Literature DB >> 30158606

Deep learning of aftershock patterns following large earthquakes.

Phoebe M R DeVries1,2, Fernanda Viégas3, Martin Wattenberg3, Brendan J Meade4.   

Abstract

Aftershocks are a response to changes in stress generated by large earthquakes and represent the most common observations of the triggering of earthquakes. The maximum magnitude of aftershocks and their temporal decay are well described by empirical laws (such as Bath's law1 and Omori's law2), but explaining and forecasting the spatial distribution of aftershocks is more difficult. Coulomb failure stress change3 is perhaps the most widely used criterion to explain the spatial distributions of aftershocks4-8, but its applicability has been disputed9-11. Here we use a deep-learning approach to identify a static-stress-based criterion that forecasts aftershock locations without prior assumptions about fault orientation. We show that a neural network trained on more than 131,000 mainshock-aftershock pairs can predict the locations of aftershocks in an independent test dataset of more than 30,000 mainshock-aftershock pairs more accurately (area under curve of 0.849) than can classic Coulomb failure stress change (area under curve of 0.583). We find that the learned aftershock pattern is physically interpretable: the maximum change in shear stress, the von Mises yield criterion (a scaled version of the second invariant of the deviatoric stress-change tensor) and the sum of the absolute values of the independent components of the stress-change tensor each explain more than 98 per cent of the variance in the neural-network prediction. This machine-learning-driven insight provides improved forecasts of aftershock locations and identifies physical quantities that may control earthquake triggering during the most active part of the seismic cycle.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30158606     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0438-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  11 in total

1.  Machine Learning Applied to the Search for Nonlinear Features in Breeding Populations.

Authors:  Iulian Gabur; Danut Petru Simioniuc; Rod J Snowdon; Dan Cristea
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Xin Liu; Weiqiang Zhu; Liang Zhao; Gregory C Beroza
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 14.136

3.  Locating induced earthquakes with a network of seismic stations in Oklahoma via a deep learning method.

Authors:  Xiong Zhang; Jie Zhang; Congcong Yuan; Sen Liu; Zhibo Chen; Weiping Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Plant Disease Detection and Classification by Deep Learning.

Authors:  Muhammad Hammad Saleem; Johan Potgieter; Khalid Mahmood Arif
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  Real-time determination of earthquake focal mechanism via deep learning.

Authors:  Wenhuan Kuang; Congcong Yuan; Jie Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A Deep Learning-Based Electromagnetic Signal for Earthquake Magnitude Prediction.

Authors:  Zhenyu Bao; Jingyu Zhao; Pu Huang; Shanshan Yong; Xinan Wang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Understanding cytoskeletal avalanches using mechanical stability analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Floyd; Herbert Levine; Christopher Jarzynski; Garegin A Papoian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  FDNet: Knowledge and Data Fusion-Driven Deep Neural Network for Coal Burst Prediction.

Authors:  Anye Cao; Yaoqi Liu; Xu Yang; Sen Li; Yapeng Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Intelligent nanophotonics: merging photonics and artificial intelligence at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Kan Yao; Rohit Unni; Yuebing Zheng
Journal:  Nanophotonics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 8.449

Review 10.  The impact of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.

Authors:  Eileen L Mayro; Mengyu Wang; Tobias Elze; Louis R Pasquale
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.