Literature DB >> 33644179

Successful bailout stenting strategy against rare spontaneous retrograde dissection of partially absorbed magnesium-based resorbable scaffold: A case report.

Zhen-Yu Liao1, Jer-Young Liou1, Shen-Chang Lin1, Huei-Fong Hung1, Che-Ming Chang1, Lung-Ching Chen1, Su-Kiat Chua1, Huey-Ming Lo1, Chi-Feng Hung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the development of coronary stent technology, bioresorbable scaffolds are promising milestones in improving the clinical treatment of coronary artery disease. The "leave nothing behind" motto is the premise of the fourth revolution in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Studies proving the safety and efficacy of the magnesium-based resorbable scaffolds (MgBRSs) include the BIOSOLVE-I and BIOSOLVE-II trials and the latest BIOSOLVE-IV registry. However, spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS may still occur, albeit rarely. CASE
SUMMARY: We describe an unusual case of coronary artery disease in a patient who had undergone a successful PCI 8 mo earlier, where an MgBRS was implanted into the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery with drug-coated balloons for a ramus intermedius branch stenosis to achieve the "leave nothing behind" therapeutic intention and was currently presenting with a gradual worsening of chest tightness. The distal edge vascular response, during subsequent attempts with balloon angioplasty was performed smoothly. However, spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS in the LAD ensued. Successful bailout stenting was performed with revascularization of the entry and exit sites created by spontaneous dissection and complete sealing of the intramural hematoma. The patient recovered well and was discharged after 2 d of intervention. When followed up in August 2020 (7 mo later), the patient showed uneventful recovery.
CONCLUSION: Spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS was successfully treated using bailout sirolimus-eluting coronary stent strategy. ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Coronary artery disease; Dissection; Magnesium; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stents

Year:  2021        PMID: 33644179      PMCID: PMC7896648          DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Cases        ISSN: 2307-8960            Impact factor:   1.337


Core Tip: Coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention primarily involves using balloon angioplasty and intracoronary stenting with either drug-eluting stents or bare metal stents. Other methods of improving coronary blood flow include atherectomy and radiation. Resorbable metallic scaffolds have been developed to reduce adverse events after permanent metallic stent placement, such as restenosis or stent thrombosis. These adverse events have been attributed to persistent inflammation, impaired vasomotion, ongoing tissue growth within the stent frame, and neoatherosclerosis. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is rare. Reverse dissection of post-magnesium-based resorbable scaffold stenting is even rarer.

INTRODUCTION

Currently, perpetual metallic stents are the most commonly used stents for percu-taneous myocardial re-vascularization[1] because they meet a broad range of technical and clinical demands, including exceptional deliverability, sufficient radial force on the vessel wall, uniform and adequate scaffolding, restriction of neointimal hyperplasia, decreased restenosis rate, and reduced occurrence of major cardiac adverse events[2]. Although the current generation of metallic stents, especially drug-eluting stents (DES), perform excellently, concerns about their long-term efficacy continue to pose a dilemma for interventional cardiologists[3]. Although magnesium-based resorbable scaffolds (MgBRSs) overcome many problems and obstacles, including permanent caging of the vessels and its sequelae, late stent thrombosis, eventful restenosis, and neoatherosclerosis may still occur. Many of these issues are due to the drug, polymer, or metallic platform left behind in the arterial wall[4].

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 45-year-old man was admitted to the cardiovascular department with complains of ongoing chest tightness, dyspnea, and left shoulder pain that had worsened over the preceding weeks.

History of present illness

The chest tightness progressed and worsened. The patient described it as a dull, non-spreading tightness over the retrosternal area. However, angina occurred more commonly in the morning. Each episode lasted a few minutes and usually subsided after taking a short rest. He experienced slight limitations in his daily activities.

History of past illness

The patient had a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, and he had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) eight months ago using a new MgBRSs over the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex artery. He was on several medications for many years, including angiotensin-receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, and HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors. He had no known history of allergies.

Personal and family history

He had a family history of coronary artery disease. He was also a chain smoker (20 cigarettes per day), with more than 20 years of smoking history before he quit smoking in 2018. He denied any illicit drug or alcohol use.

Physical examination

The patient’s body-mass index was approximately 29.7 (kg/m2), indicating obesity. His blood pressure was 120/79 mmHg with a regular heart rate of 72 beats per minute. Cardiac examination, including auscultation for carotid bruits, jugular venous pulse, heart sounds, and murmurs was normal.

