Literature DB >> 33643067

Early Exposure to Water Turbidity Affects Visual Capacities in Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis).

Alice Goerger1, Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq1, Nadav Shashar2, Ludovic Dickel1.   

Abstract

In La Manche (English Channel) the level of turbidity changes, not only seasonally and daily in seawater but also along the coast. As a consequence, vision in marine species is limited when based only on contrast-intensity. It is hypothesized that polarization sensitivity (PS) may help individuals detect preys and predators in turbid environments. In the cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis, to date, all behavioral studies have been conducted on animals reared in clear water. But the cuttlefish sensory system is adapted to a range of turbid environments. Our hypothesis was that rearing cuttlefish in clear water may affect the development of their visual system, and potentially affect their visually guided behaviors. To test this, newly-hatched cuttlefish, from eggs laid by females brought in from the wild, were reared for 1 month under three different conditions: clear water (C group), low turbidity (0.1 g / l of clay, 50-80 NTU, LT group) and high turbidity (0.5 g / l of clay, 300-400 NTU, HT group). The visual capacities of cuttlefish were tested with an optomotor apparatus at 7 days and at 1 month post-hatching. Optomotor responses of juveniles were measured by using three screen patterns (black and white stripes, linearly polarized stripes set at different orientations, and a uniform gray screen). Optomotor responses of juveniles suggest that exposure to turbid water improves the development of their PS when tested in clear water (especially in LT group) but not when tested in turbid water. We suggest that the use of slightly turbid water in rearing systems may improve the development of vision in young cuttlefish with no detrimental effect to their survival rate. Future research will consider water turbidity as a possible factor for the improvement of cuttlefish well-being in artificial rearing systems.
Copyright © 2021 Goerger, Darmaillacq, Shashar and Dickel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cephalopods; development; linear polarization; optomotor response; vision

Year:  2021        PMID: 33643067      PMCID: PMC7902506          DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.622126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Physiol        ISSN: 1664-042X            Impact factor:   4.566


  28 in total

1.  High-resolution polarisation vision in a cuttlefish.

Authors:  S E Temple; V Pignatelli; T Cook; M J How; T-H Chiou; N W Roberts; N J Marshall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Developmental plasticity in vision and behavior may help guppies overcome increased turbidity.

Authors:  Sean M Ehlman; Benjamin A Sandkam; Felix Breden; Andrew Sih
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Visual fields, eye movements, and scanning behavior of a sit-and-wait predator, the black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Polarization sensitivity as a contrast enhancer in pelagic predators: lessons from in situ polarization imaging of transparent zooplankton.

Authors:  Sönke Johnsen; N Justin Marshall; Edith A Widder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Underwater linear polarization: physical limitations to biological functions.

Authors:  Nadav Shashar; Sönke Johnsen; Amit Lerner; Shai Sabbah; Chuan-Chin Chiao; Lydia M Mäthger; Roger T Hanlon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Maturation of polarization and luminance contrast sensitivities in cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis).

Authors:  Lelia Cartron; Ludovic Dickel; Nadav Shashar; Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Cephalopod neurobiology: an introduction for biologists working in other model systems.

Authors:  Christine L Huffard
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-01

8.  Optomotor response studies of insect vision.

Authors:  G D McCann; G F MacGinitie
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-11-23

Review 9.  Cephalopods in neuroscience: regulations, research and the 3Rs.

Authors:  Graziano Fiorito; Andrea Affuso; David B Anderson; Jennifer Basil; Laure Bonnaud; Giovanni Botta; Alison Cole; Livia D'Angelo; Paolo De Girolamo; Ngaire Dennison; Ludovic Dickel; Anna Di Cosmo; Carlo Di Cristo; Camino Gestal; Rute Fonseca; Frank Grasso; Tore Kristiansen; Michael Kuba; Fulvio Maffucci; Arianna Manciocco; Felix Christopher Mark; Daniela Melillo; Daniel Osorio; Anna Palumbo; Kerry Perkins; Giovanna Ponte; Marcello Raspa; Nadav Shashar; Jane Smith; David Smith; António Sykes; Roger Villanueva; Nathan Tublitz; Letizia Zullo; Paul Andrews
Journal:  Invert Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-03

Review 10.  Cephalopods as Predators: A Short Journey among Behavioral Flexibilities, Adaptions, and Feeding Habits.

Authors:  Roger Villanueva; Valentina Perricone; Graziano Fiorito
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.