| Literature DB >> 33641491 |
Abhimanyu Chandel1, Saloni Patolia2, Mary Looby3, Najeebah Bade4, Vikramjit Khangoora5, Christopher S King5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: D-dimer concentration has been used by institutions to identify candidates for intensified anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism prevention and for the mitigation of the microthrombotic complications associated with COVID-19. Thromboelastography (TEG) maximum amplitude (MA) has been validated as a marker of hypercoagulability and MA ≥68 mm has been utilized as a marker of hypercoagulability in other conditions.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; thromboelastography; venous thromboembolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33641491 PMCID: PMC8145413 DOI: 10.1177/0885066621997039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care Med ISSN: 0885-0666 Impact factor: 3.510
Characteristics of Patients Categorized by Diagnosed Macrothrombosis.a
| All subjects | Macrothrombosis | No thrombosis |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 24 | N = 12 | N = 12 | ||
| Age (years) | 46 (37, 53) | 50 (41, 52) | 45 (26, 54) | 0.37 |
| Gender, women | 4 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 4 (33.0) | 0.09 |
| Race, non-white | 20 (83.3) | 11 (91.7) | 9 (75.0) | 0.59 |
| Time prior to ECMO initiation (days) | 5 (2, 7) | 6 (2, 9) | 5 (2, 6) | 0.40 |
| MA (mm) | 72.8 (71.2, 78.5) | 74.9 (72.2, 80.2) | 72.1 (70.4, 78.1) | 0.23 |
| R time (min) | 10.4 (8.3, 12.8) | 11.6 (8.4, 12.6) | 10.3 (8.1, 13.4) | 0.86 |
| D-dimer (ug/mL) | 3.5 (2.3, 8.0) | 3.1 (2.3, 5.5) | 3.9 (2.4, 9.5) | 0.31 |
| Fibrinogen (mg/dL) | 543.5 (474.0, 690.3) | 582.5 (537.8, 768.8) | 501.5 (443.0, 578.3) | 0.04 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 11.1 (4.8, 17.8) | 15.3 (8.1, 27.0) | 7.6 (2.8, 12.8) | 0.04 |
| Ferritin (ng/mL) | 985.2 (623.0, 2070.5) | 1004.6 (532.5, 2536.5) | 965.8 (654.9, 2070.5) | 0.92 |
| Bleeding complication | 2 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 0.48 |
| Time on ECMO (days) | 13 (9, 21) | 16 (11, 23) | 10 (7, 19) | 0.11 |
| Death during hospitalization | 5 (20.8) | 4 (33.3) | 1 (8.3) | 0.32 |
Abbreviations: MA, maximum amplitude; CRP, C-reactive protein.
a Data are presented as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) or n (%) unless otherwise indicated.
Figure 1.(A) Ln (MA) vs. ln(D-dimer) with linear regression for patients on heparin, bivalirudin, and aggregated patients. (B) Ln (MA) vs. ln(fibrinogen) with linear regression for patients on heparin, bivalirudin, and aggregated patients.
Figure 2.ROC curve for C-reactive protein as a predictor of maximum amplitude ≥68 mm 11x8mm (1200 x 1200 DPI).
Figure 3.ROC curve for fibrinogen as a predictor of maximum amplitude ≥68 mm 22x16mm (1200 x 1200 DPI).