Literature DB >> 33660777

Anti-CRISPR AcrIF9 functions by inducing the CRISPR-Cas complex to bind DNA non-specifically.

Wang-Ting Lu1, Chantel N Trost2, Hanna Müller-Esparza3, Lennart Randau3,4, Alan R Davidson1,2.   

Abstract

Phages and other mobile genetic elements express anti-CRISPR proteins (Acrs) to protect their genomes from destruction by CRISPR-Cas systems. Acrs usually block the ability of CRISPR-Cas systems to bind or cleave their nucleic acid substrates. Here, we investigate an unusual Acr, AcrIF9, that induces a gain-of-function to a type I-F CRISPR-Cas (Csy) complex, causing it to bind strongly to DNA that lacks both a PAM sequence and sequence complementarity. We show that specific and non-specific dsDNA compete for the same site on the Csy:AcrIF9 complex with rapid exchange, but specific ssDNA appears to still bind through complementarity to the CRISPR RNA. Induction of non-specific DNA-binding is a shared property of diverse AcrIF9 homologues. Substitution of a conserved positively charged surface on AcrIF9 abrogated non-specific dsDNA-binding of the Csy:AcrIF9 complex, but specific dsDNA binding was maintained. AcrIF9 mutants with impaired non-specific dsDNA binding activity in vitro displayed a reduced ability to inhibit CRISPR-Cas activity in vivo. We conclude that misdirecting the CRISPR-Cas complex to bind non-specific DNA is a key component of the inhibitory mechanism of AcrIF9. This inhibitory mechanism is distinct from a previously characterized anti-CRISPR, AcrIF1, that sterically blocks DNA-binding, even though AcrIF1and AcrIF9 bind to the same site on the Csy complex.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33660777     DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  7 in total

Review 1.  Structure-based functional mechanisms and biotechnology applications of anti-CRISPR proteins.

Authors:  Ning Jia; Dinshaw J Patel
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Alternative functions of CRISPR-Cas systems in the evolutionary arms race.

Authors:  Prarthana Mohanraju; Chinmoy Saha; Peter van Baarlen; Rogier Louwen; Raymond H J Staals; John van der Oost
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Structural basis of AcrIF24 as an anti-CRISPR protein and transcriptional suppressor.

Authors:  Indranil Arun Mukherjee; Clinton Gabel; Nicholas Noinaj; Joseph Bondy-Denomy; Leifu Chang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 16.174

Review 4.  Structural insights into the inactivation of the type I-F CRISPR-Cas system by anti-CRISPR proteins.

Authors:  Lingguang Yang; Yi Zhang; Peipei Yin; Yue Feng
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.766

5.  Insights into the dual functions of AcrIF14 during the inhibition of type I-F CRISPR-Cas surveillance complex.

Authors:  Xi Liu; Laixing Zhang; Yu Xiu; Teng Gao; Ling Huang; Yongchao Xie; Lingguang Yang; Wenhe Wang; Peiyi Wang; Yi Zhang; Maojun Yang; Yue Feng
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Insights into the inhibition of type I-F CRISPR-Cas system by a multifunctional anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF24.

Authors:  Lingguang Yang; Laixing Zhang; Peipei Yin; Hao Ding; Yu Xiao; Jianwei Zeng; Wenhe Wang; Huan Zhou; Qisheng Wang; Yi Zhang; Zeliang Chen; Maojun Yang; Yue Feng
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Disarming of type I-F CRISPR-Cas surveillance complex by anti-CRISPR proteins AcrIF6 and AcrIF9.

Authors:  Egle Kupcinskaite; Marijonas Tutkus; Aurimas Kopūstas; Simonas Ašmontas; Marija Jankunec; Mindaugas Zaremba; Giedre Tamulaitiene; Tomas Sinkunas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.996

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.