Literature DB >> 33658807

Clinical Impact and Risk Factors of Nonsusceptibility to Third-Generation Cephalosporins Among Hospitalized Adults with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia in Southern Taiwan: A Multicenter Study.

Tsao-Chin Lin1,2, Yuan-Pin Hung3,4, Ching-Chi Lee5, Wei-Tang Lin6, Li-Chen Huang6, Wei Dai7, Chi-Shuang Kuo8, Wen-Chien Ko4,9, Yeou-Lih Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing the effectiveness of broad-spectrum cephalosporins against Enterobacteriaceae infections has been recognized. This study aimed to investigate risk factors and clinical significance of third-generation cephalosporin nonsusceptibility (3GC-NS) among the cases of monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (mEB) at regional or district hospitals.
METHODS: The study was conducted at three hospitals in southern Taiwan between Jan. 2017 and Oct. 2019. Only the first episode of mEB from each adult (aged ≥20 years) was included. The primary outcome was in-hospital crude mortality.
RESULTS: Overall there were 499 episodes of adults with mEB included, and their mean age was 74.5 years. Female predominated, accounting for 53% of all patients. Escherichia coli (62%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (21%) were two major causative species. The overall mortality rate was 15% (73/499), and patients infected by 3GC-NS isolates (34%, 172/499) had a higher mortality rate than those by 3GC-susceptible isolates (66%, 327/499) (21% vs 11%, P=0.005). By the multivariate analysis, 3GC-NS was the only independent prognostic determinant (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.78; P=0.04). Of note, male (AOR 2.02, P=0.001), nosocomial-acquired bacteremia (AOR 2.77, P<0.001), and usage of nasogastric tube (AOR 2.01, P=0.002) were positively associated with 3GC-NS, but P. mirabilis bacteremia (AOR 0.28, P=0.01) and age (AOR 0.98, P=0.04) negatively with 3GC-NS.
CONCLUSION: For adults with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia, 3GC-NS signifies a significant prognostic impact. Efforts to rapid identification of such antimicrobial resistance profiles should be incorporated into antimicrobial stewardship programs to achieve favorable outcomes.
© 2021 Lin et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacteriaceae; Klebsiella pneumoniae; male; nasogastric tube; nonsusceptible; third-generation cephalosporin

Year:  2021        PMID: 33658807      PMCID: PMC7918563          DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S297978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Drug Resist        ISSN: 1178-6973            Impact factor:   4.003


Introduction

Enterobacteriaceae isolates are responsible for a wide variety of nosocomial and community-acquired infections and third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) are administered as the main choice for the treatment of infections caused by these microorganisms.1–7 However, along with the over-prescription of 3GCs by clinicians, reducing the therapeutic efficacy of these antimicrobial agents for Enterobacteriaceae infections1,7–11 and the increasing trend in nonsusceptibility (NS) to 3GCs were recently evidenced.12 Moreover, infections caused by 3GC-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were significantly associated with the increasing hazard of death and excess length of stay and costs.13 Taking Escherichia coli as an example, the total cost attributable to excess hospital stays for bloodstream infections caused by 3GC-resistant isolates was estimated up to 18.1 million Euros each year in Europe.14 Furthermore, for patients with Enterobacter bacteremia, the 30-day mortality rate of patients infected by 3GC-resistant isolates was significantly higher than those by 3GC-susceptible isolates, regardless of whether stratified by infection sites or by the initial presence of septic shock.15 In a medical center in northern Taiwan, the overall proportion of 3GC resistance in community-onset E. coli bacteremia has been up to 19.7%.16 Nevertheless, the clinical impact of 3GC resistance on the prognoses of patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia in the district or regional hospitals in Taiwan was not reported yet. Accordingly, the aim of the present multicenter study was to investigate risk factors of 3GC-NS Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia and their adverse influence on outcomes.

Methods

Study Design and Population

The study was conducted at three hospitals of the Ministry of Health and Welfare in southern Taiwan: Tainan Hospital (A, a 300-bed district hospital), Sinying Hospital (B, a 78-bed regional hospital), and Chiayi Hospital (C, a 237-bed regional hospital). There were infection-disease specialists dealing with antibiotic stewardship program at the study hospitals. The study periods spanned between Jan. 1, 2017 and Oct. 31, 2019. The episodes of monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (mEB) in hospitalized adults (aged ≥ 20 years) were analyzed, and only the first episode in each patient was included during the study period. The study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (A-ER-105-183).

