Literature DB >> 33665041

Sensitivity analysis of the infection transmissibility in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Pardis Biglarbeigi1, Kok Yew Ng1, Dewar Finlay1, Raymond Bond1, Min Jing1, James McLaughlin1.   

Abstract

The coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak started in December 2019 and rapidly spread around the world affecting millions of people. With the growth of infection rate, many countries adopted different policies to control the spread of the disease. The UK implemented strict rules instructing individuals to stay at home except in some special circumstances starting from 23 March 2020. Accordingly, this study focuses on sensitivity analysis of transmissibility of the infection as the effects of removing restrictions, for example by returning different occupational groups to their normal working environment and its effect on the reproduction number in the UK. For this reason, available social contact matrices are adopted for the population of UK to account for the average number of contacts. Different scenarios are then considered to analyse the variability of total contacts on the reproduction number in the UK as a whole and each of its four nations. Our data-driven retrospective analysis shows that if more than 38.5% of UK working-age population return to their normal working environment, the reproduction number in the UK is expected to be higher than 1. However, analysis of each nation, separately, shows that local reproduction number in each nation may be different and requires more adequate analysis. Accordingly, we believe that using statistical methods and historical data can provide good estimation of local transmissibility and reproduction number in any region. As a consequence of this analysis, efforts to reduce the restrictions should be implemented locally via different control policies. It is important that these policies consider the social contacts, population density, and the occupational groups that are specific to each region.
© 2021 Biglarbeigi et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Coronavirus; Exit strategy; Pandemic; Reproduction number; Sensitivity analysis; Social contact matrix; Transmissibility

Year:  2021        PMID: 33665041      PMCID: PMC7916534          DOI: 10.7717/peerj.10992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PeerJ        ISSN: 2167-8359            Impact factor:   2.984


  36 in total

1.  On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  O Diekmann; J A Heesterbeek; J A Metz
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Effectiveness of isolation, testing, contact tracing, and physical distancing on reducing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different settings: a mathematical modelling study.

Authors:  Adam J Kucharski; Petra Klepac; Andrew J K Conlan; Stephen M Kissler; Maria L Tang; Hannah Fry; Julia R Gog; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  The pandemic virus is slowly mutating. But does it matter?

Authors:  Kai Kupferschmidt
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Contagion! The BBC Four Pandemic - The model behind the documentary.

Authors:  Petra Klepac; Stephen Kissler; Julia Gog
Journal:  Epidemics       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.396

5.  Reproduction numbers for epidemic models with households and other social structures. I. Definition and calculation of R0.

Authors:  Lorenzo Pellis; Frank Ball; Pieter Trapman
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment.

Authors:  Kathy Leung; Joseph T Wu; Di Liu; Gabriel M Leung
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.

Authors:  Robin N Thompson; T Déirdre Hollingsworth; Valerie Isham; Daniel Arribas-Bel; Ben Ashby; Tom Britton; Peter Challenor; Lauren H K Chappell; Hannah Clapham; Nik J Cunniffe; A Philip Dawid; Christl A Donnelly; Rosalind M Eggo; Sebastian Funk; Nigel Gilbert; Paul Glendinning; Julia R Gog; William S Hart; Hans Heesterbeek; Thomas House; Matt Keeling; István Z Kiss; Mirjam E Kretzschmar; Alun L Lloyd; Emma S McBryde; James M McCaw; Trevelyan J McKinley; Joel C Miller; Martina Morris; Philip D O'Neill; Kris V Parag; Carl A B Pearson; Lorenzo Pellis; Juliet R C Pulliam; Joshua V Ross; Gianpaolo Scalia Tomba; Bernard W Silverman; Claudio J Struchiner; Michael J Tildesley; Pieter Trapman; Cerian R Webb; Denis Mollison; Olivier Restif
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics.

Authors:  Anne Cori; Neil M Ferguson; Christophe Fraser; Simon Cauchemez
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Serial Interval of COVID-19 among Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases.

Authors:  Zhanwei Du; Xiaoke Xu; Ye Wu; Lin Wang; Benjamin J Cowling; Lauren Ancel Meyers
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Estimating the serial interval of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on the public surveillance data in Shenzhen, China, from 19 January to 22 February 2020.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Shi Zhao; Ying Liao; Tiantian Zhao; Xiaoyan Wang; Xueliang Zhang; Haiyan Jiao; Huling Li; Yi Yin; Maggie H Wang; Li Xiao; Lei Wang; Daihai He
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.521

View more
  2 in total

1.  COVID-19 modelling by time-varying transmission rate associated with mobility trend of driving via Apple Maps.

Authors:  Min Jing; Kok Yew Ng; Brian Mac Namee; Pardis Biglarbeigi; Rob Brisk; Raymond Bond; Dewar Finlay; James McLaughlin
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 8.000

Review 2.  Exit strategies from lockdowns due to COVID-19: a scoping review.

Authors:  Madhavi Misra; Harsha Joshi; Rakesh Sarwal; Krishna D Rao
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.