B Gaborit1,2, P Ancel1, F Kober3, A Dutour4,5, A E Abdullah2, F Maurice1, I Abdesselam1,3, A Calen3, A Soghomonian1,2, M Houssays6, I Varlet3, M Eisinger1,2, A Lasbleiz1,3, F Peiretti1, C E Bornet7, Y Lefur3, L Pini3, S Rapacchi3, M Bernard3, N Resseguier7,8, P Darmon1,2. 1. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, Marseille, France. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Pôle ENDO, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13915, Marseille cedex 20, France. 3. Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, CRMBM, Marseille, France. 4. Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, INRAE, C2VN, Marseille, France. anne.dutour@ap-hm.fr. 5. Department of Endocrinology, Metabolic Diseases and Nutrition, Pôle ENDO, APHM, Hôpital Nord, Chemin Des Bourrely, 13915, Marseille cedex 20, France. anne.dutour@ap-hm.fr. 6. Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Medical Evaluation Department, CIC-CPCET, 13005, Marseille, France. 7. Support Unit for Clinical Research and Economic Evaluation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13385, Marseille, France. 8. Aix-Marseille Univ, EA 3279 CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Marseille, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has demonstrated cardiovascular and renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We hypothesized that empaglifozin (EMPA) could modulate ectopic fat stores and myocardial energetics in high-fat-high-sucrose (HFHS) diet mice and in type 2 diabetics (T2D). METHODS:C57BL/6HFHS mice (n = 24) and T2D subjects (n = 56) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with EMPA (30 mg/kg in mice, 10 mg/day in humans) or with placebo. A 4.7 T or 3 T MRI with 1H-MRS evaluation-myocardial fat (primary endpoint) and liver fat content (LFC)-were performed at baseline and at 12 weeks. In humans, standard cardiac MRI was coupled with myocardial energetics (PCr/ATP) measured with 31P-MRS. Subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal, visceral (VAT), epicardial and pancreatic fat were also evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in epicardial fat volume between EMPA and placebo from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were the differences in PCr/ATP ratio, myocardial, liver and pancreatic fat content, SAT and VAT between groups at 12 weeks. RESULTS: In mice fed HFHS, EMPA significantly improved glucose tolerance and increased blood ketone bodies (KB) and β-hydroxybutyrate levels (p < 0.05) compared to placebo. Mice fed HFHS had increased myocardial and liver fat content compared to standard diet mice. EMPA significantly attenuated liver fat content by 55%, (p < 0.001) but had no effect on myocardial fat. In the human study, all the 56 patients had normal LV function with mean LVEF = 63.4 ± 7.9%. Compared to placebo, T2D patients treated with EMPA significantly lost weight (- 2.6 kg [- 1.2; - 3.7]) and improved their HbA1c by 0.88 ± 0.74%. Hematocrit and EPO levels were significantly increased in the EMPA group compared to placebo (p < 0.0001, p = 0.041). EMPA significantly increased glycosuria and plasma KB levels compared to placebo (p < 0.0001, p = 0.012, respectively), and significantly reduced liver fat content (- 27 ± 23 vs. - 2 ± 24%, p = 0.0005) and visceral fat (- 7.8% [- 15.3; - 5.6] vs. - 0.1% [- 1.1;6.5], p = 0.043), but had no effect on myocardial or epicardial fat. At 12 weeks, no significant change was observed in the myocardial PCr/ATP (p = 0.57 between groups). CONCLUSIONS:EMPA effectively reduced liver fat in mice and humans without changing epicardial, myocardial fat or myocardial energetics, rebutting the thrifty substrate hypothesis for cardiovascular protection of SGLT2 inhibitors. Trial registration NCT, NCT03118336. Registered 18 April 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03118336.