Literature DB >> 30596252

Testing Measurement Invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire Across 27 Countries.

Kathryn Iurino1, Gerard Saucier1.   

Abstract

It has become clear that there are multiple "moralities": diverse bases that guide people's judgments of right and wrong. The widely known Moral Foundations Theory stipulates that there are at least five such moralities, measurable via questionnaire, and tends to assume that these distinct foundations are rooted deep in humanity's evolutionary past. Were this true, we should find that the structure of five foundations is cross-culturally generalizable. Such assumptions are best tested in a diverse range of global populations with no built-in Western bias. Here, we test the measurement invariance of the short-form Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries spanning the five largest continents. We find that it is difficult to specify Moral Foundations Questionnaire items in a quantitative five-factor model that will converge nonproblematically across a wide variety of populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Moral Foundations Questionnaire; cross-cultural assessment; measurement invariance; moral judgment; moral psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30596252     DOI: 10.1177/1073191118817916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  6 in total

1.  Measurement invariance of body image measures by age, gender, sexual orientation, race, weight status, and age: The U.S. Body Project I.

Authors:  Vivienne M Hazzard; Lauren M Schaefer; J Kevin Thompson; Stuart B Murray; David A Frederick
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2022-03-02

2.  Development and Validation of the Purity Orientation-Pollution Avoidance Scale: A Study With Japanese Sample.

Authors:  Hideya Kitamura; Akiko Matsuo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-11

3.  Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire.

Authors:  Michael Zakharin; Timothy C Bates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Why Are General Moral Values Poor Predictors of Concrete Moral Behavior in Everyday Life? A Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Study.

Authors:  Tom Gerardus Constantijn van den Berg; Maarten Kroesen; Caspar Gerard Chorus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-30

5.  The role of moral reasoning & personality in explaining lyrical preferences.

Authors:  Kyle J Messick; Blanca E Aranda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Moral "foundations" as the product of motivated social cognition: Empathy and other psychological underpinnings of ideological divergence in "individualizing" and "binding" concerns.

Authors:  Michael Strupp-Levitsky; Sharareh Noorbaloochi; Andrew Shipley; John T Jost
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.