| Literature DB >> 33648345 |
Eva Querdel1,2, Marina Reinsch1,2, Liesa Castro3,2,4, Thomas Eschenhagen1,2, Florian Weinberger1,2, Deniz Köse1,2, Andrea Bähr5,6,7, Svenja Reich1, Birgit Geertz1, Bärbel Ulmer1,2, Mirja Schulze1,2, Marc D Lemoine2,8, Tobias Krause1,2, Marta Lemme1,2, Jascha Sani1,2, Aya Shibamiya1,2, Tim Stüdemann1,2, Maria Köhne2,9, Constantin von Bibra1,2, Nadja Hornaschewitz5,6, Simon Pecha3,2, Yusuf Nejahsie1, Ingra Mannhardt1,2, Torsten Christ1,2, Hermann Reichenspurner3,2, Arne Hansen1,2, Nikolai Klymiuk5,6,7, M Krane10,11, C Kupatt5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human engineered heart tissue (EHT) transplantation represents a potential regenerative strategy for patients with heart failure and has been successful in preclinical models. Clinical application requires upscaling, adaptation to good manufacturing practices, and determination of the effective dose.Entities:
Keywords: cell transplantation; regenerative medicine; stem cells
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33648345 PMCID: PMC8126500 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Circulation ISSN: 0009-7322 Impact factor: 29.690
Figure 1.Characterization of human engineered heart tissue patches. A, Photographs of EHT patches demonstrating EHT development over a 3-week culture period. B, Phalloidin staining of human EHT patches at day 1 and day 27 after casting. Insets show low magnification overviews. C, Serial longitudinal sections stained for dystrophin. Shown are sections from the upper and lower surface and the middle of the EHT patch, respectively. D, Phalloidin whole mount and α-actinin, myosin light chain, atrial isoform, and myosin light chain, ventricular isoform staining in longitudinal sections after 21 days in culture. Analysis (E) and quantification (F) of sarcomeric organization and circularity of human induced pluripotent stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes in EHT patches compared with 2-dimensional (2D) culture. Myofibril alignment expressed as orientation correlation function (OCF). A value of 1 either indicates parallel alignment (OCF) or a perfect circle (circularity; n=10–15 cells/N=3 EHT patches or cell culture preparations; each data point represents 1 cell). Statistical analyses were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Mean±SEM values are shown, ***P<0.001. EHT indicates engineered heart tissue; and GFs, growth factors.
Figure 2.Physiological characterization of human EHT patches. A, Contractility measurements with MUSCLEMOTION (n=6). First measurement was performed after the initiation of synchronous beating. B, Concentration response curve for isoprenaline measured 3 weeks after casting (n=11) in organ bath measurements (Tyrode solution with 1.8 mmol/L calcium). B indicates baseline; Fsk, forskolin (10 µmol/L); and Ca, calcium (8 mmol/L). C, Original action potential recordings from EHT patches, small EHTs, and human left ventricular tissue (LV) paced at 2 Hz. D, Rate dependency of action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) in EHT patches (red), small EHTs (blue) compared with LV (black). Mean±SEM values are shown. ***P<0.001 for small EHTs compared with LV. E, Action potential parameters for EHT patches (red) and small EHTs (blue) compared with LV (black). Multiple action potentials (>5) were measured in each tissue preparation (n=5–8; each data point represents 1 EHT or LV sample). Statistical analyses were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Mean±SEM values are shown, *P<0.05, **P<0.01. APA indicates action potential amplitude; EHT, engineered heart tissue; and TOP, take-off potential.
Figure 3.EHT patch transplantation dose-finding study in a guinea pig cryo-injury model. A, Study design scheme. B, Dystrophin-stained short-axis sections from guinea pig hearts of the respective groups. Asterisks mark human grafts. C, Scar size quantification as percentage of the left ventricle. Quantification of graft size as percentage of scar area (D) and quantification of human Ku80+ cell number per heart section in the respective groups (E) 4 weeks after transplantation (n=14–15; each data point represents 1 heart). Statistical analysis was determined by 1-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons *P<0.05. F, Fractional area change values for baseline, postinjury, and 4 weeks after transplantation (n=19 [dose 1/2/cell-free], n=18 [dose 3]). Differences in fractional area change between postinjury and 4 weeks after transplantation. Statistical analysis was determined by 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons. *P<0.05. CMs indicates cardiomyocytes; EHT, engineered heart tissue; FAC, fractional area change; LV, left ventricular tissue; and Tx, transplantation.
