Literature DB >> 33643907

Prognostic Nomogram for Sorafenib Benefit in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Partial Hepatectomy.

Wei Dong1,2, Kai Yan3, Hua Yu1,2, Lei Huo4, Zhihong Xian1,2, Yanqing Zhao1,2, Jutang Li5, Yuchan Zhang1,2, Zhenying Cao1,2, Yong Fu3, Wenming Cong1,2, Hui Dong1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predicting the long-term prognosis of individuals who experienced sorafenib treatment following partial hepatectomy due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is difficult. This work aims to create an effective prognostic nomogram for HBV related HCC patients who are receiving sorafenib treatment as adjuvant therapy after surgery.
METHODS: A total of 233 HBV-related HCC patients treated with or without sorafenib following partial hepatectomy at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital from 2008 to 2013 were matched with propensity score matching analysis. The optimal cut-off point of the overall survival (OS) factor level was determined by x-tile. The selection of indicators was based on clinical findings. The Cox regression model with an interaction term was employed for evaluating the predictive value. Using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, a nomogram was subsequently formulated to analyze 111 patients treated with sorafenib. The nomogram's discriminative ability and predictive accuracy were determined using the concordance index (C-index), calibration, and ROC curve.
RESULTS: The matched sorafenib cohort of 111 patients and control cohort of 118 patients were analyzed. Subgroup analysis revealed that low GPC3, pERK, pAKT, serum AFP levels, without MVI, under 50 years old, male, TNM stage I/II and BCLC stage 0/A were significantly associated with a better OS in patients subjected to sorafenib treatment compared to those without sorafenib treatment after surgery. Multivariate analysis of the sorafenib cohort revealed GPC3, pERK, pAKT, serum AST, and BCLC stage as independent factors for OS, and all were included in the nomogram. The survival probability based on the calibration curve showed that the prediction of the nomogram was in good agreement with the actual observation. The C-index of the nomogram for predicting survival was 0.73(95% CI, 0.67-0.78). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the nomogram to predict the survival for 1, 3, and 5-year was 0.726, 0.816, and 0.823, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This proposed nomogram shows the potential to make a precise prediction regarding the prognosis of HBV-related HCC patients and may help to stratify patients for personalized therapy following partial hepatectomy.
Copyright © 2021 Dong, Yan, Yu, Huo, Xian, Zhao, Li, Zhang, Cao, Fu, Cong and Dong.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hepatitis B virus; hepatocellular carcinoma; nomogram; partial hepatectomy; personalized therapy; prognosis; sorafenib

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643907      PMCID: PMC7906076          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.605057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  60 in total

1.  Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: which staging systems best predict prognosis?

Authors:  Fidel-David Huitzil-Melendez; Marinela Capanu; Eileen M O'Reilly; Austin Duffy; Bolorsukh Gansukh; Leonard L Saltz; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for intrahepatic recurrence.

Authors:  Giorgio Ercolani; Gian Luca Grazi; Matteo Ravaioli; Massimo Del Gaudio; Andrea Gardini; Matteo Cescon; Giovanni Varotti; Francesco Cetta; Antonino Cavallari
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 25.083

4.  FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tokuzo Arao; Kazuomi Ueshima; Kazuko Matsumoto; Tomoyuki Nagai; Hideharu Kimura; Satoru Hagiwara; Toshiharu Sakurai; Seiji Haji; Akishige Kanazawa; Hisashi Hidaka; Yukihiro Iso; Keiichi Kubota; Mitsuo Shimada; Tohru Utsunomiya; Masashi Hirooka; Yoichi Hiasa; Yoshikazu Toyoki; Kenichi Hakamada; Kohichiroh Yasui; Takashi Kumada; Hidenori Toyoda; Shuichi Sato; Hiroyuki Hisai; Teiji Kuzuya; Kaoru Tsuchiya; Namiki Izumi; Shigeki Arii; Kazuto Nishio; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  William G Wierda; Susan O'Brien; Xuemei Wang; Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Kim-Anh Do; Jorge Cortes; Deborah Thomas; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Charles Koller; Miloslav Beran; Francis Giles; Farhad Ravandi; Susan Lerner; Hagop Kantarjian; Michael Keating
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Preclinical overview of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that targets both Raf and VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.

Authors:  Scott M Wilhelm; Lila Adnane; Philippa Newell; Augusto Villanueva; Josep M Llovet; Mark Lynch
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth.

Authors:  Russell G Jones; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Mechanisms of resistance to sorafenib and the corresponding strategies in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Bo Zhai; Xue-Ying Sun
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2013-07-27

9.  Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Galectin-1 induces hepatocellular carcinoma EMT and sorafenib resistance by activating FAK/PI3K/AKT signaling.

Authors:  P-F Zhang; K-S Li; Y-H Shen; P-T Gao; Z-R Dong; J-B Cai; C Zhang; X-Y Huang; M-X Tian; Z-Q Hu; D-M Gao; J Fan; A-W Ke; G-M Shi
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 8.469

View more
  3 in total

1.  VWCE as a potential biomarker associated with immune infiltrates in breast cancer.

Authors:  Qin Huo; Zhenwei Li; Siqi Chen; Juan Wang; Jiaying Li; Ni Xie
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  A Promising Preoperative Prediction Model for Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on an Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm.

Authors:  Weiwei Liu; Lifan Zhang; Zhaodan Xin; Haili Zhang; Liting You; Ling Bai; Juan Zhou; Binwu Ying
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Multicentre Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Kongying Lin; Fuqun Wei; Qizhen Huang; Zisen Lai; Jinyu Zhang; Qingjing Chen; Yabin Jiang; Jie Kong; Shichuan Tang; Jianhuai Lin; Yufeng Chen; Jinhong Chen; Yongyi Zeng
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-03-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.