| Literature DB >> 33659064 |
A Marege1, M Seid1, B Boke1, S Thomas1, M Arage1, N Mouze1, T Yohanes1, M Woldemariam1, A Manilal1.
Abstract
Concurrent infection with Schistosoma mansoni and Salmonella species is not uncommon in the endemic area of sub-Saharan Africa, although its prevalence may have regional variations. We discuss such coinfection and associated factors in an Ethiopian context. We assessed the prevalence of S. mansoni and Salmonella coinfections among patients attending two hospitals in southern Ethiopia. A facility-based cross-sectional study was carried out between 1 October and 30 November 2019. In total 271 participants with gastrointestinal complaints were selected through a systematic sampling technique. S. mansoni was detected using direct microscopy and formalin-ether concentration techniques, whereas Salmonella was identified by conventional culture methods and the Widal test. Antibiotic susceptibility test for Salmonella isolates was performed. The prevalence rates of S. mansoni and Salmonella infections were 17.30% and 7.70% respectively. The prevalence of S. mansoni-Salmonella coinfection was 7.7%. Of the factors analysed in connection with coinfection, male sex, age and frequency of exposure to contaminated water bodies were found to be statistically significant. S. mansoni-Salmonella coinfections pose a grave health problem in the study area, especially among children. Our conclusions can be used by the medical community to frame and implement intervention strategies for the management of S. mansoni-Salmonella coinfections.Entities:
Keywords: Coinfection; Ethiopia; Salmonella spp.; Schistosoma mansoni; jinka; salmonellosis; schistosomiasis
Year: 2021 PMID: 33659064 PMCID: PMC7895834 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100842
Source DB: PubMed Journal: New Microbes New Infect ISSN: 2052-2975
Schistosoma mansoni–Salmonella coinfection: sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants, October–November 2019 (n = 271)
| Characteristic | Total samples | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | p | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p | |||||
| Gender | ||||||||
| Male | 165 | 38 (23.30) | 0.014 | 17 (10.30) | 0.60 | 17 (10.30) | 2.51 (1.109–4.62) | 0.010 |
| Female | 106 | 9 (8.49) | Ref | 4 (3.70) | Ref | 4 (3.77) | Ref | |
| Age category | ||||||||
| 5–15 years | 102 | 31 (65.90) | 0.037 | 9 (8.80) | 0.27 | 9 (8.82) | 3.19 (1.10–9.20) | 0.008 |
| 16–30 years | 93 | 11 (23.40) | 0.27 | 9 (9.60) | 0.89 | 9 (9.67) | 2.03 (0.62–6.65) | NS |
| 31–45 years | 70 | 5 (10.60) | 0.29 | 3 (4.20) | 0.29 | 3 (4.28) | 1.23 (0.27–5.59) | NS |
| >46 years | 6 | 0 | Ref | 0 | Ref | 0 | Ref | |
| Place of residence | ||||||||
| Rural | 141 | 44 (31.20) | 0.75 | 13 (9) | 0.77 | 13 (28.88) | Ref | 0.177 |
| Urban | 130 | 3 (2.30) | Ref | 8 (6.10) | Ref | 8 (6.15) | 2.40 (0.84–6.81) | |
| Occupational status | ||||||||
| Employed | 7 | 0 | 0.29 | 0 | Ref | 0 | Ref | |
| Housekeeper | 55 | 2 (3.63) | Ref | 4 (7.20) | 0.776 | 4 (7.27) | 3.42 (1.12–10.43) | NS |
| Merchant | 68 | 1 (1.47) | 0.75 | 3 (8.60) | 0.37 | 3 (8.68) | 6.23 (0.57–67.12) | NS |
| Student | 76 | 39 (51.31) | 0.14 | 12 (15.70) | 0.64 | 12 (15.78) | 1.8 (0.40–6.90) | NS |
| Other | 65 | 5 (7.69) | 0.37 | 2 (3.07) | 0.77 | 2 (3.07) | NS | |
| Educational status | ||||||||