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Empagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has demonstrated cardiovascular and renal protection in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We hypothesized that empaglifozin (EMPA) could modulate ectopic fat stores and myocardial energetics in high-fat-high-sucrose (HFHS) diet mice and in type 2 diabetics (T2D). METHODS: C57BL/6 HFHS mice (n = 24) and T2D subjects (n = 56) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with EMPA (30 mg/kg in mice, 10 mg/day in humans) or with placebo. A 4.7 T or 3 T MRI with 1H-MRS evaluation-myocardial fat (primary endpoint) and liver fat content (LFC)-were performed at baseline and at 12 weeks. In humans, standard cardiac MRI was coupled with myocardial energetics (PCr/ATP) measured with 31P-MRS. Subcutaneous (SAT) abdominal, visceral (VAT), epicardial and pancreatic fat were also evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in epicardial fat volume between EMPA and placebo from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were the differences in PCr/ATP ratio, myocardial, liver and pancreatic fat content, SAT and VAT between groups at 12 weeks. RESULTS: In mice fed HFHS, EMPA significantly improved glucose tolerance and increased blood ketone bodies (KB) and β-hydroxybutyrate levels (p < 0.05) compared to placebo. Mice fed HFHS had increased myocardial and liver fat content compared to standard diet mice. EMPA significantly attenuated liver fat content by 55%, (p < 0.001) but had no effect on myocardial fat. In the human study, all the 56 patients had normal LV function with mean LVEF = 63.4 ± 7.9%. Compared to placebo, T2D patients treated with EMPA significantly lost weight (- 2.6 kg [- 1.2; - 3.7]) and improved their HbA1c by 0.88 ± 0.74%. Hematocrit and EPO levels were significantly increased in the EMPA group compared to placebo (p < 0.0001, p = 0.041). EMPA significantly increased glycosuria and plasma KB levels compared to placebo (p < 0.0001, p = 0.012, respectively), and significantly reduced liver fat content (- 27 ± 23 vs. - 2 ± 24%, p = 0.0005) and visceral fat (- 7.8% [- 15.3; - 5.6] vs. - 0.1% [- 1.1;6.5], p = 0.043), but had no effect on myocardial or epicardial fat. At 12 weeks, no significant change was observed in the myocardial PCr/ATP (p = 0.57 between groups). CONCLUSIONS:EMPA effectively reduced liver fat in mice and humans without changing epicardial, myocardial fat or myocardial energetics, rebutting the thrifty substrate hypothesis for cardiovascular protection of SGLT2 inhibitors. Trial registration NCT, NCT03118336. Registered 18 April 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03118336.
Authors: Julia Moellmann; Barbara M Klinkhammer; Patrick Droste; Ben Kappel; Elias Haj-Yehia; Sebastian Maxeiner; Anna Artati; Jerzy Adamski; Peter Boor; Katharina Schütt; Gary D Lopaschuk; Subodh Verma; Nikolaus Marx; Michael Lehrke Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.187
Authors: Ashish Gupta; Ashwin Akki; Yibin Wang; Michelle K Leppo; V P Chacko; D Brian Foster; Viviane Caceres; Sa Shi; Jonathan A Kirk; Jason Su; Shenghan Lai; Nazareno Paolocci; Charles Steenbergen; Gary Gerstenblith; Robert G Weiss Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Stephen D Wiviott; Itamar Raz; Marc P Bonaca; Ofri Mosenzon; Eri T Kato; Avivit Cahn; Michael G Silverman; Thomas A Zelniker; Julia F Kuder; Sabina A Murphy; Deepak L Bhatt; Lawrence A Leiter; Darren K McGuire; John P H Wilding; Christian T Ruff; Ingrid A M Gause-Nilsson; Martin Fredriksson; Peter A Johansson; Anna-Maria Langkilde; Marc S Sabatine Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-11-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carlos G Santos-Gallego; Juan Antonio Requena-Ibanez; Rodolfo San Antonio; Kiyotake Ishikawa; Shin Watanabe; Belen Picatoste; Eduardo Flores; Alvaro Garcia-Ropero; Javier Sanz; Roger J Hajjar; Valentin Fuster; Juan J Badimon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: AbdEl-Monem El-Sharkawy; Michael Schär; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Robert G Weiss; Paul A Bottomley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Laween Uthman; Antonius Baartscheer; Boris Bleijlevens; Cees A Schumacher; Jan W T Fiolet; Anneke Koeman; Milena Jancev; Markus W Hollmann; Nina C Weber; Ruben Coronel; Coert J Zuurbier Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jennifer J Rayner; Mark A Peterzan; William D Watson; William T Clarke; Stefan Neubauer; Christopher T Rodgers; Oliver J Rider Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alba Rojano-Toimil; Jesús Rivera-Esteban; Ramiro Manzano-Nuñez; Juan Bañares; David Martinez Selva; Pablo Gabriel-Medina; Roser Ferrer; Juan M Pericàs; Andreea Ciudin Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: Carlos King Ho Wong; Kristy Tsz Kwan Lau; Eric Ho Man Tang; Chi Ho Lee; Carmen Yu Yan Lee; Yu Cho Woo; Ivan Chi Ho Au; Kathryn Choon Beng Tan; David Tak Wai Lui Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 8.949