Data Collection

By reviewing the electronic medical charts, a predetermined form was adapted to collect clinical characters, in terms of patient gender, age, hospitalization duration, usage of vasopressor agents and antimicrobials, types and severity (Charlson comorbidity index) of comorbidities, laboratory data, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the in-hospital crude mortality after bacteremia onset. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete clinical information.

Microbiological Methods

Blood cultures were processed in the BD BACTEC 9240 system (Becton Dickinson, USA). Bacterial species were identified by the morphology and color in the chromogenic agar, and confirmed by BD GNB ID or BD E/NF crystal kit (Becton Dickinson, USA). Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by the disk diffusion method, in accordance with the procedures of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), and was interpreted according to the zone criteria of CLSI issued in 2018 (M100-S21).17 The drugs tested included ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, gentamicin, amikacin, cefazolin, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, ertapenem, and imipenem or meropenem. Susceptibility to 3GCs was defined as the clear zone diameter of ceftriaxone ≥23 mm, cefotaxime ≥26 mm, or ceftazidime ≥21 mm,17 and susceptibility to fluoroquinolones as the clear zone diameter of levofloxacin ≥17 mm or ciprofloxacin ≥21 mm.17

Definitions

Bacteremia was defined as bacterial growth of blood cultures drawn from central or peripheral venipuncture. As previously described,18,19 the administration of antimicrobial therapy was considered to be appropriate when all the following criteria were fulfilled: (i) the administrated antimicrobial was in vitro active against causative microorganisms isolated from blood cultures, based on the contemporary CLSI breakpoints.17 (ii) the route and dosage of antimicrobials were administered as recommended in accordance with the Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy 2018.20 As per the previous definition,21 antimicrobials administered within 3 days after bacteremia onset were regarded as empirical therapy, and those administered after 3 days of onset when the identification and susceptibility data of bacteremic isolates were available were referred to as definitive therapy. Nosocomial bacteremia was defined as the onset of bacteremia occurring at ≥48 hours after admission.22 Septic shock was defined as a mean arterial pressure of <75 mmHg and usage of vasopressor administration.23 Comorbidities were defined as described previously.24 Malignancies included hematological malignancies and solid tumors. The severity of preexisting medical diseases was assessed by a previously delineated classification system (Charlson comorbidity index).25 Crude mortality was defined as death from all causes.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed by the statistical software (SPSS, version 13.0). Descriptive statistics, including the means, standard deviations, and ranges, were used to analyze the continuous variables. For categorical variables, the percentages and confidence intervals were used. The independent-t-test was applied for the continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for the categorical variables. To identify the predictors and impact of 3GC NS, the variables with a P value less than 0.1 recognized by the univariate analysis were processed by a stepwise, backward logistic regression model. A two-tailed P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patient Demographics

After excluding recurrent episodes and polymicrobial bacteremia, there were 293, 88, and 118 episodes of mEB in the hospital A, B and C, respectively, were included for the analysis (Figure 1). The crude in-hospital mortality rate was similar in three hospitals: 15%, 16%, and 13%, respectively. Overall, this study involved 499 adults with an average age of 75 years and their crude in-hospital mortality rate was 15%. Female gender (263, 53%) predominated. Common comorbidities of the included patients included hypertension, diabetes mellitus, old stroke, chronic kidney diseases, and malignancy, and in this study major microorganisms causing mEB were E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Providencia stuartii, and Citrobacter koseri (Table 1).
Figure 1

A flowchart of patient selection in three study hospitals.

Table 1

Factors Associated with In-Hospital Crude Mortality in Patients with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

