Katherine A Collins1, Liezl B Fos1, Leanna M Ross1, Cris A Slentz1,2, Paul G Davis3, Leslie H Willis1, Lucy W Piner1, Lori A Bateman4, Joseph A Houmard5, William E Kraus1,2. 1. Duke University Medical Center, Duke Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, NC, United States. 2. Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States. 3. Department of Kinesiology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States. 4. Genomics and Informatics Center, Collaborative Studies Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States. 5. Department of Exercise and Sports Science and Human Performance Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to determine the differential effects of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), and a combination of aerobic and resistance training (AT/RT) on changes in self-rated HrQoL measures, including the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) survey and Satisfaction with Physical Function and Appearance survey. We also sought to determine if combination training (AT/RT) has a more or less additive effect compared to AT or RT alone on self-rated HrQoL measures. Materials and Methods: Participants (n = 137) completed one of three 8-month exercise interventions: (1) AT: 14 kcal exercise expenditure per kg of body weight per week (KKW; equivalent to roughly 12 miles/week) at 65-80% of peak oxygen consumption; (2) RT: 3 days per week, 8 exercises, 3 sets per exercise, 8-12 repetitions per set; (3) AT/RT: full combination of the AT and RT interventions. The SF-36 survey, Satisfaction with Physical Function and Appearance survey, physical fitness, and anthropometrics were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Paired t-tests determined significant pre- vs. post-intervention scores within groups (p < 0.05). Analyses of covariance determined differences in change scores among groups (p < 0.05). Results: On average, participants were 49.0 ± 10.6 years old, obese (BMI: 30.6 ± 3.2 kg/m2), female (57.7%), and Caucasian (84.7%). Following the 8-month intervention, exercise groups improved peak VO2 (all groups), strength (RT and AT/RT), and anthropometric measures (AT and AT/RT). For the SF-36, RT (p = 0.03) and AT/RT (p < 0.001) significantly improved their physical component score; only AT/RT (p < 0.001) significantly improved their mental component score. Notably, all groups significantly improved both their satisfaction with physical function and appearance scores (All Groups: p < 0.001 for both outcomes). Conclusions: We found that aerobic, resistance, or combination exercise training improves several components of self-rated HrQoL, including physical function, appearance, and mental well-being. Clinical Trial Registration: No. NCT00275145.
RCT Entities:
Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to determine the differential effects of aerobic training (AT), resistance training (RT), and a combination of aerobic and resistance training (AT/RT) on changes in self-rated HrQoL measures, including the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) survey and Satisfaction with Physical Function and Appearance survey. We also sought to determine if combination training (AT/RT) has a more or less additive effect compared to AT or RT alone on self-rated HrQoL measures. Materials and Methods:Participants (n = 137) completed one of three 8-month exercise interventions: (1) AT: 14 kcal exercise expenditure per kg of body weight per week (KKW; equivalent to roughly 12 miles/week) at 65-80% of peak oxygen consumption; (2) RT: 3 days per week, 8 exercises, 3 sets per exercise, 8-12 repetitions per set; (3) AT/RT: full combination of the AT and RT interventions. The SF-36 survey, Satisfaction with Physical Function and Appearance survey, physical fitness, and anthropometrics were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Paired t-tests determined significant pre- vs. post-intervention scores within groups (p < 0.05). Analyses of covariance determined differences in change scores among groups (p < 0.05). Results: On average, participants were 49.0 ± 10.6 years old, obese (BMI: 30.6 ± 3.2 kg/m2), female (57.7%), and Caucasian (84.7%). Following the 8-month intervention, exercise groups improved peak VO2 (all groups), strength (RT and AT/RT), and anthropometric measures (AT and AT/RT). For the SF-36, RT (p = 0.03) and AT/RT (p < 0.001) significantly improved their physical component score; only AT/RT (p < 0.001) significantly improved their mental component score. Notably, all groups significantly improved both their satisfaction with physical function and appearance scores (All Groups: p < 0.001 for both outcomes). Conclusions: We found that aerobic, resistance, or combination exercise training improves several components of self-rated HrQoL, including physical function, appearance, and mental well-being. Clinical Trial Registration: No. NCT00275145.
Authors: Kathryn J Reid; Kelly Glazer Baron; Brandon Lu; Erik Naylor; Lisa Wolfe; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Dirk Posthouwer; Iris Plug; Johanna G van der Bom; Kathelijn Fischer; Frits R Rosendaal; Eveline P Mauser-Bunschoten Journal: Haematologica Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Lori A Bateman; Cris A Slentz; Leslie H Willis; A Tamlyn Shields; Lucy W Piner; Connie W Bales; Joseph A Houmard; William E Kraus Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2011-07-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Kirk I Erickson; Charles Hillman; Chelsea M Stillman; Rachel M Ballard; Bonny Bloodgood; David E Conroy; Richard Macko; David X Marquez; Steven J Petruzzello; Kenneth E Powell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Elizabeth A Awick; Thomas R Wójcicki; Erin A Olson; Jason Fanning; Hyondo D Chung; Krystle Zuniga; Michael Mackenzie; Arthur F Kramer; Edward McAuley Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Karynne Grutter Lopes; Maria das Graças Coelho de Souza; Michelle da Costa Tavares Bezerra; Lucas Miranda Bessa; Paulo Farinatti; Eliete Bouskela; Miguel Madeira; Luiz Guilherme Kraemer-Aguiar Journal: Trials Date: 2022-09-02 Impact factor: 2.728