Figure 6.Analysis of graft development after transplantation. A, Human Ku80 staining of guinea pig heart sections 1 and 4 weeks after transplantation and quantification of human Ku80-positive cells at the respective time points (n= 4 hearts 1 week after transplantation and n=14 hearts 4 weeks after transplantation). Statistical analysis was performed by 2-tailed unpaired Student t test. Mean±SEM values are shown. B, α-Actinin staining of EHT (baseline) and human grafts 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after transplantation. YAP staining (C) and quantification (D) of nuclear YAP in EHT patches (baseline) and human grafts 1, 2, and 4 weeks after transplantation (n=300 nuclei/N=3–5 EHT patches or hearts, each data point shows 1 EHT patch or heart). Statistical analyses were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Mean±SEM values are shown, *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. CM indicates cardiomyocyte; EHT, engineered heart tissue; and YAP, yes-associated protein.
Figure 4.Histological characterization of graft structure. A, Dystrophin-stained short-axis section from a guinea pig heart of group 3 and human Ku80 staining from an adjacent section. B, Myosin light chain, ventricular and myosin light chain, atrial isoform staining of short-axis views, and quantification of myosin light chain isoform expression in the EHT patches before transplantation and in the human grafts 4 weeks after transplantation (n=3 EHT patches or hearts; 2-tailed unpaired Student t test, ***P<0.001). C, Low and high magnification of a human graft 4 weeks after transplantation stained for α-actinin and endothelium. D, Quantification of graft vascularization 4 weeks after transplantation (# indicates that grafts in group 1 were too small for assessment of vascularization and grafts in group 2 were too small for a statistically reliable quantification). n=5 to 10 images/N=3 hearts. Each data point represents 1 heart. Statistical analyses were performed by 2-tailed unpaired Student t test, ***P<0.001. E, α-Actinin staining and quantification of sarcomere length in human grafts compared with guinea pig host myocardium (n=3 hearts, >50 sarcomeres for graft or host myocardium). Statistical analyses were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test. F, α-Actinin and connexin 43 staining of graft tissue. Insets show host myocardium for comparison. MLC indicates myosin light chain; and EHT, engineered heart tissue.
Figure 5.Analysis of cardiomyocyte proliferation and graft development after EHT patch transplantation. A, PCM1/Ki67 and human Ku80/Ki67 double immunostaining of EHT patches and human grafts 2 and 4 weeks after transplantation. Bar graphs depict the percentage of PCM1-positive and -negative nuclei (% of all nuclei in the EHT or graft) and the Ki67-positive cardiomyocyte and nonmyocyte nuclei at the respective time points. Arrows in lower panel show examples of Ki67-positive/PCM1-positive cells, assumed to be actively cycling cardiomyocytes. The star indicates a Ki67-positive/PCM1-negative nucleus, assumed to be a nonmyocyte in cell cycle. Quantification of Ki67-positive/PCM1-positive nuclei (B) and Ki67/Ku80-positive nuclei (C; EHT patches: n=600 nuclei/N=3 EHT patches; 2 weeks after transplantation: n=1500 nuclei/N=3 hearts; 4 weeks after transplantation: n=3200 nuclei/N=5 hearts). D, Human graft stained for BrdU and α-actinin. BrdU was injected daily over different time periods after transplantation (inset shows small intestine as positive control) and quantification of BrdU-positive cardiomyocytes (300–700 cardiomyocytes/N=2–3 hearts). E, Membrane (WGA), PCM1, and Aurora B kinase immunolabeling of a human graft 2 weeks after transplantation. A through E, Statistical analyses were performed by 1-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test for multiple comparisons. Mean±SEM values are shown, *P<0.05, **P<0.01. BrdU indicates bromodeoxyuridine; BW, body weight; EHT, engineered heart tissue; PCM1, pericentriolar material 1; and WGA, wheat germ agglutinin.
Figure 7.Generation and transplantation of human-scale patches. A, Photographs of the human-scale engineered heart tissue patch at the time of casting and after 6 weeks in culture. B, Contractility measurement of the human-scale engineered heart tissue patch during pacing with 2 Hz and under spontaneous beating. C, Anterior wall sections stained for dystrophin and human Ku80 2 weeks after transplantation. Asterisks mark the regions shown in higher magnification. D, α-Actinin staining of a human graft 2 weeks after transplantation.