Literature DB >> 33661124

Mobile Apps for Foot Measurement in Pedorthic Practice: Scoping Review.

Muhammad Ashad Kabir1, Sheikh Sowmen Rahman2, Mohammad Mainul Islam1,3, Sayed Ahmed4,5,6,7, Craig Laird6,7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As the use of smartphones increases globally across various fields of research and technology, significant contributions to the sectors related to health, specifically foot health, can be observed. Numerous smartphone apps are now being used for providing accurate information about various foot-related properties. Corresponding to this abundance of foot scanning and measuring apps available in app stores, there is a need for evaluating these apps, as limited information regarding their evidence-based quality is available.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess the measurement techniques and essential software quality characteristics of mobile foot measurement apps, and to determine their potential as commercial tools used by foot care health professionals, to assist in measuring feet for custom shoes, and for individuals to enhance their awareness of foot health and hygiene to ultimately prevent foot-related problems.
METHODS: An electronic search across Android and iOS app stores was performed between July and August 2020 to identify apps related to foot measurement and general foot health. The selected apps were rated by three independent raters, and all discrepancies were resolved by discussion among raters and other investigators. Based on previous work on app rating tools, a modified rating scale tool was devised to rate the selected apps. The internal consistency of the rating tool was tested with a group of three people who rated the selected apps over 2-3 weeks. This scale was then used to produce evaluation scores for the selected foot measurement apps and to assess the interrater reliability.
RESULTS: Evaluation inferences showed that all apps failed to meet even half of the measurement-specific criteria required for the proper manufacturing of custom-made footwear. Only 23% (6/26) of the apps reportedly used external scanners or advanced algorithms to reconstruct 3D models of a user's foot that could possibly be used for ordering custom-made footwear (shoes, insoles/orthoses), and medical casts to fit irregular foot sizes and shapes. The apps had varying levels of performance and usability, although the overall measurement functionality was subpar with a mean of 1.93 out of 5. Apps linked to online shops and stores (shoe recommendation) were assessed to be more usable than other apps but lacked some features (eg, custom shoe sizes and shapes). Overall, the current apps available for foot measurement do not follow any specific guidelines for measurement purposes.
CONCLUSIONS: Most commercial apps currently available in app stores are not viable for use as tools in assisting foot care health professionals or individuals to measure their feet for custom-made footwear. Current apps lack software quality characteristics and need significant improvements to facilitate proper measurement, enhance awareness of foot health, and induce motivation to prevent and cure foot-related problems. Guidelines similar to the essential criteria items introduced in this study need to be developed for future apps aimed at foot measurement for custom-made or individually fitted footwear and to create awareness of foot health. ©Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Sheikh Sowmen Rahman, Mohammad Mainul Islam, Sayed Ahmed, Craig Laird. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 04.03.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apps review; custom shoes making; diabetic foot; foot measurement; foot scanning; footcare; mobile app; pedorthics

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661124      PMCID: PMC7974751          DOI: 10.2196/24202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth        ISSN: 2291-5222            Impact factor:   4.773


  21 in total

1.  Foot measurement for shoe construction with reference to the relationship between foot length, foot breadth, and ball girth.

Authors:  K Baba
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1974-12

2.  Guidelines for the management of the foot health problems associated with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anita E Williams; Samantha Davies; Andrea Graham; Abbie Dagg; Kerry Longrigg; Caroline Lyons; Catherine Bowen
Journal:  Musculoskeletal Care       Date:  2011-06

Review 3.  Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Schoeppe; Stephanie Alley; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Nicola A Bray; Susan L Williams; Mitch J Duncan; Corneel Vandelanotte
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.457

4.  Efficacy of Mobile Apps to Support the Care of Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Bráulio Cezar Bonoto; Vânia Eloisa de Araújo; Isabella Piassi Godói; Lívia Lovato Pires de Lemos; Brian Godman; Marion Bennie; Leonardo Mauricio Diniz; Augusto Afonso Guerra Junior
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps.

Authors:  Fiona H McKay; Annemarie Wright; Jane Shill; Hugh Stephens; Mary Uccellini
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Smartphone Apps Targeting Alcohol and Illicit Substance Use: Systematic Search in in Commercial App Stores and Critical Content Analysis.

Authors:  Babak Tofighi; Chemi Chemi; Jose Ruiz-Valcarcel; Paul Hein; Lu Hu
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 7.  The Effectiveness of Self-Management Mobile Phone and Tablet Apps in Long-term Condition Management: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lisa Whitehead; Philippa Seaton
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Development and Validation of the User Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).

Authors:  Stoyan R Stoyanov; Leanne Hides; David J Kavanagh; Hollie Wilson
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Evaluation of foot health related quality of life in individuals with foot problems by gender: a cross-sectional comparative analysis study.

Authors:  Daniel López-López; Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo; Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias; Patricia Palomo-López; David Rodríguez-Sanz; Juan Manuel Brandariz-Pereira; César Calvo-Lobo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Mobile Apps for Health Behavior Change in Physical Activity, Diet, Drug and Alcohol Use, and Mental Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madison Milne-Ives; Ching Lam; Caroline De Cock; Michelle Helena Van Velthoven; Edward Meinert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.773

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experimental Analysis of Commercial Optical Methods for Foot Measurement.

Authors:  Matthias C Jäger; Jörg Eberhardt; Douglas W Cunningham
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.