Kim Croes1, Rosette Van den Heuvel2, Bo Van den Bril3, Jeroen Staelens3, Michael S Denison4, Kersten Van Langenhove5, Tara Vandermarken5, Marc Elskens5. 1. Department of Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: kim.croes@vub.ac.be. 2. Environmental Health and Risk, VITO, Mol, Belgium. 3. Unit Air, Flanders Environment Agency (VMM), Kronenburgstraat 45, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium. 4. Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA. 5. Department of Analytical, Environmental and Geo-Chemistry (AMGC), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals represent a broad class of compounds, are widespread in the environment and can pose severe health effects. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the overall estrogen and androgen activating potential of PM10 air samples at an urban, rural and industrial location in Flanders, using a human in vitro cell bioassay. METHODS: PM10 samples were collected on glass fiber filters every six days between April 2013 and January 2014 using a high-volume sampler. Extraction was executed with a hexane/acetone mixture before analysis using a recombinant estrogen- or androgen responsive human carcinoma cell line. Results were expressed as bioanalytical equivalents (BEQs) per cubic meter of air. RESULTS: High fluctuations in estrogenic activity were observed during the entire sampling period, with median BEQs of 32.1, 35.9 and 31.1 fg E2-Eq m(-)³ in the industrial, urban and rural background area, respectively. Estrogenic activity was measured in 70% of the samples, while no androgenic activity was observed in any of the samples. The estrogenic activity in the industrial area was positively correlated with the airborne concentration of the sum of the non-carcinogenic PAHs pyrene and fluoranthene (rho=0.48; p<0.01) and the sum of the carcinogenic PAHs (rho=0.36; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that no androgenic activity was present in PM10 and that although the median estrogenic activity was rather low and comparable in the three locations, high fluctuations in estrogenic response exist over time. While atmospheric PAHs contributed to the observed estrogenic response, especially in the industrial area, the chemicals responsible for the majority of estrogenic activity remain to be identified.
BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals represent a broad class of compounds, are widespread in the environment and can pose severe health effects. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate and compare the overall estrogen and androgen activating potential of PM10 air samples at an urban, rural and industrial location in Flanders, using a human in vitro cell bioassay. METHODS:PM10 samples were collected on glass fiber filters every six days between April 2013 and January 2014 using a high-volume sampler. Extraction was executed with a hexane/acetone mixture before analysis using a recombinant estrogen- or androgen responsive humancarcinoma cell line. Results were expressed as bioanalytical equivalents (BEQs) per cubic meter of air. RESULTS: High fluctuations in estrogenic activity were observed during the entire sampling period, with median BEQs of 32.1, 35.9 and 31.1 fg E2-Eq m(-)³ in the industrial, urban and rural background area, respectively. Estrogenic activity was measured in 70% of the samples, while no androgenic activity was observed in any of the samples. The estrogenic activity in the industrial area was positively correlated with the airborne concentration of the sum of the non-carcinogenic PAHs pyrene and fluoranthene (rho=0.48; p<0.01) and the sum of the carcinogenic PAHs (rho=0.36; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that no androgenic activity was present in PM10 and that although the median estrogenic activity was rather low and comparable in the three locations, high fluctuations in estrogenic response exist over time. While atmospheric PAHs contributed to the observed estrogenic response, especially in the industrial area, the chemicals responsible for the majority of estrogenic activity remain to be identified.
Authors: Sander C Van der Linden; Minne B Heringa; Hai-Yen Man; Edwin Sonneveld; Leo M Puijker; Abraham Brouwer; Bart Van der Burg Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Dalel Belhaj; Rim Baccar; Ikram Jaabiri; Jalel Bouzid; Moneem Kallel; Habib Ayadi; John L Zhou Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Camilla Liscio; Alaa Abdul-Sada; Raghad Al-Salhi; Michael H Ramsey; Elizabeth M Hill Journal: Water Res Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 11.236
Authors: M Elskens; D S Baston; C Stumpf; J Haedrich; I Keupers; K Croes; M S Denison; W Baeyens; L Goeyens Journal: Talanta Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 6.057
Authors: T Vandermarken; S De Galan; K Croes; K Van Langenhove; J Vercammen; H Sanctorum; M S Denison; L Goeyens; M Elskens; W Baeyens Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Kim Croes; Pieterjan Debaillie; Bo Van den Bril; Jeroen Staelens; Tara Vandermarken; Kersten Van Langenhove; Michael S Denison; Martine Leermakers; Marc Elskens Journal: Chemosphere Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 7.086
Authors: Emanuela Taioli; Radim J Sram; Seymour Garte; Ivan Kalina; Todor A Popov; Peter B Farmer Journal: Mutat Res Date: 2007-03-03 Impact factor: 2.433
Authors: Jana M Weiss; Timo Hamers; Kevin V Thomas; Sander van der Linden; Pim E G Leonards; Marja H Lamoree Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Thomas M Young; Gabrielle P Black; Luann Wong; Clayton S Bloszies; Oliver Fiehn; Guochun He; Michael S Denison; Christoph F A Vogel; Blythe Durbin-Johnson Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 9.028