Literature DB >> 33650510

Evaluation of braking performances of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip: Are there alternatives to a brake simulator?

Maximilian von Bernstorff1, Felix Bausenhart2, Jennifer Rapp1, Martina Feierabend3, Ingmar Ipach2, Ulf Krister Hofmann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to develop and evaluate a simple tool for daily practice that might allow a rough estimate of individual braking performance (brake response time, BRT) of patients with osteoarthritis or those with arthroplasty of the knee or hip.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we examined 162 patients (72 men, 90 women; mean age = 64±12.8 years) who suffered from osteoarthritis of the knee (n=45) or hip (n=64) or who underwent a total hip (n=37) or knee (n=16) arthroplasty. BRT of each patient was measured in a brake simulator. The results were compared to demographic data, various clinical tests, and pain surveys. From these data, a multiple linear regression model was developed.
RESULTS: From the observed correlations, the regression model consisted of age (correlation with BRT τ=0.176, p=0.001), sex (τ=0.361, p<0.001), Hau's step test (τ=-0.345, p<0.001), and the pain dimension of the Hip disability/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (τ=-0.265, p<0.001). We, therefore, suggested the following formula: BRTest = 634.8 - (8.8 x Hau) + 119.2 (for women) + (3.0 x age) - (1.3 x H/KOOS Pain). The above-mentioned variables contributed significantly to the prediction of BRT and could achieve a multiple R² adj of 0.31. The model leaves a residual standard error (i.e., SD of the residuals) of 158.4 ms, which is superior to a model without predictors; F (4.140)=16.8, p<0.001.
CONCLUSION: Our evaluated regression model offers an uncertainty which is comparable to the one based on a fixed time period after surgery or a defined pathologic condition. The high variability even within a single patient over several brake simulator measurements makes it unlikely for a model to be generated solely based on clinical testing. Taking the available data in literature into account, we advise caution when formulating a real-time- or condition-based recommendation. We rather suggest being aware of risk factors that might lead to impaired BRT to sensitize patients to their impaired ability to drive. We identify such risk factors, namely old age, female sex, impaired musculoskeletal function, as tested in Hau's step test, and high levels of pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33650510      PMCID: PMC7932726          DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2021.19041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  29 in total

Review 1.  Spinal and supraspinal effects of activity in ligament afferents.

Authors:  Per Sjölander; Håkan Johansson; Mats Djupsjöbacka
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  When is it safe for patients to drive after right total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Victor H Hernandez; Alvin Ong; Fabio Orozco; Anne M Madden; Zachary Post
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Brake response time is significantly impaired after total knee arthroplasty: investigation of performing an emergency stop while driving a car.

Authors:  Maurice Jordan; Ulf-Krister Hofmann; Ina Rondak; Marco Götze; Torsten Kluba; Ingmar Ipach
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.159

4.  The effect of total hip replacement on driving reactions.

Authors:  W MacDonald; J W Owen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-03

5.  Radiographic Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis and the Ability to Drive.

Authors:  Maximilian von Bernstorff; Martina Feierabend; Maurice Jordan; Christopher Glatzel; Ingmar Ipach; Ulf Krister Hofmann
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Single-step test for unilateral limb ability following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adam Rubin Marmon; Jodie A McClelland; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Practice effects associated with repeated assessment of a clinical test of reaction time.

Authors:  Gianluca Del Rossi; Alfonso Malaguti; Samanta Del Rossi
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Driving reaction time before and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  T Nguyen; R Hau; J Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Driving after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Geoffrey S Marecek; Michael F Schafer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons.

Authors:  D Podsiadlo; S Richardson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.