| Literature DB >> 33642937 |
Vignesh Kumaravel1,2, Keerthi M Nair1,2, Snehamol Mathew1,2, John Bartlett1,2, James E Kennedy3, Hugh G Manning3, Barry J Whelan3, Nigel S Leyland3, Suresh C Pillai1,2.
Abstract
Engineering of self-di<cal">span class="Chemical">sipan>nfecting surfaces to constrain the cal">spread of SARS-CoV-2 is a challenging tcal">ask for the scientific community because the <cal">span class="Species">human coronavirus spreads through respiratory droplets. Titania (TiO2) nanocomposite antimicrobial coatings is one of the ideal remedies to disinfect pathogens (virus, bacteria, fungi) from common surfaces under light illumination. The photocatalytic disinfection efficiency of recent TiO2 nanocomposite antimicrobial coatings for surfaces, dental and orthopaedic implants are emphasized in this review. Mostly, inorganic metals (e.g. copper (Cu), silver (Ag), manganese (Mn), etc), non-metals (e.g. fluorine (F), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P)) and two-dimensional materials (e.g. MXenes, MOF, graphdiyne) were incorporated with TiO2 to regulate the charge transfer mechanism, surface porosity, crystallinity, and the microbial disinfection efficiency. The antimicrobial activity of TiO2 coatings was evaluated against the most crucial pathogenic microbes such as Escherichia coli, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, Legionella pneumophila, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans, T2 bacteriophage, H1N1, HCoV-NL63, vesicular stomatitis virus, bovine coronavirus. Silane functionalizing agents and polymers were used to coat the titanium (Ti) metal implants to introduce superhydrophobic features to avoid microbial adhesion. TiO2 nanocomposite coatings in dental and orthopaedic metal implants disclosed exceptional bio-corrosion resistance, durability, biocompatibility, bone-formation capability, and long-term antimicrobial efficiency. Moreover, the commercial trend, techno-economics, challenges, and prospects of antimicrobial nanocomposite coatings are also discussed briefly.Entities:
Keywords: Biofilm; E. coli; MRSA; Photocatalyst; ROS; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2021 PMID: 33642937 PMCID: PMC7899925 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Eng J ISSN: 1385-8947 Impact factor: 13.273
Fig. 1Schematic of photocatalytic disinfection mechanism on a mobile phone screen.
Fig. 2Schematic of biofilm formation cycles on a surface.
Fig. 3Schematic of ROSs formation during semiconductor photocatalysis [39]. Reproduced with permission from [39]. Copyrights (2017), American Chemical Society.
Fig. 4Schematic of ROSs attack on the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria cell wall [40]. Reproduced with permission from ref. [40]. Copyrights (2020), American Chemical Society.
Fig. 5Photocatalytic disinfection mechanism of (a) bacteria, and (b) virus [46]. Reproduced with permission from ref. [46]. Copyrights (2019), Elsevier.
Fig. 6In-vivo studies of wound healing using various materials (Car, Ga, H-TiO2-x@MOF): (A) schematic of the experimental procedure, (B) photographs of the infected wounds at various time intervals, (C) survival rates for 14 days treatment, (D) quantitative representation of the infection percentage at various time intervals, (E) H and E stained images of the tissue sections at 7 and 14 days, and (F) photographs of plated bacterial colonies from the infected skin tissues [21]. Reproduced with permission from [21]. Copyrights (2020), John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 7Schematics: (a) the reflection of incident light, photogeneration of charge carriers, and the electron-hole recombination process on TiO2, (b) photocatalytic generation of ROSs, (c) stepwise processes for the diffusion of ROSs out of the nanopillars for the contact killing of microbes, (d) interaction of light on TiO2 coated on Si nanopillars (inset simulations of light-nanopillar interaction), (e) interaction of light on TiO2 coated on SiO2 nanopillars [66]. Reproduced with permission from [66]. Copyrights (2020), American Chemical Society.
Fig. 8(a) SEM image of TiO2NWs filter overlapped with schematic images of pathogens, (b) photocatalytic mechanism of ROSs generation on the humid TiO2NWs [1]. Reproduced with permission from [1]. Copyrights (2020), John Wiley and Sons.
Fig. 9Invitro antimicrobial activity of control and superhydrophobic Ti discs: (A) polymicrobial adhesion for 2 h, (B) fungal adhesion for 2 h, (C) S. mutans adhesion for 4 h, (D) SEM and the CLSM images of the biofilm, (E) average total biovolume of biofilms for 24 h, (F) average colony-forming units of polymicrobial biofilm for 24 h, and (G) average colony-forming units of biofilm for 24 h and exposed to chlorhexidine (0.5%) for 3 h [112]. Reproduced with permission from [112]. Copyrights (2020), American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10TiO2/GDY photocatalytic coatings for orthopaedic implant infection: Schematic of ROSs formation mechanism and biocompatibility [116]. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [116]. Copyrights (2020), Springer Nature.