Literature DB >> 33643126

Development and Validation of the Purity Orientation-Pollution Avoidance Scale: A Study With Japanese Sample.

Hideya Kitamura1, Akiko Matsuo2.   

Abstract

The moral foundations theory (MFT) proposes that there are five moral foundations that work as the standard to make moral judgments. Among them, the purity foundation is a complex concept. It is considered to be a distinctive foundation compared with the other ones partly because it involves religious beliefs. The assumption underlying the purity foundation is Christian beliefs, so the MFT was developed and made prevalent mostly in the Western cultures. However, because of that assumption, cultural differences in perceiving the purity foundation should be observed with a non-Western sample, such as Japan. It would be important to discuss and clarify the Japanese unique aspect of their orientation toward the pure and impure. We constituted a scale to measure people's tendency toward purity orientation-pollution avoidance (POPA), based on the purity/sanctity subscale of the MFT. For validation, we administered several scales along with POPA. In Study 1, we developed the scale and measured the relationship between the degree of one's POPA, disgust, and animism. We identified four factors as POPA subscales. In Study 2, we investigated the test-retest reliability of POPA and conducted questionnaire surveys to measure attitudes toward paranormal phenomena and the degree of concern for each of the moral foundations. The results showed the validity of the scale, based on the moderate correlations with other scales. The POPA can be a promising tool to better understand the phenomena involving the purity foundation in a Japanese context.
Copyright © 2021 Kitamura and Matsuo.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Japan; culture; moral foundation theory; morality; purity

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643126      PMCID: PMC7905017          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  9 in total

1.  Disgust sensitivity and the sex difference in fears to common indigenous animals.

Authors:  W A Arrindell; S Mulkens; J Kok; J Vollenbroek
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1999-03

2.  The CAD triad hypothesis: a mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity).

Authors:  P Rozin; L Lowery; S Imada; J Haidt
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-04

3.  Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing.

Authors:  Chen-Bo Zhong; Katie Liljenquist
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Jonathan Haidt; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-05

5.  Beyond beliefs: religions bind individuals into moral communities.

Authors:  Jesse Graham; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-02

6.  Testing Measurement Invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire Across 27 Countries.

Authors:  Kathryn Iurino; Gerard Saucier
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2018-12-31

7.  Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion.

Authors:  Dacher Keltner; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2003-03

8.  Social Support in Two Cultures: Everyday Transactions in the U.S. and Empathic Assurance in Japan.

Authors:  Beth Morling; Yukiko Uchida; Sandra Frentrup
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Moving beyond the West vs. the rest: Understanding variation within Asian groups and its societal consequences.

Authors:  Michele J Gelfand; Emmy E Denison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.