VariablesTotalPatient Numbers (%)P value
n=499Survived, n=426Expired, n=73
Age, years, mean ± SD74.5 ± 12.974.1 ± 13.077.3 ± 11.50.05
Gender, male236 (47.3)201 (47.2)35 (47.9)1.00
Comorbidities
 Hypertension286 (57.3)246 (57.7)40 (54.8)0.70
 Diabetes mellitus207 (41.5)177 (41.5)30 (41.1)1.00
 Old stroke105 (21.0)86 (20.2)19 (26.0)0.28
 Chronic kidney diseases79 (15.8)64 (15.0)15 (20.5)0.23
 Malignancy66 (13.2)54 (12.7)12 (16.4)0.36
 Coronary artery disease history58 (11.6)48 (11.3)10 (13.7)0.55
 Liver cirrhosis22 (4.4)18 (4.2)4 (5.5)0.55
 Congestive heart failure14 (2.8)13 (3.1)1 (1.4)0.70
Charlson comorbidity index, mean ± SD1.2±1.21.2± 1.11.4± 1.30.15
Nosocomial bacteremia112 (22.4)91 (21.4)21 (28.8)0.17
Time-to-positivity, hours25.1± 17.424.5± 17.428.5± 19.40.10
Antimicrobial-susceptible isolates
 Second GCs223 (44.7)197 (46.2)26 (35.6)0.10
Third GCs327 (65.5)290 (68.1)37 (50.7)0.005
 Fourth GCs363 (72.7)316 (74.2)47 (64.4)0.09
 Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid297 (57.5)250 (58.7)37 (50.7)0.20
 Fluoroquinolones259 (51.9)224 (52.6)35 (47.9)0.53
Ertapenem465 (93.2)403 (94.6)62 (84.9)0.009
Major causative microorganisms
Escherichia coli310 (62.1)275 (64.6)35 (47.9)0.009
Klebsiella pneumoniae104 (20.8)80 (18.8)24 (32.9)0.008
Proteus mirabilis31 (6.2)27 (6.3)4 (5.5)1.00
Providencia stuartii11 (2.2)10 (2.3)1 (1.4)1.00
Citrobacter koseri8 (1.6)7 (1.6)1 (1.4)1.00

Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Abbreviations: GC, generation cephalosporin; SD, standard deviation.

Factors Associated with In-Hospital Crude Mortality in Patients with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05. Abbreviations: GC, generation cephalosporin; SD, standard deviation. A flowchart of patient selection in three study hospitals.

Risk Factors of In-Hospital Crude Mortality

As compared with the survivors, fatal patients with mEB were less likely to be infected by 3GC- (68% vs 51%, P=0.005) or ertapenem-susceptible isolates (95% vs 85%, P=0.009) and E. coli (65% vs 48%, P=0.008) (Table 1), but were often associated with K. pneumoniae infections (19% vs 33%, P=0.008). No significant association between the in-hospital mortality and patient age, gender male, comorbidity types or Charlson comorbidity index was disclosed. Notably, in the multivariate analysis for risk factors of in-hospital crude mortality, only one independent variable, 3GC-NS, was recognized (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.78; 95% confident interval [CI] 1.02–3.11; P=0.04) (Table 2).
Table 2

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for In-Hospital Crude Mortality Among Adults with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

CharactersAdjusted Odds Ratio95% Confidence IntervalP value
3GC nonsusceptibility1.781.02–3.110.04
Ertapenem nonsusceptibility1.550.61–3.910.36
Klebsiella pneumoniae1.120.51–2.490.78
Escherichia coli0.600.31–1.190.14

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Abbreviation: 3GC, third-generation cephalosporin.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors for In-Hospital Crude Mortality Among Adults with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05. Abbreviation: 3GC, third-generation cephalosporin.

Predictors of 3GC-Nonsusceptibility Among Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

Patients infected by 3GC-NS isolates were older (mean age: 77 years vs 74 years; P=0.009) and more likely to be male gender (58% vs 42%, P<0.001), or to have comorbidities of chronic kidney diseases (23% vs 12%, P=0.003) or the use of nasogastric tubes (61% vs 37%, P<0.001) or urinary catheters (55% vs 38%, P<0.001) than those by 3GC-susceptible microorganisms, as shown in Table 3. Otherwise, less episodes of P. mirabilis bacteremia (3% vs 8%, P=0.03) and more K. pneumonia bacteremia (30% vs 16%, P<0.001) were noted in patients with 3GC-NS Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia (Table 3). Since chronic kidney disease was the only parameter in Charlson comorbidity index with statistically correlated with 3GC-NS, chronic kidney disease, instead of Charlson comorbidity index, was placed in the multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, male patients (AOR 2.02, 95% CI 1.33–3.05; P=0.001), nosocomial-acquired bacteremia (AOR 2.77, 95% CI 1.72–4.47; P<0.001), and usage of nasogastric tube (AOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.28–3.16; P=0.002) were positively associated with 3GC-NS (Table 4). In contrast, P. mirabilis bacteremic episodes (AOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.10–0.77; P=0.01) and age (AOR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.99; P=0.04) were negatively linked to 3GC-NS.
Table 3

