Literature DB >> 17065959

Use and abuse of flexible intramedullary nailing in children and adolescents.

Pierre Lascombes1, Thierry Haumont, Pierre Journeau.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) has became a well-accepted method of osteosynthesis of diaphyseal fractures in children and adolescents for many reasons including the following: no need for postoperative cast, primary bone union with avoidance of growth plate injury, and minimum invasive surgery. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The principle is to introduce 2 elastic nails, titanium or stainless steel, into the medullary canal through a metaphyseal approach. The bended nails must have their maximum of curve at the level of the fracture, and their orientation, most often face to face, is in charge of the reduction and, so far, the stabilization, of the fracture. The usual size of the nails is equal to 0.4 times the diameter of the medullary canal. As far as possible, a bigger diameter is better than a thinner one. Most fractures of the femur are treated with a bipolar retrograde ESIN when some distal fractures need an antegrade subtrochanteric approach. Forearm fractures need a combined retrograde radial and antegrade ulnar through the posterolateral part of the olecranon. Humerus and tibial diaphyseal fractures may also be treated with ESIN. Complications are mainly caused by technical errors including too-thin nails, asymmetry of the frame, and malorientation of the implants. Nonunion was never observed in fractures of the femur and the forearm; osteomyelitis rate is 2%, and mean overgrowth of the femur is less than 10 mm before the age of 10 years. Indications of ESIN are fractures of the diaphysis: all the fractures of the femur between the age of 6 years and the end of growth except for the severe open grade III fractures, all the unstable fractures of the forearm, and some unstable fractures of the humerus and the tibia during adolescence or before the end of growth. In addition, ESIN is indicated in polytraumatism and multiple injuries.
CONCLUSIONS: The good results of this reliable technique are obtained when surgeons have a good knowledge of it, especially in the understanding of the principle of the correction of the fracture and its stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17065959     DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000235397.64783.d6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  56 in total

1.  Proximal femoral neck penetration after flexible intramedullary nailing for pediatric femur fractures: a rare complication.

Authors:  Kelly D Carmichael; Frank A Schroeder
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Complications of Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for treating paediatric long bone fractures.

Authors:  Aamer Nisar; Abhijit Bhosale; Sanjeev S Madan; Mark J Flowers; James A Fernandes; Stanley Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-02-26

3.  [Therapy of pediatric femoral fractures. Two versus three elastic stable intramedullary nails].

Authors:  A Semaan; T Klein; T M Boemers; M R Vahdad
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Forearm diaphyseal fractures in the adolescent population: treatment and management.

Authors:  Jeremy Truntzer; Matthew L Vopat; Patrick M Kane; Melissa A Christino; Julia Katarincic; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-06-06

Review 5.  [Diametaphyseal forearm fracture in childhood. Pitfalls and recommendations for treatment].

Authors:  J Lieber; D W Sommerfeldt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Minimized approaches to the posterolateral chest wall in the fixation of rib fracture.

Authors:  Yih-Wen Tarng; Yi-Pin Chou; Tung-Ho Wu; Hsing-Lin Lin
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Elastic intramedullary nailing in unstable fractures of the paediatric tibial diaphysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark G Swindells; R A Rajan
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Risk factors for refracture of the forearm in children treated with elastic stable intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Bingqiang Han; Zhigang Wang; Yuchan Li; Yunlan Xu; Haiqing Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  An observational cohort study of the adoption of elastic stable intramedullary nailing for the treatment of pediatric femur fractures in Kumasi, Ghana.

Authors:  Scott P Kaiser; Tai Holland; Paa Kwesi Baidoo; Richard C Coughlin; Peter Konadu; Dominic Awariyah; Raphael A Kumah-Ametepey
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The incidence of compartment syndrome after flexible nailing of pediatric tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Nirav K Pandya; Eric W Edmonds; Scott J Mubarak
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.