Literature DB >> 33643256

The Type and Concentration of Inoculum and Substrate as Well as the Presence of Oxygen Impact the Water Kefir Fermentation Process.

David Laureys1, Frédéric Leroy1, Tom Hauffman2, Marc Raes2, Maarten Aerts3, Peter Vandamme3, Luc De Vuyst1.   

Abstract

Eleven series of water kefir fermentation processes differing in the presence of oxygen and the type and concentration of inoculum and substrate, were followed as a function of time to quantify the impact of these parameters on the kinetics of this process via a modeling approach. Increasing concentrations of the water kefir grain inoculum increased the water kefir fermentation rate, so that the metabolic activity during water kefir fermentation was mainly associated with the grains. Water kefir liquor could also be used as an alternative means of inoculation, but the resulting fermentation process progressed slower than the one inoculated with water kefir grains, and the production of water kefir grain mass was absent. Substitution of sucrose with glucose and/or fructose reduced the water kefir grain growth, whereby glucose was fermented faster than fructose. Lacticaseibacillus paracasei (formerly known as Lactobacillus paracasei), Lentilactobacillus hilgardii (formerly known as Lactobacillus hilgardii), Liquorilactobacillus nagelii (formerly known as Lactobacillus nagelii), Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Dekkera bruxellensis were the main microorganisms present. Acetic acid bacteria were present in low abundances under anaerobic conditions and only proliferated under aerobic conditions. Visualization of the water kefir grains through scanning electron microscopy revealed that the majority of the microorganisms was attached onto their surface. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts were predominantly associated with the grains, whereas acetic acid bacteria were predominantly associated with the liquor.
Copyright © 2021 Laureys, Leroy, Hauffman, Raes, Aerts, Vandamme and De Vuyst.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inoculum; kinetics; modeling; oxygen; substrate; water kefir

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643256      PMCID: PMC7904701          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


  22 in total

1.  Effects of cow's and goat's milk as fermentation media on the microbial ecology of sugary kefir grains.

Authors:  Hsin-Hui Hsieh; Sheng-Yao Wang; Tzu-Li Chen; Yen-Lin Huang; Ming-Ju Chen
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 5.277

2.  Investigation of the instability and low water kefir grain growth during an industrial water kefir fermentation process.

Authors:  David Laureys; Amandine Van Jean; Jean Dumont; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Spoilage of bottled red wine by acetic acid bacteria.

Authors:  E J Bartowsky; D Xia; R L Gibson; G H Fleet; P A Henschke
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.858

4.  Sequence-based analysis of the microbial composition of water kefir from multiple sources.

Authors:  Alan J Marsh; Orla O'Sullivan; Colin Hill; R Paul Ross; Paul D Cotter
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Oxygen and diverse nutrients influence the water kefir fermentation process.

Authors:  David Laureys; Maarten Aerts; Peter Vandamme; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.516

6.  Bifidobacterium aquikefiri sp. nov., isolated from water kefir.

Authors:  David Laureys; Margo Cnockaert; Luc De Vuyst; Peter Vandamme
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  Genomic and physiological insights into the lifestyle of Bifidobacterium species from water kefir.

Authors:  Viktor P L Eckel; Rudi F Vogel
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.552

8.  Microbial species diversity, community dynamics, and metabolite kinetics of water kefir fermentation.

Authors:  David Laureys; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Fructophilic lactic acid bacteria inhabit fructose-rich niches in nature.

Authors:  Akihito Endo
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2012-06-18

10.  Shotgun Metagenomics of a Water Kefir Fermentation Ecosystem Reveals a Novel Oenococcus Species.

Authors:  Marko Verce; Luc De Vuyst; Stefan Weckx
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  3 in total

1.  Microorganisms in Whole Botanical Fermented Foods Survive Processing and Simulated Digestion to Affect Gut Microbiota Composition.

Authors:  Miin Chan; Di Liu; Yingying Wu; Fan Yang; Kate Howell
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 5.640

2.  Backslopping Time, Rinsing of the Grains During Backslopping, and Incubation Temperature Influence the Water Kefir Fermentation Process.

Authors:  David Laureys; Frédéric Leroy; Peter Vandamme; Luc De Vuyst
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Tradition as a Stepping Stone for a Microbial Defined Water Kefir Fermentation Process: Insights in Cell Growth, Bioflavoring, and Sensory Perception.

Authors:  Sarah Köhler; Maximilian Schmacht; Aktino H L Troubounis; Marie Ludszuweit; Nils Rettberg; Martin Senz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.