Kai Sun1, Amy L Corneli2, Carrie Dombeck3, Teresa Swezey3, Jennifer L Rogers4, Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber3, Rebecca E Sadun3, Amanda M Eudy4, Jayanth Doss3, Hayden B Bosworth5, Megan E B Clowse4. 1. Duke University Hospital and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Duke University Medical Center and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 5. Duke University School of Medicine and Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Racial and ethnic minorities also have more severe SLE manifestations that require use of immunosuppressive medications, and often have lower rates of medication adherence. We aimed to explore barriers of adherence to SLE immunosuppressive medications among minority SLE patients. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of racial minority SLE patients taking oral immunosuppressants (methotrexate, azathioprine, or mycophenolate), and lupus clinic providers and staff. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. We grouped themes using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior conceptual model. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 SLE patients (4 adherent, 8 nonadherent) and 12 providers and staff. We identified capability barriers to include external factors related to acquiring medications, specifically cost-, pharmacy-, and clinic-related issues; opportunity barriers to include external barriers to taking medications, specifically logistic- and medication-related issues; and motivation factors to include intrinsic barriers, encompassing patients' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and physical and mental health. The most frequently described barriers were cost, side effects, busyness/forgetting, and lack of understanding, although barriers differed by patient and adherence level, with logistic and intrinsic barriers described predominantly by nonadherent patients and side effects described predominantly by adherent patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that interventions may be most impactful if they are designed to facilitate logistics of taking medications and increase patients' motivation while allowing for personalization to address the individual differences in adherence barriers.
OBJECTIVE: Underrepresented racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately affected by systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Racial and ethnic minorities also have more severe SLE manifestations that require use of immunosuppressive medications, and often have lower rates of medication adherence. We aimed to explore barriers of adherence to SLE immunosuppressive medications among minority SLE patients. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of racial minority SLE patients taking oral immunosuppressants (methotrexate, azathioprine, or mycophenolate), and lupus clinic providers and staff. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. We grouped themes using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior conceptual model. RESULTS: We interviewed 12 SLE patients (4 adherent, 8 nonadherent) and 12 providers and staff. We identified capability barriers to include external factors related to acquiring medications, specifically cost-, pharmacy-, and clinic-related issues; opportunity barriers to include external barriers to taking medications, specifically logistic- and medication-related issues; and motivation factors to include intrinsic barriers, encompassing patients' knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and physical and mental health. The most frequently described barriers were cost, side effects, busyness/forgetting, and lack of understanding, although barriers differed by patient and adherence level, with logistic and intrinsic barriers described predominantly by nonadherent patients and side effects described predominantly by adherent patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that interventions may be most impactful if they are designed to facilitate logistics of taking medications and increase patients' motivation while allowing for personalization to address the individual differences in adherence barriers.
Authors: Maria G Garcia Popa-Lisseanu; Anthony Greisinger; Marsha Richardson; Kimberly J O'Malley; Namieta M Janssen; Donald M Marcus; Jasmeet Tagore; Maria E Suarez-Almazor Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: G S Cooper; C G Parks; E L Treadwell; E W St Clair; G S Gilkeson; P L Cohen; R A S Roubey; M A Dooley Journal: Lupus Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.911
Authors: Carlton Haywood; Sophie Lanzkron; Shawn Bediako; John J Strouse; Jennifer Haythornthwaite; C Patrick Carroll; Marie Diener-West; Gladys Onojobi; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthieu Lavielle; Déborah Puyraimond-Zemmour; Xavier Romand; Laure Gossec; Eric Senbel; Sophie Pouplin; Catherine Beauvais; Loriane Gutermann; Maryse Mezieres; Maxime Dougados; Anna Molto Journal: RMD Open Date: 2018-07-27
Authors: Kai Sun; Amanda M Eudy; Jennifer L Rogers; Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber; Rebecca E Sadun; Jayanth Doss; Mithu Maheswaranathan; Ann Cameron Barr; Lena Eder; Amy L Corneli; Hayden B Bosworth; Megan E B Clowse Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 5.178
Authors: Martin Aringer; Marta E Alarcón-Riquelme; Megan Clowse; Guillermo J Pons-Estel; Edward M Vital; Maria Dall'Era Journal: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 5.346