Literature DB >> 33664244

Real-time determination of earthquake focal mechanism via deep learning.

Wenhuan Kuang1, Congcong Yuan2, Jie Zhang3.   

Abstract

An immediate report of the source focal mechanism with full automation after a destructive earthquake is crucial for timely characterizing the faulting geometry, evaluating the stress perturbation, and assessing the aftershock patterns. Advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been introduced to solve various problems in real-time seismology, but the real-time source focal mechanism is still a challenge. Here we propose a novel deep learning method namely Focal Mechanism Network (FMNet) to address this problem. The FMNet trained with 787,320 synthetic samples successfully estimates the focal mechanisms of four 2019 Ridgecrest earthquakes with magnitude larger than Mw 5.4. The network learns the global waveform characteristics from theoretical data, thereby allowing the extensive applications of the proposed method to regions of potential seismic hazards with or without historical earthquake data. After receiving data, the network takes less than two hundred milliseconds for predicting the source focal mechanism reliably on a single CPU.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33664244     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21670-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  12 in total

1.  Triggering of earthquake aftershocks by dynamic stresses.

Authors:  D Kilb; J Gomberg; P Bodin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Earthquake triggering by seismic waves following the Landers and Hector Mine earthquakes.

Authors:  J Gomberg; P A Reasenberg; P Bodin; R A Harris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The potential for earthquake early warning in southern California.

Authors:  Richard M Allen; Hiroo Kanamori
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets.

Authors:  Geoffrey E Hinton; Simon Osindero; Yee-Whye Teh
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Three-dimensional splay fault geometry and implications for tsunami generation.

Authors:  G F Moore; N L Bangs; A Taira; S Kuramoto; E Pangborn; H J Tobin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Machine learning for data-driven discovery in solid Earth geoscience.

Authors:  Karianne J Bergen; Paul A Johnson; Maarten V de Hoop; Gregory C Beroza
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes.

Authors:  Phoebe M R DeVries; Fernanda Viégas; Martin Wattenberg; Brendan J Meade
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Hierarchical interlocked orthogonal faulting in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence.

Authors:  Zachary E Ross; Benjamín Idini; Zhe Jia; Oliver L Stephenson; Minyan Zhong; Xin Wang; Zhongwen Zhan; Mark Simons; Eric J Fielding; Sang-Ho Yun; Egill Hauksson; Angelyn W Moore; Zhen Liu; Jungkyo Jung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Machine learning reveals cyclic changes in seismic source spectra in Geysers geothermal field.

Authors:  Benjamin K Holtzman; Arthur Paté; John Paisley; Felix Waldhauser; Douglas Repetto
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location.

Authors:  Thibaut Perol; Michaël Gharbi; Marine Denolle
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deep compressed seismic learning for fast location and moment tensor inferences with natural and induced seismicity.

Authors:  Ismael Vera Rodriguez; Erik B Myklebust
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.