Laboratory examinations

On admission, laboratory data, such as blood cell count, electrolytes, and biochemistry blood analysis, were within normal limits. A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed normal sinus rhythm with low voltage and borderline right axis deviation. Myocardial perfusion scans were previously performed to determine the extent and location of myocardial ischemia and revealed partial reversibility with notable ischemia at the apical segment.

Imaging examinations

Chest radiography showed normal cardiac size and configuration. Patients underwent post-implantation intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) evaluation during admission. The main OCT imaging findings were near total resorption of the MgBRS struts eight months after implantation without substantial vessel recoil, which could have been caused by early radial strength deficiency (Figure 1). A distal edge vascular response (EVR) was apparent (Figure 2A).
Figure 1

Intravascular ultrasound 8 mo prior, optical coherence tomography and coronary angiography findings. A-C: The treated segments are proximal cross-section (A), middle cross-section (B), distal cross-section (C). Post-implantation intravascular ultrasound images of the magnesium-based metal scaffolds show good apposition of struts. Real-time optical coherence tomography pullbacks vividly demonstrate almost complete resorption of the struts at the 8th month. MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; LAD: Left anterior descending artery.

Figure 2

Coronary angiography images. A: Edge vascular response adjacent to the distal edges after implantation of fully magnesium-based resorbable scaffold; B: Optimal balloon angioplasty; C: Coronary dissection occurs with rapid spreading out (in antero-cranial view).

Intravascular ultrasound 8 mo prior, optical coherence tomography and coronary angiography findings. A-C: The treated segments are proximal cross-section (A), middle cross-section (B), distal cross-section (C). Post-implantation intravascular ultrasound images of the magnesium-based metal scaffolds show good apposition of struts. Real-time optical coherence tomography pullbacks vividly demonstrate almost complete resorption of the struts at the 8th month. MRS: Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; LAD: Left anterior descending artery. Coronary angiography images. A: Edge vascular response adjacent to the distal edges after implantation of fully magnesium-based resorbable scaffold; B: Optimal balloon angioplasty; C: Coronary dissection occurs with rapid spreading out (in antero-cranial view).

Further imaging work-up

For distal EVR (Figure 2A), the patient underwent coronary angiography following balloon angioplasty (Figure 2B), which led to type B dissections in the partially absorbed MgBRS of the LAD. Coronary angiography revealed localized parallel strips and a double lumen separated by a radiolucent area during dye injection with obvious residual enhancement after imaging contrast clearance (Figure 2C).

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The final diagnosis was spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS.

TREATMENT

A 6F EBU SH guiding catheter (Cordis Corporation, Miami Lakes, FL, United States) was uneventfully inserted into the left coronary artery via the patient’s right radial artery. Workhorse guidewires are usually used during this procedure, including the RUNTHROUGH NS Extra Floppy (Terumo Medical Corporation, Somerset, NJ, United States). Subsequent bailout stenting was accomplished with revascularization of entry and exit sites created by spontaneous dissection and by complete sealing of the intramural hematoma (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Optical coherence tomography images. A: Proximal cross-section; B: Middle cross-section; C: Distal cross-section. Optical coherence tomography results are consistent with the estimates of the prior image study and showed good apposition struts.

Optical coherence tomography images. A: Proximal cross-section; B: Middle cross-section; C: Distal cross-section. Optical coherence tomography results are consistent with the estimates of the prior image study and showed good apposition struts. Following validation of possible complications associated with spontaneous dissection and final LAD coronary flow status, all rescue strategies and treatments were successful (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Coronary angiography images. Image of percutaneous coronary intervention reveals satisfactory outcomes in the antero-cranial view.

Coronary angiography images. Image of percutaneous coronary intervention reveals satisfactory outcomes in the antero-cranial view.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

After the intervention treatment, oppressive retrosternal chest discomfort during procedure subsided. Mild myocardial damage was observed (Max Troponin I: 10.5093 ng/mL) without ST segment elevation in electrocardiogram interpretation, and myocardial contractility was well preserved (left ventricular ejection fraction: 74%). The patient was closely followed-up for 10 mo in the cardiovascular outpatient department with cardiac rehabilitation, and follow-up period was uneventful.