| Illiterate | 92 | 13 (14.13) | 0.08 | 8 (8.80) | 0.86 | 7 (7.6) | 0.25 (0.01–3.54) | NS |
| Can read and write | 136 | 28 (20.50) | 0.24 | 34 (65.30) | 0.53 | 11 (8.08) | 3.40 (0.59–19.50) | NS |
| Grade (1–10) | 37 | 6 (16.21) | 0.54 | 5 (11.60) | Ref | 3 (22.50) | Ref | NS |
| Tertiary-level education | 6 | 0 | Ref | 8 (8.80) | 0.86 | 0 | 0.717 (.12, 3.99) | NS |
| Habit and frequency of contact with water body | ||||||||
| Frequently | 57 | 34 (59.64) | 0.02 | 8 (8.80) | 0.86 | 13 (9) | 2.78 (0.81–9.68) | 0.001 |
| Seldom | 145 | 13 (8.96) | 0.72 | 34 (65.30) | 0.53 | 8 (5.50) | 0.25 (0.019–3.49) | NS |
| Not at all | 69 | 0 | Ref | 5 (11.60) | Ref | 0 | Ref | |
| Drinking water source | ||||||||
| Bono water | 86 | 0 | Ref | 0 | Ref | 0 | Ref | |
| Standpipe | 90 | 8 (8.80) | 0.64 | 5 (5.50) | 0.77 | 5 (5.50) | 3.54 (1.09–11.5) | NS |
| River water | 52 | 34 (65.38) | 0.58 | 13 (25) | 0.68 | 13 (25) | 0.04 (0.008–1.2) | NS |
| Well | 43 | 5 (11.62) | 0.81 | 3 (6.97) | 0.62 | 3 (6.97) | 2.69 (2.31–183.1) | NS |
| Latrine present | 42 | 38 (90.4) | 0.74 | 19 (90.40) | 0.66 | 19 (90.47) | 0.016 (0.001–0.8) | NS |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; NS, not significant. Reference, p ≤ 0.05.
Fig. 1Distribution of Schistosoma mansoni, Salmonella and their coinfection in relation to health institutions. Out of 47 intestinal schistosomiasis patients, 37 (78.70%) were from Jinka General Hospital and ten (21.30%) were from Jinka Millennium Health Center. Results demonstrated that of 21 Salmonella-positive patients, 15 (71.40%) were from Jinka General Hospital and six (28.57%) were from Jinka Millennium Health Center. Number of coinfected patients was 15 from Jinka General Hospital and 6 from Jinka Millennium Health Center.
Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of six Salmonella isolates
| Antimicrobial agent | Resistant | Intermediate | Susceptible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ampicillin | 6 (100) | 0 | 0 |
| Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | 0 | 0 | 6 (100) |
| Ceftriaxone | 2 (33) | 1 (16) | 3 (50) |
| Cefotaxime | 0 | 0 | 6 (100) |
| Gentamicin | 1 (16) | 2 (33) | 3 (50) |
| Amikacin | 0 | 0 | 6 (100) |
| Tetracycline | 4 (66) | 1 (16) | 1 (16) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 3 (50) | 1 (16) | 2 (33) |
| Chloramphenicol | 2 (33) | 2 (33) | 2 (33) |
| Nalidixic acid | 2 (33) | 1 (16) | 3 (50) |
| Cotrimoxazole | 4 (66) | 0 | 2 (33) |
Data are presented as n (%).
| Conceptualization | Mohammed Seid, tsegaye yohanes and melat woldemariam |
|---|---|
| Methodology | Alebachew Marege, Bereket Boke, Samson Thomas, Muhammed Arage, Nebyt Mouze |
| Software | Mohammed Seid, Alebachew Marege |
| Validation | Mohammed Seid, Aseer Manilal |
| Formal analysis | Mohammed Seid, Alebachew Marege, Aseer Manilal |
| Investigation | Alebachew Marege, Bereket Boke, Samson Thomas, Muhammed Arage, Nebyt Mouze |
| Resources | Alebachew Marege, Bereket Boke, Samson Thomas, Muhammed Arage, Nebyt Mouze |
| Data Curation | Mohammed Seid, Alebachew Marege |
| Writing - Original Draft | Aseer Manilal, Mohammed Seid |
| Writing - Review & Editing | Aseer Manilal, Mohammed Seid |
| Visualization | Mohammed Seid, Aseer Manilal |
| Supervision | Mohammed Seid, Tsegaye Yohanes and Melat Woldemariam |
| Project administration | Mohammed Seid, Alebachew Marege |