| Literature DB >> 33642403 |
Jean Baptiste Yaokreh1, Moufidath Sounkéré-Soro1, Samba Tembely1, Yapo Guy-Serge Kouamé1, Audrey Helen Thomas1, Thierry-Hervé Odéhouri-Koudou2, Bertin Dibi Kouamé1, Ossénou Ouattara1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing has become the treatment of choice for femur shaft fractures in school-age children in developed world. However, in the sub-Saharan Africa, this management is still challenging because of the lack of fluoroscopy in more hospitals. We performed either primary open reduction and intramedullary K-wire fixation (PORIKF) or conservative treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of these two procedures employed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 62 children with 64 fractures (10 years on an average; range: 6-15 years) treating for femoral shaft fractures either by PORIKF (n = 21; 23 fractures) or skin traction followed by spica cast (n = 41) between 2008 and 2017. Outcomes were assessed using Flynn criteria. Comparisons were made by Fisher and Student's t-test with a significant P < 5%.Entities:
Keywords: Children; K-wire fixation; femoral shaft fracture; open reduction; traction and spica cast
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33642403 PMCID: PMC8232366 DOI: 10.4103/ajps.AJPS_35_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Afr J Paediatr Surg ISSN: 0974-5998
Demographic and clinical data of the study population
| PORIKF | ST/SC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 16/5 | 26/15 | 0.3084 |
| Age (years, mean±SD) | 11.2±2.52 (7- 15) | 10.1±3.01 (6- 15) | 0.1249 |
| Scholar status | |||
| School children | 16 | 29 | |
| Unschooled | 5 | 12 | |
| Mechanisms | |||
| Road traffic accident | 18 | 23 | |
| Fall from height | 2 | 7 | |
| Sport injuries | - | 8 | |
| Home trauma | 1 | 2 | |
| Others | - | 1 | |
| Site of fracture | |||
| Left | 8 | 24 | 0.0673 |
| Right | 11 | 17 | |
| Bilateral | 2 | - | |
| Level of fracture | |||
| 1/3rd proximal | 7 | 19 | 0.2954 |
| 1/3rd middle | 12 | 15 | |
| 1/3rd distal | 3 | 7 | |
| Bifocal | 1 | 0 | |
| Pattern of fracture | |||
| Transverse | 15 | 25 | 0.3966 |
| Oblique | 7 | 14 | |
| Spiral | 1 | 2 | |
| Weight (kg), mean±SD | 34±12.9 (15- 66) | 28.9±6.85 (13- 54) | 0.3791 |
| Hospital stays (days), mean±SD | 18.68±9.06 (3- 34) | 20±6.85 (13- 54) | 0.0621 |
| Bone healing (weeks), mean±SD | 13.9±3.23 (8.5- 47.1) | 13.2±2.54 (9- 25) | 0.4346 |
| Return to daily activities (weeks) | 9.1±2.45 | 14.1±2.54 | 0.0000* |
*Statistically significant. SD: Standard deviation, ESIN: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing, POR: Primary open reduction, ST/SC: Skin traction followed by spica cast
Flynn’s scoring criteria[18]
| Excellent | Good | Poor | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limb length discrepancy (cm) | <1 | <2 | >2 |
| Malunion (°) | <5 | 5- 10 | >10 |
| Pain | Absent | Absent | Present |
| Complications | Absent | Mild | Major/extended morbidity |
Outcomes according to Flynn criteria
| PORIKF ( | ST/SC ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent (%) | 13 (56.5) | 26 (63.4) | 0.4392 |
| Good (%) | 8 (34.8) | 6 (14.6) | 0.4392 |
| Poor (%) | 2 (8.7) | 9 (22) | 0.3012 |
| Follow-up (years, range) | 2.14 (0.5- 4) | 4.45 (0.5- 6) |
PORIKF: Primary open reduction and intramedullary k-wire fixation, ST/SC: Skin traction followed by spica cast
Figure 1An 8-year-old girl sustained femoral shaft fracture. (a) Pre-operative anteroposterior view. (b) Post-operative appearance after open reduction and elastic stable intramedullary nailing; (c) Nine months' radiographs show complete union
Distribution of complications
| PORIKF | ST/SC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor complications | 20 | 28 | |
| Skin irritation | 3 | 0 | 0.6438 |
| Knee stiffness | 7 | 0 | |
| Cheloid scar | 2 | 0 | |
| Spica cast change | 0 | 15 | |
| Superficial infection at nail entry point | 3 | 0 | |
| LLD <2 cm | 3 | 8 | |
| Malunion | |||
| Valgus <10° | 1 | 1 | |
| Varus <10° | 1 | 2 | |
| Procurvatum <10° | 0 | 1 | |
| Recurvatum <10° | 0 | 1 | |
| Major complications | 3 | 17 | |
| Osteomyelitis | 1 | 0 | 0.0177* |
| Delayed union | 1 | 0 | |
| Secondary displacement | 0 | 5 | |
| Malunion | |||
| Varus >10° | 0 | 4 | 0.3333 |
| Procurvatum >10° | 1 | 0 | |
| LLD >2 cm | 0 | 8 |
Statistically significant, PORIKF: Primary open reduction and intramedullary K-wire fixation, ST/SC: Skin traction followed by spica cast, LLD: Leg length discrepancy
Figure 2Clinical aspect of limb inequality (leg length discrepancy >2 cm) after conservative treatment