Clinical Predictors of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Nonsusceptibility in the Episodes of Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

VariablesPatient Numbers (%)P value
Susceptible, n=327Nonsusceptible, n=172
Age, years, mean ± SD73.5 ± 13.076.6 ± 12.30.009
Charlson comorbidity index, mean ± SD1.1 ± 1.11.4 ± 1.20.007
Gender, male137 (41.9)99 (57.6)<0.001
Comorbidities
 Hypertension190 (58.1)96 (55.8)0.64
 Diabetes mellitus133 (40.7)74 (43.0)0.63
 Old stroke68 (20.8)37 (21.5)0.91
Chronic kidney disease40 (12.2)39 (22.7)0.003
 Malignancy43 (13.1)23 (13.4)1.00
 Coronary artery disease32 (9.8)26 (15.1)0.08
 Liver cirrhosis12 (3.7)10 (5.8)0.26
 Congestive heart failure8 (2.4)6 (3.5)0.57
Nosocomial bacteremia48 (14.7)64 (37.2)<0.001
Catheter dependence
Nasogastric tube120 (36.9)104 (60.8)<0.001
Urinary catheter124 (37.9)94 (55.3)<0.001
Major causative microorganisms
Escherichia coli210 (64.2)100 (58.1)0.21
Klebsiella pneumoniae51 (15.6)52 (30.2)<0.001
Proteus mirabilis26 (7.9)5 (2.9)0.03
Providencia stuartii10 (3.1)1 (0.6)0.11
Citrobacter koseri6 (1.8)2 (1.2)0.72

Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Table 4

Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Nonsusceptibility Among the Episodes of Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia

CharactersAdjusted Odds Ratio95% Confidence IntervalP value
Patient demographics
Male2.021.33–3.050.001
Age, years0.980.97–0.990.04
Nosocomial bacteremia2.771.72–4.47<0.001
Catheter dependence
Nasogastric tubes2.011.28–3.160.002
 Urinary catheters1.390.89–2.180.15
Causative microorganisms
Klebsiella pneumoniae1.480.90–2.450.13
Proteus mirabilis0.280.10–0.770.01
Underlying chronic kidney diseases1.580.93–2.690.09

Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Clinical Predictors of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Nonsusceptibility in the Episodes of Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05. Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation. Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors of Third-Generation Cephalosporin Nonsusceptibility Among the Episodes of Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia Note: Boldface indicates statistical significance in the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Antimicrobial Therapy and Clinical Outcomes

The common antimicrobials empirically administered for patients with 3GC-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia were 3GCs (32%), 2GCs (16%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (14%). Appropriate empirical (30%vs.82%, P<0.001) or definitive (80% vs.94%, P<0.001) therapy was less commonly prescribed among patients infected by 3GC-NS isolates, compared to those by 3GC-susceptible isolates (Table 5). Furthermore, patients with 3GC-NS Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia more often had a septic shock at presentation (20% vs.11%, P=0.007) and had a higher in-hospital crude mortality rate (21%vs 11%, P=0.005) than those infected by 3GC-susceptible isolates (Table 5).
Table 5

Bacteremia Severity, Antimicrobial Therapy and Outcomes of Patients with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia, Stratified by Third-Generation Cephalosporin Susceptibility

VariablesPatient Numbers (%)P value
Susceptible, n=327Nonsusceptible, n=172
Bacteremia severity
 Blood leukocyte, x103/mm3, mean ± SD13.3 ± 7.413.0 ± 6.00.72
 Time-to-positivity, hours, mean ± SD (n=392)24.5 ± 16.626.1 ± 19.50.39
Initial presentation of septic shock36 (11.0)35 (20.3)0.007
 Requirement of intensive care61 (18.7)33 (19.2)0.90
Appropriate antimicrobial therapy
Empirical267 (81.7)52 (30.2)<0.001
Definitive307 (93.9)138 (80.2)<0.001
Outcomes
 Length of hospitalization, days, mean ± SD20.2 ± 58.126.9 ± 41.30.15
In-hospital crude mortality37 (11.3)36 (20.9)0.005

Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance under the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05.

Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Bacteremia Severity, Antimicrobial Therapy and Outcomes of Patients with Monomicrobial Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremia, Stratified by Third-Generation Cephalosporin Susceptibility Notes: Data are given as number (percent), unless otherwise specified. Boldface indicates statistical significance under the univariate analysis, ie, a P value of <0.05. Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.

Discussion

Patients with 3GC-NS mEB were associated with longer hospital or ICU stays and a worse outcome. However, such a result needs to be interpreted with caution, because patients infected by the isolates of antimicrobial-resistant Enterobacteriaceae were older and had more comorbidities.1,26 Moreover, the other explanation for unfavorable prognoses might result from delayed administration of appropriate antibiotics.18,19 Similar to the previous report,1 inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy was more common in patients with 3GC-NS mEB than in those with bacteremia due to 3GC-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae isolates. In our study, male patients, nosocomial-acquired bacteremia, and usage of nasogastric tube were positively associated with 3GC-NS; and in contrast, P. mirabilis bacteremic episodes and age were negatively linked to 3GC-NS. Factors correlating to the acquisition of Enterobacteriaceae strains harboring 3GC resistance have been identified before, including male gender,1 prior exposure to antimicrobial agents,1,16,26 underlying disease,1,16,26 indwelling device or prosthesis,16,26 or surgery.26 Likewise, several variables, including male gender, age, usage of nasogastric tube, and bacteremic episodes due to K. pneumoniae, were independently linked to 3GC-NS mEB in our cohort. However, some predictors identified in previous investigations,1,16,26 such as the presence of an invasive prosthesis or intravascular catheter, recent surgery or hospitalization, or residence in nursing home or long-term care facility were not assessed in the present retrospective study. The ratio of appropriate empirical therapy was lower among patients infected by either 3GC-NS (30%) or 3GC-susceptible isolates (82%) in our study. In a retrospective Dutch study of bacteremia episodes caused by 3GC-resistant and 3GC-sensitive Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia in 2015, 56% and 94% were empirically treated with appropriate antibiotics, respectively.27 Nevertheless, the 3GC-resistant rate in the former study was 8.3% (64/773),27 much lower than the 3GC-NS rate of 34.5% (172/499) in our study. The higher nonsusceptible rates toward antimicrobial agents among Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia isolates in recent years led clinicians more difficulty in selecting appropriate empirical antimicrobial agents, especially for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria.28 Though ESBL-producing phenotype was not examined, the high 3GC-NS rate among our Enterobacteriaceae isolates might partly be contributed by the presence of ESBL-producing isolates. In the era of reduced susceptibility to 3GCs among Enterobacteriaceae isolates, the information of the clinical parameters predictive of 3GC-NS identified in our study is helpful to select appropriate antimicrobial agents. The rapid emergence of drug-resistant strains and novel viruses has motivated the search for new anti-infectious agents. In recent years, a reexamination of traditional medicines has become more common and has already provided several new antibiotics. Some new clinical therapies, such as pump inhibitors in association with common antibiotic therapies and natural molecules such as oils essential are already clinically available. For example, Usai D and other scholars have shown that novel antibiotics with new modes of action are urgently required to suppress the rise of MDR bacteria. An alternative approach would be to identify molecules that can interfere with the process of efflux.29 In 2006, researchers discovered that the region around amino acid Val-610 in YhiV appears to be involved in determining recognition and efficiency of export of a number of MDR efflux pump substrates. This single point mutation in the periplasmic loop of the pump can increase resistance to a given drug such as a fluoroquinolone while decreasing resistance to another one.30 Moreover, South African scholars have shown that in vitro potentiation of carbapenems with tannic acid against carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriaceae.31 In addition, antiviral activities of essential oils from the leaves, rhizomes, and whole plant of Hornstedtiabella were investigated, the GC/MS analysis showed that β-pinene, E-β-caryophyllene, and α-humulene were found at high concentrations in the essential oils.32 Other researchers discovered that Biological activities of essential oil extracted from leaves of Atalantiasessiflora and Limnocitrus littoralis that showed antimicrobial activities against Gram-positive strains as Staphylococcus; Gram-negative bacteria such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli.33,34 Furthermore, American scholars have pointed out that in vitro activity of essential oils against Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates, including Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae.35 Traditional medicine plants are likely to provide further new antibiotics in the future. However, the use of plant extracts or pure natural compounds in combination with conventional antibiotics may hold greater promise for rapidly providing affordable treatment options. There were several limitations in this study. First, though there were only nearly 500 cases of mEB included in the cohort, it is a multicenter study conducted at three district and regional hospitals in southern Taiwan, representing the population other than the patients cared for at medical centers. Second, recall biases due to the retrospective nature of study design unavoidably exist, and the number of factors related to 3GC NS are likely to be underestimated. Third, not all 3GCs (such as cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime) were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. Overestimating or underestimating 3GC-NS among the included Enterobacteriaceae isolates is not known, and the study results should be interpreted cautiously. Last, other clinical variables, such as the degree or timing of source control, or the dosage or regimens of antimicrobial therapy were assessed as the potential ones affecting the prognosis of the cases of mEB.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the presence of 3GC-NS in the etiological pathogens of mEB is independently correlated with a poor prognosis. Rapid identification of antimicrobial resistance by clinical predictors or new methods of susceptibility testing shall be incorporated in antimicrobial stewardship programs to improve patient outcomes.
  33 in total