DISCUSSION

This is the first case report of a rare spontaneous dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS, successfully treated with bailout drug-eluting intracoronary stenting. PCI is a safe and effective procedure used to improve blood flow through the coronary circulation. Procedures that improve coronary revascularization, including atherectomy and radiation, involve the use of balloon angioplasty and intracoronary stenting with DES, bare metal stents, or resorbable scaffolds (BRS)[5]. Patients with long life expectancies and simple coronary artery disease benefit more from bioresorbable scaffold technology that provides short duration vessel support (12 mo) and a drug-delivery effect, compared to DES from permanent metallic stents that pose long-term limitations[6]. Our real-world experience includes 21 consecutive subjects who underwent PCI with MgBRS at the Cardiology Department of Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital between May 2019 and August 2020. Data were collected from clinical and PCI records, which included demographic characteristics, PCI details, medical history, and in-hospital complications (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients

Baseline characteristics
n (%)
Age (mean ± SD)58.14 ± 8.60
Male19 (90.5)
Hypertension17 (81.0)
Hyperlipidemia17 (81.0)
Smoking4 (19.0)
Diabetes mellitus7 (33.3)
Insulin dependent0 (0)
Non-insulin dependent7 (33.3)
History of MI0 (0)
Previous percutaneous intervention4 (19.0)
NSTEMI0 (0)

SD: Standard deviation; MI: Myocardial infarction; NSTEMI: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Baseline characteristics of patients SD: Standard deviation; MI: Myocardial infarction; NSTEMI: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Most of our patients were men, with ages ranging from 43 to 70 years. The rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus were 81%, 81%, and 33.3%, respectively. None of the patients had anemia or chronic kidney disease. We adhered to the implantation guidelines, including selection of de novo lesions, quantitative coronary angiography, IVUS, and/or OCT for quantitative lesion evaluation, oriented lesion preparation using cutting balloon or scoring technologies, and image-guided implantation with non-compliant balloon post-dilatation[7]. Furthermore, we also avoided MgBRS implantation with special coronary artery geometries, including left main lesions, ostial lesions, and lesions with heavy calcification, tortuosity or angulation, and diffuse long coronary arteries[8]. OCT provides a significantly superior resolution that allows precise evaluation of apposition struts, resorption, and relevant vessel wall pathology. Patients underwent post-procedural OCT or IVUS evaluation, a planned angiographic and OCT follow-up at 6 and 12 mo, if available, and scheduled clinical assessments. Double anti-platelet therapy was mandatory for at least 12 mo. In the first-generation BRS era, the ABSORB Cohort B study used serial OCT imaging to examine the EVR and its relationship with in-scaffold vascular response (SVR) after Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Abbott Vascular) implantation with a 3-year follow-up period[9]. In a previous study, Zhang et al[10] assumed that the geometric modification at the edges of the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (Abbott Vascular) was not a separate pathological occurrence, but just an extension of the changes in luminal dimension revealed at the margins of the in-scaffold[10-12]. The Magmaris EVR invasive imaging analysis in the Biosolve-II trial (123 patients) sub-study was a single-arm, prospective, multi-center study that included 20 patients. In the proximal and distal EVR assessments, segment- and frame-level analysis of the 5 mm segments proximal and distal to the actual MgBRS revealed that there were no meaningful changes in intracoronary imaging, including OCT, grayscale IVUS, and virtual histology IVUS[13]. The types of coronary artery dissection, according to the NHLBI classification system, include type A and B, which are clinically benign, whereas types C-F may lead to catastrophic clinical events unless they are promptly and safely treated. Laceration of the coronary endothelium and rupture of the vasa vasorum are possible pathological mechanisms that may explain the spontaneous separation of the layers of the vascular wall[14]. Side effects of the degradation products from MgBRSs are not expected since magnesium plays a key role in many biological systems. However, no data are available regarding the possible consequences of a rare spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS. In the absence of evidence-based randomized trials to analyze the outcomes of different strategies, the optimal treatment for spontaneous coronary artery dissection remains unknown. Several recent strategies have refined the outcome of spontaneous coronary artery dissection, including traditional DESs, BRSs, and drug eluting balloons[15]. Similarly, due to the lack of conventional data, expert consensus has recommended the use of biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (Orsiro; Biotronik, Bulach, Switzerland) because its coating does not interfere with the residual magnesium alloy.

