Literature DB >> 33643391

An Improved Genome-Wide Polygenic Score Model for Predicting the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes.

Wei Liu1, Zhenhuang Zhuang2, Wenxiu Wang2, Tao Huang2,3,4, Zhonghua Liu1.   

Abstract

Polygenic risk score (PRS) has been shown to be predictive of disease risk such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the existing studies on genetic prediction for T2D only had limited predictive power. To further improve the predictive capability of the PRS model in identifying individuals at high T2D risk, we proposed a new three-step filtering procedure, which aimed to include truly predictive single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and avoid unpredictive ones into PRS model. First, we filtered SNPs according to the marginal association p-values (p≤ 5× 10-2) from large-scale genome-wide association studies. Second, we set linkage disequilibrium (LD) pruning thresholds (r 2) as 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8. Third, we set p-value thresholds as 5× 10-2, 5× 10-4, 5× 10-6, and 5× 10-8. Then, we constructed and tested multiple candidate PRS models obtained by the PRSice-2 software among 182,422 individuals in the UK Biobank (UKB) testing dataset. We validated the predictive capability of the optimal PRS model that was chosen from the testing process in identifying individuals at high T2D risk based on the UKB validation dataset (n = 274,029). The prediction accuracy of the PRS model evaluated by the adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) showed that our PRS model had good prediction performance [AUC = 0.795, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.790, 0.800)]. Specifically, our PRS model identified 30, 12, and 7% of the population at greater than five-, six-, and seven-fold risk for T2D, respectively. After adjusting for sex, age, physical measurements, and clinical factors, the AUC increased to 0.901 [95% CI: (0.897, 0.904)]. Therefore, our PRS model could be useful for population-level preventive T2D screening.
Copyright © 2021 Liu, Zhuang, Wang, Huang and Liu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UK Biobank; polygenic risk score; prediction model; screening; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643391      PMCID: PMC7905203          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.632385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


  29 in total

Review 1.  Genomics, type 2 diabetes, and obesity.

Authors:  Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Genetics of type 2 diabetes: pathophysiologic and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Christian Herder; Michael Roden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 4.686

3.  Making the Most of Clumping and Thresholding for Polygenic Scores.

Authors:  Florian Privé; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Hugues Aschard; Michael G B Blum
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 4.  10 Years of GWAS Discovery: Biology, Function, and Translation.

Authors:  Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray; Qian Zhang; Pamela Sklar; Mark I McCarthy; Matthew A Brown; Jian Yang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes in Finns detects multiple susceptibility variants.

Authors:  Laura J Scott; Karen L Mohlke; Lori L Bonnycastle; Cristen J Willer; Yun Li; William L Duren; Michael R Erdos; Heather M Stringham; Peter S Chines; Anne U Jackson; Ludmila Prokunina-Olsson; Chia-Jen Ding; Amy J Swift; Narisu Narisu; Tianle Hu; Randall Pruim; Rui Xiao; Xiao-Yi Li; Karen N Conneely; Nancy L Riebow; Andrew G Sprau; Maurine Tong; Peggy P White; Kurt N Hetrick; Michael W Barnhart; Craig W Bark; Janet L Goldstein; Lee Watkins; Fang Xiang; Jouko Saramies; Thomas A Buchanan; Richard M Watanabe; Timo T Valle; Leena Kinnunen; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Elizabeth W Pugh; Kimberly F Doheny; Richard N Bergman; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Francis S Collins; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Projecting the performance of risk prediction based on polygenic analyses of genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Nilanjan Chatterjee; Bill Wheeler; Joshua Sampson; Patricia Hartge; Stephen J Chanock; Ju-Hyun Park
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Polygenic type 2 diabetes prediction at the limit of common variant detection.

Authors:  Jason L Vassy; Marie-France Hivert; Bianca Porneala; Marco Dauriz; Jose C Florez; Josée Dupuis; David S Siscovick; Myriam Fornage; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Claude Bouchard; James B Meigs
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 9.337

10.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.

Authors:  Clare Bycroft; Colin Freeman; Desislava Petkova; Gavin Band; Lloyd T Elliott; Kevin Sharp; Allan Motyer; Damjan Vukcevic; Olivier Delaneau; Jared O'Connell; Adrian Cortes; Samantha Welsh; Alan Young; Mark Effingham; Gil McVean; Stephen Leslie; Naomi Allen; Peter Donnelly; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  3 in total

1.  Polygenic risk scores of endo-phenotypes identify the effect of genetic background in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sarah J Spendlove; Leroy Bondhus; Gentian Lluri; Jae Hoon Sul; Valerie A Arboleda
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 2.  Overview of Transcriptomic Research on Type 2 Diabetes: Challenges and Perspectives.

Authors:  Ziravard N Tonyan; Yulia A Nasykhova; Maria M Danilova; Yury A Barbitoff; Anton I Changalidi; Anastasiia A Mikhailova; Andrey S Glotov
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Body Mass Index and Birth Weight Improve Polygenic Risk Score for Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Avigail Moldovan; Yedael Y Waldman; Nadav Brandes; Michal Linial
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-06-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.