Literature DB >> 25254609

Clinical relevance of routine semen analysis and controversies surrounding the 2010 World Health Organization criteria for semen examination.

Sandro C Esteves1.   

Abstract

Semen analysis is the corner stone of infertility evaluation as it provides information on the functional status of the seminiferous tubules, epididymis and accessory sex glands. The methods on how the human semen should be evaluated are provided by the World Health Organization, which periodically releases manuals that include specific protocols and reference standards. In 2010, the WHO published new criteria for human semen characteristics that were markedly lower than those previously reported. In this review initially it is discussed the limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate measure of a man's ability to father a pregnancy. Secondly, it is analyzed methodology issues that could explain why the newly released reference values were different from those earlier reported. Thirdly, it is speculated on the likely effects of the 2010 WHO criteria in the management of male infertility. Due to the several inherent limitations of semen analysis as a surrogate marker of male infertility, physicians should exercise caution when interpreting results. A template for semen analysis reports that incorporates the distribution of the semen characteristics of recent fathers in centiles rather than solely the minimum thresholds could aid clinicians to better understand how a given patient results compare with the reference population. Importantly, a male infertility evaluation must go far beyond a simple semen analysis, as it has to be complemented with a proper physical examination, a comprehensive history taking, and relevant endocrine, genetic, and other investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25254609     DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.04.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  54 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of recent clinical practice guidelines and best practice statements for the evaluation of the infertile male.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Peter Chan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Effect of varicocele repair on sperm DNA fragmentation: a review.

Authors:  Matheus Roque; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Oxidation-reduction potential of semen: what is its role in the treatment of male infertility?

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Kimberly B Bjugstad; Chak-Lam Cho
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-06-28

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of sperm DNA degradation index (DDSi) as a potential noninvasive biomarker to identify men with varicocele-associated infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Jaime Gosálvez; Carmen López-Fernández; Rocío Núñez-Calonge; Pedro Caballero; Ashok Agarwal; José Luis Fernández
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Novel concepts in male factor infertility: clinical and laboratory perspectives.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Sperm DNA fragmentation on the day of fertilization is not associated with embryologic or clinical outcomes after IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Katherine A Green; George Patounakis; Michael P Dougherty; Marie D Werner; Richard T Scott; Jason M Franasiak
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  Sperm DNA fragmentation testing: Summary evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Armand Zini; Robert Matthew Coward; Donald P Evenson; Jaime Gosálvez; Sheena E M Lewis; Rakesh Sharma; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.775

8.  Sperm lipidic profiles differ significantly between ejaculates resulting in pregnancy or not following intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  Rocio Rivera-Egea; Nicolas Garrido; Nerea Sota; Marcos Meseguer; Jose Remohí; Francisco Dominguez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Sperm selection during ICSI treatments reduces single- but not double-strand DNA break values compared to the semen sample.

Authors:  Sandra Lara-Cerrillo; Jordi Ribas-Maynou; Candela Rosado-Iglesias; Tania Lacruz-Ruiz; Jordi Benet; Agustín García-Peiró
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Time has come to provide infertile men with an optimal fertility pathway.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.