Literature DB >> 21958884

Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes.

Patrick W Serruys1, Yoshinobu Onuma, Dariusz Dudek, Pieter C Smits, Jacques Koolen, Bernard Chevalier, Bernard de Bruyne, Leif Thuesen, Dougal McClean, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Stephan Windecker, Robert Whitbourn, Ian Meredith, Cecile Dorange, Susan Veldhof, Karine Miquel Hebert, Krishnankutty Sudhir, Hector M Garcia-Garcia, John A Ormiston.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the prevention of early scaffold area shrinkage of the ABSORB BVS (Rev.1.1, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California) was sustained and not simply delayed by a few months.
BACKGROUND: With improved scaffold design and modified manufacturing process of its polymer, the second iteration of ABSORB (BVS 1.1) has improved performance to prevent a scaffold area reduction at 6 months.
METHODS: Fifty-six patients were enrolled and received 57 ABSORB scaffolds. Quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), analysis of radiofrequency backscattering, echogenicity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed at baseline and at 12-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall the scaffold area remained unchanged with IVUS as well as with OCT, whereas the radiofrequency backscattering and the echogenicity of the struts decreased by 16.8% (p < 0.001) and 20% (p < 0.001), respectively; more specifically, the strut core area on OCT decreased by 11.4% (p = 0.003). Despite the absence of scaffold area loss, pharmacological vasomotion was restored. On an intention-to-treat basis, the angiographic late lumen loss amounted to 0.27 ± 0.32 mm with an IVUS relative decrease in minimal lumen area of 1.94% (p = 0.12), without significant changes in mean lumen area. The OCT at follow-up showed that 96.69% of the struts were covered and that malapposition, initially observed in 18 scaffolds was only detected at follow-up in 4 scaffolds. Two patients experienced peri-procedural and iatrogenic myocardial infarction, respectively, whereas 2 underwent repeat intervention, resulting in the major adverse cardiac event rate of 7.1% (4 of 56).
CONCLUSIONS: The 12-month performance of the second-generation ABSORB bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold justifies the conduct of a randomized trial against current best standards. (A Clinical Evaluation of the Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System [BVS EECSS] in the Treatment of Patients With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions; NCT00856856).
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958884     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  67 in total

1.  Poly-l-lactic acid/amorphous calcium phosphate bioabsorbable stent causes less inflammation than poly-l-lactic acid stent in coronary arteries.

Authors:  Lingting Kong; Wenbo Liu; Ge Yan; Qiang Li; Haiyan Yang; Fengxia Yu; Haoming Song
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-12-15

2.  Implications of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation on vessel wall strain of the treated and the adjacent segments.

Authors:  Christos V Bourantas; Hector M Garcia-Garcia; Carlos A M Campos; Yao-Jun Zhang; Takashi Muramatsu; Marie-Angèle Morel; Shimpei Nakatani; Xingyu Gao; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Yuki Isibashi; Frank J H Gijsen; Yoshinobu Onuma; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Fusion of optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data for more accurate evaluation of the endothelial shear stress patterns and neointimal distribution after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: comparison with intravascular ultrasound-derived reconstructions.

Authors:  Christos V Bourantas; Michail I Papafaklis; Lampros Lakkas; Antonis Sakellarios; Yoshinobu Onuma; Yao-Jun Zhang; Takashi Muramatsu; Roberto Diletti; Paschalis Bizopoulos; Fanis Kalatzis; Katerina K Naka; Dimitrios I Fotiadis; Jin Wang; Hector M Garcia Garcia; Takeshi Kimura; Lampros K Michalis; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Subacute bioresorbable vascular scaffold thrombosis: a report of 2 cases.

Authors:  Hee Hwa Ho; Min Er Ching; Paul Jau Lueng Ong; Yau Wei Ooi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  Causes, assessment, and treatment of stent thrombosis--intravascular imaging insights.

Authors:  Daniel S Ong; Ik-Kyung Jang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Challenging treatment of in-stent restenosis in a coronary bifurcation by implantation of a bioresorbable scaffold under optical coherence tomography guidance.

Authors:  Grzegorz Zuk; Dariusz Ciecwierz; Piotr Drewla; Marcin Gruchała; Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Milosz Jaguszewski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.737

7.  Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in coronary chronic total occlusions revascularization: safety assessment related to struts coverage and apposition in 6-month OCT follow-up.

Authors:  Rosa Alba Abellas-Sequeiros; Raymundo Ocaranza-Sanchez; Ramiro Trillo-Nouche; Carlos Gonzalez-Juanatey; Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 8.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Current Evidences in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Bhargav Dave
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

Review 9.  A review of bioresorbable scaffolds: hype or hope?

Authors:  Huay Cheem Tan; Rajiv Ananthakrishna
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.858

10.  Procedural findings and early healing response after implantation of a self-apposing bioresorbable scaffold in coronary bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Emil Nielsen Holck; Camilla Fox-Maule; Trine Ørhøj Barkholt; Lars Jakobsen; Shengxian Tu; Michael Maeng; Jouke Dijkstra; Evald Høj Christiansen; Niels Ramsing Holm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.