Literature DB >> 33647203

Identifying Toxicologically Significant Compounds in Urban Wildfire Ash Using In Vitro Bioassays and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Thomas M Young1,2, Gabrielle P Black1,2, Luann Wong1, Clayton S Bloszies2,3, Oliver Fiehn2,3, Guochun He4, Michael S Denison4, Christoph F A Vogel4,5, Blythe Durbin-Johnson6.   

Abstract

Urban wildfires may generate numerous unidentified chemicals of toxicity concern. Ash samples were collected from burned residences and from an undeveloped upwind reference site, following the Tubbs fire in Sonoma County, California. The solvent extracts of ash samples were analyzed using GC- and LC-high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and using a suite of in vitro bioassays for their bioactivity toward nuclear receptors [aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), estrogen receptor (ER), and androgen receptor (AR)], their influence on the expression of genetic markers of stress and inflammation [interleukin-8 (IL-8) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)], and xenobiotic metabolism [cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1)]. Genetic markers (CYP1A1, IL-8, and COX-2) and AhR activity were significantly higher with wildfire samples than in solvent controls, whereas AR and ER activities generally were unaffected or reduced. The bioassay responses of samples from residential areas were not significantly different from the samples from the reference site despite differing chemical compositions. Suspect and nontarget screening was conducted to identify the chemicals responsible for elevated bioactivity using the multiple streams of HRMS data and open-source data analysis workflows. For the bioassay endpoint with the largest available database of pure compound results (AhR), nontarget features statistically related to whole sample bioassay response using Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients or elastic net regression were significantly more likely (by 10 and 15 times, respectively) to be known AhR agonists than the overall population of compounds tentatively identified by nontarget analysis. The findings suggest that a combination of nontarget analysis, in vitro bioassays, and statistical analysis can identify bioactive compounds in complex mixtures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33647203      PMCID: PMC8351470          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  39 in total

1.  Recombinant cell bioassays for endocrine disruptors: development of a stably transfected human ovarian cell line for the detection of estrogenic and anti-estrogenic chemicals.

Authors:  J M Rogers; M S Denison
Journal:  In Vitr Mol Toxicol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages.

Authors:  A Aderem; D M Underhill
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 28.527

3.  In vitro profiling of the potential endocrine disrupting activities affecting steroid and aryl hydrocarbon receptors of compounds and mixtures prevalent in human drinking water resources.

Authors:  Doan Tq; Connolly L; Igout A; Nott K; Muller M; Scippo Ml
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 4.  Macrophages and inflammatory mediators in tissue injury.

Authors:  D L Laskin; K J Pendino
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 13.820

5.  Evolution of the concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in burnt woodland soils.

Authors:  M S García-Falcón; B Soto-González; J Simal-Gándara
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Analysis of the antiestrogenic activity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in human ovarian carcinoma BG-1 cells.

Authors:  Jane M Rogers; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.436

7.  Enhancing the response of CALUX and CAFLUX cell bioassays for quantitative detection of dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; David S Baston; Elaine Khan; Claudio Sorrentino; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Sci China Chem       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 9.445

Review 8.  AhR and ARNT modulate ER signaling.

Authors:  Elin Swedenborg; Ingemar Pongratz
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.221

9.  Assessment of estrogenic and androgenic activity in PM10 air samples from an urban, industrial and rural area in Flanders (Belgium) using the CALUX bioassay.

Authors:  Kim Croes; Rosette Van den Heuvel; Bo Van den Bril; Jeroen Staelens; Michael S Denison; Kersten Van Langenhove; Tara Vandermarken; Marc Elskens
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 10.  Macrophage Biology, Classification, and Phenotype in Cardiovascular Disease: JACC Macrophage in CVD Series (Part 1).

Authors:  Jesse W Williams; Chiara Giannarelli; Adeeb Rahman; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Synergizes with TLR/NF-κB-Signaling for Induction of IL-22 Through Canonical and Non-Canonical AhR Pathways.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ishihara; Sarah Y Kado; Keith J Bein; Yi He; Arshia A Pouraryan; Angelika Urban; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann; Colleen Sweeney; Christoph F A Vogel
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.