1.  Clinical manifestations, risk factors and prognosis of patients with Morganella morganii sepsis.

Authors:  David Erlanger; Marc Victor Assous; Yonit Wiener-Well; Amos Moshe Yinnon; Eli Ben-Chetrit
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.399

2.  Propensity-matched analysis of the impact of extended-spectrum β-lactamase production on adults with community-onset Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species, and Proteus mirabilis bacteremia.

Authors:  Ching-Chi Lee; Chung-Hsun Lee; Ming-Yuan Hong; Chih-Chia Hsieh; Hung-Jen Tang; Wen-Chien Ko
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.399

3.  Bloodstream infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: The role of virulence genes.

Authors:  Wan-Ting Hung; Ming-Fang Cheng; Fan-Chen Tseng; Yao-Shen Chen; Susan Shin-Jung Lee; Tsung-Hsien Chang; Hsi-Hsun Lin; Chih-Hsin Hung; Jiun-Ling Wang
Journal:  J Microbiol Immunol Infect       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.399

4.  Nosocomial bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, Finland, 1999-2013: Trends, patient characteristics and mortality.

Authors:  Timi Martelius; Jari Jalava; Tommi Kärki; Teemu Möttönen; Jukka Ollgren; Outi Lyytikäinen
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2015-11-18

5.  Role of comorbidity in mortality related to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a prospective study using the Charlson weighted index of comorbidity.

Authors:  Olivier Lesens; Cédric Methlin; Yves Hansmann; Véronique Remy; Martin Martinot; Colm Bergin; Pierre Meyer; Daniel Christmann
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Comorbidity of chronic diseases in general practice.

Authors:  F G Schellevis; J van der Velden; E van de Lisdonk; J T van Eijk; C van Weel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Mortality and hospital stay associated with resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia: estimating the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe.

Authors:  Marlieke E A de Kraker; Peter G Davey; Hajo Grundmann
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  A prediction tool for nosocomial multi-drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli infections in critically ill patients - prospective observational study.

Authors:  Anupama Vasudevan; Amartya Mukhopadhyay; Jialiang Li; Eugene Goh Yu Yuen; Paul Ananth Tambyah
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Leaves of Paramignya trimera (Oliv.) Guillaum and Limnocitrus littoralis (Miq.) Swingle.

Authors:  Nhan Trong Le; Duc Viet Ho; Tuan Quoc Doan; Anh Tuan Le; Ain Raal; Donatella Usai; Giuseppina Sanna; Antonio Carta; Paola Rappelli; Nicia Diaz; Piero Cappuccinelli; Stefania Zanetti; Hoai Thi Nguyen; Matthew Gavino Donadu
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24

10.  Phytochemical Compositions and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from the Leaves, Rhizomes and Whole Plant of Hornstedtia bella Škorničk.

Authors:  Matthew Gavino Donadu; Nhan Trong Le; Duc Viet Ho; Tuan Quoc Doan; Anh Tuan Le; Ain Raal; Marianna Usai; Mauro Marchetti; Giuseppina Sanna; Silvia Madeddu; Paola Rappelli; Nicia Diaz; Paola Molicotti; Antonio Carta; Sandra Piras; Donatella Usai; Hoai Thi Nguyen; Piero Cappuccinelli; Stefania Zanetti
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.