Jeffrey Scott Weese1, Nathan Slovis2, Joyce Rousseau1. 1. Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 2. McGee Medical Center, Hagyard Equine Medical Institute, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile is important for the development and assessment of infection prevention and control practices, as well as surveillance methods and interpretation of diagnostic testing results. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to longitudinally evaluate C. difficile shedding in neonatal foals and mares admitted to a referral hospital neonatal intensive care unit. ANIMALS: Foals admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, along with their dams. METHODS: Rectal swabs were collected from mares and foals at admission, and then approximately every 3 days, when possible. Selective culture for C. difficile was performed and isolates were characterized by toxin gene PCR and ribotyping. RESULTS: Clostridium difficile was isolated from 103/409 (25%) samples; 65/208 (31%) from foals and 38/201 (19%) from mares. Cumulatively, C. difficile was isolated from at least 1 sample from 50/113 (44%) foals and 30/97 (31%) mares. No association was found between hospitalization day and isolation of C. difficile (P = .13). Twenty-three different ribotypes were identified, with ribotype 078 predominating. Fifteen foals had 2 positive samples during hospitalization. In only 6/15 (40%) foals was the same strain identified both times (5 ribotype 078 and 1 ribotype 012). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Clostridium difficile is an important pathogen in adult horses and foals, and our findings highlight the complexity surrounding the epidemiology of this opportunistic pathogen. It can be found commonly, transiently, and cluster within a facility in the absence of identifiable disease occurrences or clusters.
BACKGROUND: Understanding the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile is important for the development and assessment of infection prevention and control practices, as well as surveillance methods and interpretation of diagnostic testing results. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to longitudinally evaluate C. difficile shedding in neonatal foals and mares admitted to a referral hospital neonatal intensive care unit. ANIMALS: Foals admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, along with their dams. METHODS: Rectal swabs were collected from mares and foals at admission, and then approximately every 3 days, when possible. Selective culture for C. difficile was performed and isolates were characterized by toxin gene PCR and ribotyping. RESULTS:Clostridium difficile was isolated from 103/409 (25%) samples; 65/208 (31%) from foals and 38/201 (19%) from mares. Cumulatively, C. difficile was isolated from at least 1 sample from 50/113 (44%) foals and 30/97 (31%) mares. No association was found between hospitalization day and isolation of C. difficile (P = .13). Twenty-three different ribotypes were identified, with ribotype 078 predominating. Fifteen foals had 2 positive samples during hospitalization. In only 6/15 (40%) foals was the same strain identified both times (5 ribotype 078 and 1 ribotype 012). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Clostridium difficile is an important pathogen in adult horses and foals, and our findings highlight the complexity surrounding the epidemiology of this opportunistic pathogen. It can be found commonly, transiently, and cluster within a facility in the absence of identifiable disease occurrences or clusters.
Authors: S E McNamara; N Abdujamilova; P Somsel; M J Gordoncillo; J M DeDecker; P C Bartlett Journal: Zoonoses Public Health Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.702
Authors: R O S Silva; M G Ribeiro; M S Palhares; A S Borges; R P A Maranhão; M X Silva; T M Lucas; G Olivo; F C F Lobato Journal: Equine Vet J Date: 2013-03-03 Impact factor: 2.888
Authors: Angelika Schoster; Luis Guillermo Arroyo; Henry Rolf Staempfli; Patricia Elisabeth Shewen; Jeffrey Scott Weese Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Sofie M van Dorp; Sabine C de Greeff; Céline Harmanus; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Olaf M Dekkers; Cornelis W Knetsch; Greetje A Kampinga; Daan W Notermans; Ed J Kuijper Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.240