Carol Wogrin1, Nicola Willis1, Abigail Mutsinze1, Silindweyinkosi Chinoda2, Ruth Verhey2, Dixon Chibanda2,3,4, Sarah Bernays5,6. 1. Africaid, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe. 2. Friendship Bench, Avondale, Harare, Zimbabwe. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare, Zimbabwe. 4. Centre for Global Mental Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 5. Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom. 6. School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Adolescents living with HIV have poor treatment outcomes, including lower rates of viral suppression, than other age groups. Emerging evidence suggests a connection between improved mental health and increased adherence. Strengthening the focus on mental health could support increased rates of viral suppression. In sub-Saharan Africa clinical services for mental health care are extremely limited. Additional mechanisms are required to address the unmet mental health needs of this group. We consider the role that community-based peer supporters, a cadre operating at scale with adolescents, could play in the provision of lay-support for mental health. METHODS: We conducted qualitative research to explore the experiences of peer supporters involved in delivering a peer-led mental health intervention in Zimbabwe as part of a randomized control trial (Zvandiri-Friendship Bench trial). We conducted 2 focus group discussions towards the end of the trial with 20 peer supporters (aged 18-24) from across 10 intervention districts and audio recorded 200 of the peer supporters' monthly case reviews. These data were thematically analysed to explore how peer supporters reflect on what was required of them given the problems that clients raised and what they themselves needed in delivering mental health support. RESULTS: A primary strength of the peer support model, reflected across the datasets, is that it enables adolescents to openly discuss their problems with peer supporters, confident that there is reciprocal trust and understanding derived from the similarity in their lived experiences with HIV. There are potential risks for peer supporters, including being overwhelmed by engaging with and feeling responsible for resolving relationally and structurally complex problems, which warrant considerable supervision. To support this cadre critical elements are needed: a clearly defined scope for the manageable provision of mental health support; a strong triage and referral system for complex cases; mechanisms to support the inclusion of caregivers; and sustained investment in training and ongoing supervision. CONCLUSION: Extending peer support to explicitly include a focus on mental health has enormous potential. From this empirical study we have developed a framework of core considerations and principles (the TRUST Framework) to guide the implementation of adequate supportive infrastructure in place to enhance the opportunities and mitigate risks.
INTRODUCTION: Adolescents living with HIV have poor treatment outcomes, including lower rates of viral suppression, than other age groups. Emerging evidence suggests a connection between improved mental health and increased adherence. Strengthening the focus on mental health could support increased rates of viral suppression. In sub-Saharan Africa clinical services for mental health care are extremely limited. Additional mechanisms are required to address the unmet mental health needs of this group. We consider the role that community-based peer supporters, a cadre operating at scale with adolescents, could play in the provision of lay-support for mental health. METHODS: We conducted qualitative research to explore the experiences of peer supporters involved in delivering a peer-led mental health intervention in Zimbabwe as part of a randomized control trial (Zvandiri-Friendship Bench trial). We conducted 2 focus group discussions towards the end of the trial with 20 peer supporters (aged 18-24) from across 10 intervention districts and audio recorded 200 of the peer supporters' monthly case reviews. These data were thematically analysed to explore how peer supporters reflect on what was required of them given the problems that clients raised and what they themselves needed in delivering mental health support. RESULTS: A primary strength of the peer support model, reflected across the datasets, is that it enables adolescents to openly discuss their problems with peer supporters, confident that there is reciprocal trust and understanding derived from the similarity in their lived experiences with HIV. There are potential risks for peer supporters, including being overwhelmed by engaging with and feeling responsible for resolving relationally and structurally complex problems, which warrant considerable supervision. To support this cadre critical elements are needed: a clearly defined scope for the manageable provision of mental health support; a strong triage and referral system for complex cases; mechanisms to support the inclusion of caregivers; and sustained investment in training and ongoing supervision. CONCLUSION: Extending peer support to explicitly include a focus on mental health has enormous potential. From this empirical study we have developed a framework of core considerations and principles (the TRUST Framework) to guide the implementation of adequate supportive infrastructure in place to enhance the opportunities and mitigate risks.
Authors: Webster Mavhu; Jessica Berwick; Petronella Chirawu; Memory Makamba; Andrew Copas; Jeffrey Dirawo; Nicola Willis; Ricardo Araya; Melanie A Abas; Elizabeth L Corbett; Stanley Mungofa; Susan M Laver; Frances M Cowan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christina A Laurenzi; Sarah Skeen; Sarah Gordon; Olamide Akin-Olugbade; Nina Abrahams; Melissa Bradshaw; Amanda Brand; Stefani du Toit; G J Melendez-Torres; Mark Tomlinson; Chiara Servili; Tarun Dua; David A Ross Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: John Mark Wiginton; Jessica L Maksut; Sarah M Murray; Jura L Augustinavicius; Meaghan Kall; Valerie Delpech; Stefan D Baral Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2021-10-03
Authors: Leslie A Enane; Edith Apondi; Claire Liepmann; Judith J Toromo; Mark Omollo; Salim Bakari; Michael Scanlon; Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Rachel C Vreeman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-03-30 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Carmen H Logie; Moses Okumu; Maya Latif; Samantha Parker; Robert Hakiza; Daniel Kibuuka Musoke; Simon Mwima; Shamilah Batte; Peter Kyambadde Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-01-31
Authors: Virginia M Burke; Christiana Frimpong; Sam Miti; Jonathan K Mwansa; Elizabeth A Abrams; Katherine G Merrill; Julie A Denison Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 3.240