen, Peter Jüni, Michele Curatolo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a pain condition refractory to therapy, and is characterised by persistent low back pain after spinal surgery. FBSS is associated with severe disability, low quality of life and high unemployment. We are currently unable to identify patients who are at risk of developing FBSS. Patients with chronic low back pain may display signs of central hypersensitivity as assessed by quantitative sensory tests (QST). This can contribute to the risk of developing persistent pain after surgery.
OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that central hypersensitivity as assessed by QST predicts FBSS.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Three tertiary care centres. PATIENTS: 141 patients scheduled for up to three segment spinal surgery for chronic low back pain (defined as at least 3 on a numerical rating scale on most days during the week and with a minimum duration of 3 months) due to degenerative changes. OUTCOMES: We defined FBSS as persistent pain, persistent disability or a composite outcome defined as either persistent pain or disability. The primary outcome was persistent pain 12 months after surgery. We applied 14 QST using electrical, pressure and temperature stimulation to predict FBSS and assessed the association of QST with FBSS in multivariable analyses adjusted for sociodemographic, psychological and clinical and surgery-related characteristics.
RESULTS: None of the investigated 14 QST predicted FBSS, with 95% confidence intervals of crude and adjusted associations of all QST including one as a measure of no association. Results remained robust in all sensitivity and secondary analyses.
CONCLUSION: The study indicates that assessment of altered central pain processing using current QST is unlikely to identify patients at risk of FBSS and is therefore unlikely to inform clinical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31368907     DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  2 in total

1.  [Minimally invasive implantation technique of a system for spinal cord stimulation].

Authors:  Adnan Kasapovic; Yorck Rommelspacher; Sebastian Walter; Martin Gathen; Robert Pflugmacher
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  The Definition, Assessment, and Prevalence of (Human Assumed) Central Sensitisation in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ingrid Schuttert; Hans Timmerman; Kristian K Petersen; Megan E McPhee; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Michiel F Reneman; André P Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.