Literature DB >> 31053619

Heat-moulded versus custom-made mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised non-inferiority trial.

Jean Louis Pépin1,2, Nathalie Raymond3, Olivier Lacaze4, Nathalie Aisenberg5, Jérôme Forcioli6, Eric Bonte7, Arnaud Bourdin8, Sandrine Launois9,10, Renaud Tamisier9,10, Nicolas Molinari11.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Custom-made mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are reported as providing higher efficacy rates compared with thermoplastic heat-moulded MADs but at the price of higher costs and treatment delays.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable MAD (ONIRIS; ONIRIS SAS, Rueil Malmaison, France) is non-inferior to a custom-made acrylic titratable MAD (TALI; ONIRIS SAS, Rueil Malmaison, France) for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).
METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, open, randomised controlled trial of patients with OSA refusing or not tolerating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Participants were randomly assigned to a thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable device or a custom-made acrylic device for 2 months with stratification by centre and OSA severity. The non-inferiority primary outcome was a ≥50% reduction in apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) or achieving AHI <10 events/hour at 2 months. The non-inferiority margin was preset as a difference between groups of 20% for the primary outcome in the per-protocol analysis. MAIN
RESULTS: Of 198 patients (mean age 51 [SD, 12] years; 138 [72.6%] men; mean body mass index 26 [SD, 2.7] kg/m2; mean AHI 26.6/hour [SD, 10.4]), 100 received TALI and 98 ONIRIS. In per-protocol analysis, the response rate was 51.7% in the TALI group versus 53.6% in the ONIRIS group (absolute difference 1.9%; 90% CI: 11% to 15%, within the non-inferiority margin). Effectiveness was the same for severity, symptoms, quality of life and blood pressure reduction. Patients in ONIRIS group reported more side effects and adherence was slightly better with TALI.
CONCLUSION: In patients with OSA refusing or not tolerating CPAP, the thermoplastic heat-moulded titratable MAD was non-inferior in the short-term to the custom-made acrylic MAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02348970. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  heat-moulded; mandibular advancement device; obstructive sleep apnoea; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31053619     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  5 in total

1.  Predicting treatment response to mandibular advancement therapy using a titratable thermoplastic device.

Authors:  Wojciech Trzepizur; Benjamin Adrian; Marc Le Vaillant; Nicole Meslier; Jean-Daniel Kün-Darbois; Frédéric Gagnadoux
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Pilot Study of a New Mandibular Advancement Device.

Authors:  Marzia Segù; Giovanna Campagnoli; Marco Di Blasio; Antonio Santagostini; Matteo Pollis; Luca Levrini
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Force Distribution of a Novel Core-Reinforced Multilayered Mandibular Advancement Device.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Soo-Yeon Lee; Hobeen Yu; Jin-Young Park; Kyung-A Kim; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Mandibular Advancement Devices for OSA: An Alternative to CPAP?

Authors:  Claire E Francis; Tim Quinnell
Journal:  Pulm Ther       Date:  2020-11-10

Review 5.  Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Marijke Dieltjens; Olivier Vanderveken
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.