Literature DB >> 33641233

Intervention by clinical pharmacists can improve blood glucose fluctuation in patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Fang-Hong Shi1, Long Shen2, Jiang Yue3, Jing Ma3, Zhi-Chun Gu1, Hao Li4, Hou-Wen Lin1.   

Abstract

Acute phase hyperglycemia and exaggerated glucose fluctuation may be associated with poor outcomes in diabetic patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to determine whether intervention by clinical pharmacists can mitigate blood glucose and glucose fluctuations in these fragile patients. This retrospective study enrolled patients with diabetes and AMI, from 1 January 2019 to 30 June 2020 in our institution. Blood glucose and glucose fluctuations were calculated before and after the pharmacist's intervention and between patients who underwent intervention and those who did not. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the impact of patient characteristics on the results. A total of 170 patients were included in our primary analysis, including 29 patients who received the pharmacist intervention and 141 patients who did not. After the pharmacist's intervention, blood glucose (fasting blood glucose-FBG, from 11.9 to 9.8; postprandial blood glucose-PBG, from 15.3 to 13.2; mean blood glucose-BG, 14.5 to 12.3 mmol/L; p < .001), and glucose fluctuations (standard deviation of blood glucose-SDBG, from 3.8 to 3.0, mmol/L, p = .005) were significantly improved. Before PSM, no clear effects were found in intervention versus nonintervention patients, in terms of blood glucose and glucose fluctuation indicators, except for FBG (9.3 vs. 8.0. mmol/L, p = .005). Further analysis indicated a high incidence of FBG <7.8 mmol/L in nonintervention versus intervention patients (51.5% vs. 27.6%, p = .003). After PSM, a significant reduction in blood glucose fluctuation (SDBG, 3.0 vs. 4.1, p = .031; PBGE, 2.1 vs. 4.1, p = .017; LAGE, 4.7 vs. 7.2, mmol/L, p = .004), and PBG (11.1 vs. 13.0, mmol/L, p = .048) was observed in the intervention group than in the nonintervention group. The clinical pharmacist intervention contributed to improved outcomes, specifically, in reducing blood glucose fluctuations and potential hypoglycemia risk.
© 2021 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood glucose; clinical pharmacist's intervention; consultation; glucose fluctuation; propensity score matching

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33641233      PMCID: PMC7914773          DOI: 10.1002/prp2.725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect        ISSN: 2052-1707


  27 in total

1.  Blood glucose level on admission determines in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Damian Pres; Mariusz Gasior; Krzysztof Strojek; Marek Gierlotka; Michał Hawranek; Andrzej Lekston; Krzysztof Wilczek; Mateusz Tajstra; Janusz Gumprecht; Lech Poloński
Journal:  Kardiol Pol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.108

2.  Brief report: Comparison of continuous glucose monitoring and finger-prick blood glucose levels in hospitalized patients administered basal-bolus insulin.

Authors:  Morton G Burt; Gregory W Roberts; Norma R Aguilar-Loza; Stephen N Stranks
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 3.  The impact of pharmacist care on diabetes outcomes in primary care settings: An umbrella review of published systematic reviews.

Authors:  Sara Abdulrhim; Sowndramalingam Sankaralingam; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim; Ahmed Awaisu
Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.459

4.  Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Louis Monnier; Emilie Mas; Christine Ginet; Françoise Michel; Laetitia Villon; Jean-Paul Cristol; Claude Colette
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Glucose intolerance is common in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome who were not previously diagnosed with diabetes.

Authors:  Koichi Hashimoto; Katsunori Ikewaki; Hidenori Yagi; Hidetaka Nagasawa; Satoshi Imamoto; Takahiro Shibata; Seibu Mochizuki
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Glucose variability and mortality in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kasia J Lipska; Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Kensey Gosch; Boris Kovatchev; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt; Philip G Jones; Silvio E Inzucchi; John A Spertus; J Hans DeVries; Mikhail Kosiborod
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2012-06-12

7.  Acute-phase glucose fluctuation is negatively correlated with myocardial salvage after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ikuko Teraguchi; Toshio Imanishi; Yuichi Ozaki; Takashi Tanimoto; Minoru Ueyama; Makoto Orii; Yasutsugu Shiono; Kunihiro Shimamura; Kohei Ishibashi; Takashi Yamano; Yasushi Ino; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Kumiko Hirata; Takashi Kubo; Tokio Sanke; Takashi Akasaka
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 8.  Pharmacist-Led Self-management Interventions to Improve Diabetes Outcomes. A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Linda van Eikenhorst; Katja Taxis; Liset van Dijk; Han de Gier
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Impact of admission glycemic variability, glucose, and glycosylated hemoglobin on major adverse cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Gong Su; Shu-hua Mi; Hong Tao; Zhao Li; Hong-Xia Yang; Hong Zheng; Yun Zhou; Lei Tian
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Glycemic variability correlates strongly with postprandial beta-cell dysfunction in a segment of type 2 diabetic patients using oral hypoglycemic agents.

Authors:  Klaus-Dieter Kohnert; Petra Augstein; Eckhard Zander; Peter Heinke; Karolina Peterson; Ernst-Joachim Freyse; Roman Hovorka; Eckhard Salzsieder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacist-Managed Diabetes Programs: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Amanda Wojtusik Orabone; Vincent Do; Elizabeth Cohen
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.249

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.