| Literature DB >> 33665133 |
Zaineb A F Albayati1, Narsimha R Penthala1, Shobanbabu Bommagani1, Ginell R Post2, Mark S Smeltzer3, Peter A Crooks1.
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that the bone targeting agent BT2-peg2 (BT2-minipeg2, 9), when conjugated to vancomycin and delivered systemically by intravenous (IV) or intraperitoneal (IP) injection accumulates in bone to a greater degree than vancomycin alone, but that this accumulation is associated with severe nephrotoxicity. To determine whether this nephrotoxicity could be attributed to BT2-peg2 itself, we used a rat model to assess the distribution and toxicity of BT2-peg2 after IP injection of 11 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days. The results demonstrated that BT2-peg2 accumulates in bone but there was no evidence of nephrotoxicity or any histopathological abnormalities in the bone. This suggests the nephrotoxicity observed in previous studies is likely due to the altered pharmacokinetics of vancomycin when conjugated to BT2-peg2 rather than to BT2-peg2 itself. Thus, BT2-peg2 may be a safe carrier for the enhanced delivery of antibiotics other than vancomycin to the bone as a means of combating bone infection. However, the data also emphasizes the need to carefully examine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of any BT2-peg2-antibiotic conjugate utilized for treatment of bone infections.Entities:
Keywords: BT2-peg2; Bone delivery; Bone pathology; Nephrotoxicity; Rat plasma
Year: 2021 PMID: 33665133 PMCID: PMC7898066 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Scheme 1Synthesis of BT2-peg2 conjugate (9).
Fig. 1Body weight change over the 21-day course of treatment with BT2-peg2 (11 mg/kg twice daily) in Albino Wistar male rats. No significant differences were noticed between treated and untreated rats. P > 0.05.
Fig. 2Representative kidneys from untreated and BT2-peg2-treated rats.
Kidney weights, BUN, plasma albumin, creatinine values, and plasma and bone BT2-peg2 levels after treatment with BT2-peg2 at a dose of 11 mg/kg (the molar equivalent of BT2-peg2 used in the BT2-peg2-vancomycin study [14]).
| Group | Untreated | BT2-peg2-treated |
|---|---|---|
| Kidney weight (g) | 2.5 ± 0.22 | 2.4 ± 0.35 |
| BUN (mg/dl) | 22.1 ± 2.5 | 23.0 ± 0.9 |
| Albumin (gm/dl) | 3.4 ± 0.02 | 3.5 ± 0.01 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.5 ± 0.01 | 0.6 ± 0.01 |
| Plasma (ng/mL) | – | < 1 |
| Bone (ng/g) | – | 235.0 ± 96.8 |
Fig. 3Histological analysis of kidneys as a function of BT2-peg2 treatment. Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stained histopathologic sections from untreated (left) and BT2-peg2-treated kidneys (right). There was no discernible evidence of microscopic glomerular or renal tubular damage as evidenced by tubular dilatation, apical budding, or brush border and tubular loss. The absence of demonstrable histopathology was also confirmed by H&E staining (data not shown).
Fig. 4Bone histology as a function of BT2-peg2 treatment. Representative images of H&E stained sections of the right tibia are shown from untreated (left) and BT2-peg2-treated rats.