Literature DB >> 33654124

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty is not associated with an earlier return to work compared to a straight-stem design.

Georg Hauer1, Maria Smolle2, Sabrina Zaussinger2, Joerg Friesenbichler2, Andreas Leithner2, Werner Maurer-Ertl3.   

Abstract

Return to work (RTW) has been specifically identified as a high priority in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). This investigation sought to assess the effect of the stem design on patients' RTW. Secondly, the study aimed to identify risk factors that lead to a delayed RTW. Questionnaires inquiring about RTW, employment history, educational level, type of work, physical demands and joint awareness were administered by post. Further data were collected from patients' hospital records. 176 patients who underwent THA using a short-stem and 97 patients using a straight-stem design were compared. The median return to work time was 10 weeks [IQR 7-14 weeks], with no significant difference between the two groups (short stems vs. straight stems; 10 [IQR 7-14] vs. 11 [7.5-13.5] weeks; p = 0.693). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, self-employment vs. employee (p = 0.001), dimension of preoperative workload (p = 0.001), preoperative sick leave (p < 0.001), and hospital length of stay (LOS) (p < 0.001) independently affected the period until work was resumed. The Forgotten-Joint-Score-12 showed no significant difference between the two groups. The data show that the majority of THA patients can expect to resume work and stem design has no impact on RTW. Employees with preoperative sick leave, prolonged hospital LOS and low workload are at higher risk for a delayed RTW.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33654124      PMCID: PMC7925530          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82805-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems. An experimental study in human femora.

Authors:  A Aamodt; J Lund-Larsen; J Eine; E Andersen; P Benum; O S Husby
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-08

2.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Kevin Ong; Edmund Lau; Fionna Mowat; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Do patients return to work after hip arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Erin L Ruh; Qin Zhang; Craig J Della Valle; C Anderson Engh; Michael E Berend; Javad Parvizi; John C Clohisy; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Are patient-related pre-operative factors influencing return to work after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Petteri Lankinen; Raul Laasik; Mika Kivimäki; Ville Aalto; Mikhail Saltychev; Jussi Vahtera; Keijo Mäkelä
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; Joshua J Jacobs; R Michael Meneghini; Craig Della Valle; Wayne Paprosky; Aaron G Rosenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Return to work following knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A J Foote; H K Smith; S C Jonas; R Greenwood; A E Weale
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Changing demographics of patients with total joint replacement.

Authors:  Roy D Crowninshield; Aaron G Rosenberg; Scott M Sporer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Preoperative Risk Factor Optimization Lowers Hospital Length of Stay and Postoperative Emergency Department Visits in Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

Authors:  Chloe C Dlott; Anne Moore; Christen Nelson; Dannielle Stone; Yunshan Xu; Jensa C Morris; David H Gibson; Lee E Rubin; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Complications and Obesity in Arthroplasty-A Hip is Not a Knee.

Authors:  David E DeMik; Nicholas A Bedard; S Blake Dowdle; Jacob M Elkins; Timothy S Brown; Yubo Gao; John J Callaghan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes C Reichert; Eberhard von Rottkay; Franz Roth; Tim Renz; Johannes Hausmann; Julius Kranz; Lars Rackwitz; Ulrich Nöth; Maximilian Rudert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  1 in total

1.  Three-year migration analysis of a new metaphyseal anchoring short femoral stem in THA using EBRA-FCA.

Authors:  Patrick Reinbacher; Maria Anna Smolle; Joerg Friesenbichler; Alexander Draschl; Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.