Literature DB >> 22890726

FGF3/FGF4 amplification and multiple lung metastases in responders to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Tokuzo Arao1, Kazuomi Ueshima, Kazuko Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nagai, Hideharu Kimura, Satoru Hagiwara, Toshiharu Sakurai, Seiji Haji, Akishige Kanazawa, Hisashi Hidaka, Yukihiro Iso, Keiichi Kubota, Mitsuo Shimada, Tohru Utsunomiya, Masashi Hirooka, Yoichi Hiasa, Yoshikazu Toyoki, Kenichi Hakamada, Kohichiroh Yasui, Takashi Kumada, Hidenori Toyoda, Shuichi Sato, Hiroyuki Hisai, Teiji Kuzuya, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Namiki Izumi, Shigeki Arii, Kazuto Nishio, Masatoshi Kudo.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The response rate to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is relatively low (0.7%-3%), however, rapid and drastic tumor regression is occasionally observed. The molecular backgrounds and clinico-pathological features of these responders remain largely unclear. We analyzed the clinical and molecular backgrounds of 13 responders to sorafenib with significant tumor shrinkage in a retrospective study. A comparative genomic hybridization analysis using one frozen HCC sample from a responder demonstrated that the 11q13 region, a rare amplicon in HCC including the loci for FGF3 and FGF4, was highly amplified. A real-time polymerase chain reaction-based copy number assay revealed that FGF3/FGF4 amplification was observed in three of the 10 HCC samples from responders in which DNA was evaluable, whereas amplification was not observed in 38 patients with stable or progressive disease (P = 0.006). Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed FGF3 amplification. In addition, the clinico-pathological features showed that multiple lung metastases (5/13, P = 0.006) and a poorly differentiated histological type (5/13, P = 0.13) were frequently observed in responders. A growth inhibitory assay showed that only one FGF3/FGF4-amplified and three FGFR2-amplified cancer cell lines exhibited hypersensitivity to sorafenib in vitro. Finally, an in vivo study revealed that treatment with a low dose of sorafenib was partially effective for stably and exogenously expressed FGF4 tumors, while being less effective in tumors expressing EGFP or FGF3.
CONCLUSION: FGF3/FGF4 amplification was observed in around 2% of HCCs. Although the sample size was relatively small, FGF3/FGF4 amplification, a poorly differentiated histological type, and multiple lung metastases were frequently observed in responders to sorafenib. Our findings may provide a novel insight into the molecular background of HCC and sorafenib responders, warranting further prospective biomarker studies.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22890726     DOI: 10.1002/hep.25956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  57 in total

1.  Biomarkers and Personalized Sorafenib Therapy.

Authors:  M Kudo
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 2.  Chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the sorafenib age.

Authors:  Koji Miyahara; Kazuhiro Nouso; Kazuhide Yamamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Personalized Clinical Trials in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Biomarker Selection.

Authors:  Bingnan Zhang; Richard S Finn
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 11.740

4.  Validation of ORAOV1 as a new treatment target in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang Yun Ha; So-Young Yeo; Keun-Woo Lee; Seok-Hyung Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Integrated Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC) and Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation (iTRAQ) Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Identifies Galectin-1 as a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Sorafenib Resistance in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Chao-Chi Yeh; Chih-Hung Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao; Wen-Ching Ho; Mong-Hsun Tsai; Wen-Chi Feng; Lu-Ping Chow
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Predictive biomarkers of sorafenib efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Are we getting there?

Authors:  Yu-Yun Shao; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Prediction of Response to Sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Putative Marker Panel by Multiple Reaction Monitoring-Mass Spectrometry (MRM-MS).

Authors:  Hyunsoo Kim; Su Jong Yu; Injun Yeo; Young Youn Cho; Dong Hyeon Lee; Yuri Cho; Eun Ju Cho; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Yoon Jun Kim; Sungyoung Lee; Jongsoo Jun; Taesung Park; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Youngsoo Kim
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Biological features and biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Chiba; Eiichiro Suzuki; Tomoko Saito; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Yoshihiko Ooka; Akinobu Tawada; Atsushi Iwama; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-08

9.  Predicting responsiveness to sorafenib: can the determination of FGF3/FGF4 amplifications enrich for clinical benefit?

Authors:  James J Harding; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.293

10.  Complete pathological response induced by sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple lung metastases and venous tumor thrombosis allowing for curative resection.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Etsuro Hatano; Yusuke Mitsunori; Kojiro Taura; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Masaki Mizumoto; Hideaki Okajima; Toshimi Kaido; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.