CONCLUSION

To achieve the therapeutic intention of “leave nothing behind” BRSs have been materialized to conquer the limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents. We reported a rare case, the first in Taiwan, which demonstrated successful treatment of rare spontaneous retrograde dissection of a partially absorbed MgBRS with bailout stenting of the SES. This rare case report provides new information on MgBRS gathered from precious clinical experience, review of current data, anticipation, advice, and recommendations for interventional cardiologist. It also hints the possible future perspectives on MgBRS.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate the expert comments of the reviewers and editors and the contacts they shared. We also thank for the Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital (108-SKH-FJU-02) in Taiwan.
  15 in total

1.  [2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)].

Authors:  Franz-Josef Neumann; Miguel Sousa-Uva; Anders Ahlsson; Fernando Alfonso; Adrian P Banning; Umberto Benedetto; Robert A Byrne; Jean-Philippe Collet; Volkmar Falk; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; Akos Koller; Steen D Kristensen; Josef Niebauer; Dimitrios J Richter; Petar M Seferovic'; Dirk Sibbing; Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker; Rashmi Yadav; Michael O Zembala
Journal:  G Ital Cardiol (Rome)       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug

2.  The edge vascular response following implantation of the Absorb everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the XIENCE V metallic everolimus-eluting stent. First serial follow-up assessment at six months and two years: insights from the first-in-man ABSORB Cohort B and SPIRIT II trials.

Authors:  Bill D Gogas; Christos V Bourantas; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Yoshinobu Onuma; Takashi Muramatsu; Vasim Farooq; Roberto Diletti; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Bernard De Bruyne; Bernard Chevalier; Leif Thuesen; Pieter C Smits; Dariusz Dudek; Jacques Koolen; Stefan Windecker; Robert Whitbourn; Dougal McClean; Cecile Dorange; Karine Miquel-Hebert; Susan Veldhof; Richard Rapoza; John A Ormiston; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Magnesium 2000 postmarket evaluation: Guideline adherence and intraprocedural performance of a sirolimus-eluting resorbable magnesium scaffold.

Authors:  Adrian Wlodarczak; Luis Antonio Iñigo Garcia; Pasi P Karjalainen; András Komócsi; Francesco Pisano; Stephan Richter; Magdalena Lanocha; Jose Ramón Rumoroso; Kwok Fai Leung
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-02-10

Review 4.  New generation bioresorbable scaffold technologies: an update on novel devices and clinical results.

Authors:  Damiano Regazzoli; Pier Pasquale Leone; Antonio Colombo; Azeem Latib
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  First Report of Edge Vascular Response at 12 Months of Magmaris, A Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold, Assessed by Grayscale Intravascular Ultrasound, Virtual Histology, and Optical Coherence Tomography. A Biosolve-II Trial Sub-Study.

Authors:  Alexandre Hideo-Kajita; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Michael Haude; Michael Joner; Jacques Koolen; Hüseyin Ince; Alexandre Abizaid; Ralph Toelg; Pedro A Lemos; Clemens von Birgelen; Evald Høj Christiansen; William Wijns; Franz-Josef Neumann; Christoph Kaiser; Eric Eeckhout; Lim Soo Teik; Javier Escaned; Viana Azizi; Kayode O Kuku; Yuichi Ozaki; Kazuhiro Dan; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 6.  Magmaris: a new generation metallic sirolimus-eluting fully bioresorbable scaffold: present status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio Rapetto; Massimo Leoncini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Scaffold and edge vascular response following implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold: a 3-year serial optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Yao-Jun Zhang; Javaid Iqbal; Shimpei Nakatani; Christos V Bourantas; Carlos M Campos; Yuki Ishibashi; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Susan Veldhof; Jin Wang; Yoshinobu Onuma; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Dariusz Dudek; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Comparison of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting coronary stents: final 5-year report of the RESOLUTE all-comers trial.

Authors:  Javaid Iqbal; Patrick W Serruys; Sigmund Silber; Henning Kelbaek; Gert Richardt; Marie-Angele Morel; Manuela Negoita; Pawel E Buszman; Stephan Windecker
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 9.  Coronary Stents: History, Design, and Construction.

Authors:  Torrey Schmidt; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Technology and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Brian Forrestal; Brian C Case; Charan Yerasi; Anees Musallam; Chava Chezar-Azerrad; Ron Waksman
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2020-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.