Casey B Bernhards1,2, Matthew W Lux1, Sarah E Katoski1, Tyler D P Goralski1, Alvin T Liem1,3, Henry S Gibbons4. 1. U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21010, USA. 2. Excet, Inc., Springfield, VA, 22150, USA. 3. DCS Corporation, Abingdon, MD, 21009, USA. 4. U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21010, USA. henry.s.gibbons.civ@mail.mil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tracking dispersal of microbial populations in the environment requires specific detection methods that discriminate between the target strain and all potential natural and artificial interferents, including previously utilized tester strains. Recent work has shown that genomic insertion of short identification tags, called "barcodes" here, allows detection of chromosomally tagged strains by real-time PCR. Manual design of these barcodes is feasible for small sets, but expansion of the technique to larger pools of distinct and well-functioning assays would be significantly aided by software-guided design. RESULTS: Here we introduce barCoder, a bioinformatics tool that facilitates the process of creating sets of uniquely identifiable barcoded strains. barCoder utilizes the genomic sequence of the target strain and a set of user-specified PCR parameters to generate a list of suggested barcode "modules" that consist of binding sites for primers and probes, and appropriate spacer sequences. Each module is designed to yield optimal PCR amplification and unique identification. Optimal amplification includes metrics such as ideal melting temperature and G+C content, appropriate spacing, and minimal stem-loop formation; unique identification includes low BLAST hits against the target organism, previously generated barcode modules, and databases (such as NCBI). We tested the ability of our algorithm to suggest appropriate barcodes by generating 12 modules for Bacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstaki-a simulant for the potential biowarfare agent Bacillus anthracis-and three each for other potential target organisms with variable G+C content. Real-time PCR detection assays directed at barcodes were specific and yielded minimal cross-reactivity with a panel of near-neighbor and potential contaminant materials. CONCLUSIONS: The barCoder algorithm facilitates the generation of synthetically barcoded biological simulants by (a) eliminating the task of creating modules by hand, (b) minimizing optimization of PCR assays, and (c) reducing effort wasted on non-unique barcode modules.
BACKGROUND: Tracking dispersal of microbial populations in the environment requires specific detection methods that discriminate between the target strain and all potential natural and artificial interferents, including previously utilized tester strains. Recent work has shown that genomic insertion of short identification tags, called "barcodes" here, allows detection of chromosomally tagged strains by real-time PCR. Manual design of these barcodes is feasible for small sets, but expansion of the technique to larger pools of distinct and well-functioning assays would be significantly aided by software-guided design. RESULTS: Here we introduce barCoder, a bioinformatics tool that facilitates the process of creating sets of uniquely identifiable barcoded strains. barCoder utilizes the genomic sequence of the target strain and a set of user-specified PCR parameters to generate a list of suggested barcode "modules" that consist of binding sites for primers and probes, and appropriate spacer sequences. Each module is designed to yield optimal PCR amplification and unique identification. Optimal amplification includes metrics such as ideal melting temperature and G+C content, appropriate spacing, and minimal stem-loop formation; unique identification includes low BLAST hits against the target organism, previously generated barcode modules, and databases (such as NCBI). We tested the ability of our algorithm to suggest appropriate barcodes by generating 12 modules for Bacillus thuringiensis serovar kurstaki-a simulant for the potential biowarfare agent Bacillus anthracis-and three each for other potential target organisms with variable G+C content. Real-time PCR detection assays directed at barcodes were specific and yielded minimal cross-reactivity with a panel of near-neighbor and potential contaminant materials. CONCLUSIONS: The barCoder algorithm facilitates the generation of synthetically barcoded biological simulants by (a) eliminating the task of creating modules by hand, (b) minimizing optimization of PCR assays, and (c) reducing effort wasted on non-unique barcode modules.
Authors: Matthew T G Holden; Richard W Titball; Sharon J Peacock; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Timothy Atkins; Lisa C Crossman; Tyrone Pitt; Carol Churcher; Karen Mungall; Stephen D Bentley; Mohammed Sebaihia; Nicholas R Thomson; Nathalie Bason; Ifor R Beacham; Karen Brooks; Katherine A Brown; Nat F Brown; Greg L Challis; Inna Cherevach; Tracy Chillingworth; Ann Cronin; Ben Crossett; Paul Davis; David DeShazer; Theresa Feltwell; Audrey Fraser; Zahra Hance; Heidi Hauser; Simon Holroyd; Kay Jagels; Karen E Keith; Mark Maddison; Sharon Moule; Claire Price; Michael A Quail; Ester Rabbinowitsch; Kim Rutherford; Mandy Sanders; Mark Simmonds; Sirirurg Songsivilai; Kim Stevens; Sarinna Tumapa; Monkgol Vesaratchavest; Sally Whitehead; Corin Yeats; Bart G Barrell; Petra C F Oyston; Julian Parkhill Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-09-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: T J Török; R V Tauxe; R P Wise; J R Livengood; R Sokolow; S Mauvais; K A Birkness; M R Skeels; J M Horan; L R Foster Journal: JAMA Date: 1997-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J Parkhill; B W Wren; N R Thomson; R W Titball; M T Holden; M B Prentice; M Sebaihia; K D James; C Churcher; K L Mungall; S Baker; D Basham; S D Bentley; K Brooks; A M Cerdeño-Tárraga; T Chillingworth; A Cronin; R M Davies; P Davis; G Dougan; T Feltwell; N Hamlin; S Holroyd; K Jagels; A V Karlyshev; S Leather; S Moule; P C Oyston; M Quail; K Rutherford; M Simmonds; J Skelton; K Stevens; S Whitehead; B G Barrell Journal: Nature Date: 2001-10-04 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Constance J Martin; Anthony M Cadena; Vivian W Leung; Philana Ling Lin; Pauline Maiello; Nathan Hicks; Michael R Chase; JoAnne L Flynn; Sarah M Fortune Journal: mBio Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Alice Gerlini; Leonarda Colomba; Leonardo Furi; Tiziana Braccini; Ana Sousa Manso; Andrea Pammolli; Bo Wang; Antonio Vivi; Maria Tassini; Nico van Rooijen; Gianni Pozzi; Susanna Ricci; Peter W Andrew; Uwe Koedel; E Richard Moxon; Marco R Oggioni Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Alice R Wattam; David Abraham; Oral Dalay; Terry L Disz; Timothy Driscoll; Joseph L Gabbard; Joseph J Gillespie; Roger Gough; Deborah Hix; Ronald Kenyon; Dustin Machi; Chunhong Mao; Eric K Nordberg; Robert Olson; Ross Overbeek; Gordon D Pusch; Maulik Shukla; Julie Schulman; Rick L Stevens; Daniel E Sullivan; Veronika Vonstein; Andrew Warren; Rebecca Will; Meredith J C Wilson; Hyun Seung Yoo; Chengdong Zhang; Yan Zhang; Bruno W Sobral Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Casey B Bernhards; Alvin T Liem; Kimberly L Berk; Pierce A Roth; Henry S Gibbons; Matthew W Lux Journal: ACS Synth Biol Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 5.249